green
Positive treatment
5.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 24 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
General Aircraft Corp. v. Air America, Inc.
But cf. Poster Exchange Inc. v. National Screen Service Corp., 517 F.2d 117, 129 (5th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1054 , 96 S.Ct. 784 , 46 L.Ed.2d 643 (1976) (further injury resulting from a prior overt act does not give rise to a new cause of action).
discussed
Cited "see"
Manchester Manufacturing Acquisitions, Inc. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
See Randall, supra, 478 U.S. at 662 , 106 S.Ct. at 3152 (citing Harris v. American Investment Co., 523 F.2d 220, 225 (8th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1054 , 96 S.Ct. 784 , 46 L.Ed.2d 643 (1976)).
cited
Cited "see"
Behrens v. Wometco Enterprises, Inc.
See Harris v. American Investment Co., 523 F.2d 220, 226-27 (8th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1054 , 96 S.Ct. 784 , 46 L.Ed.2d 643 (1976); In re Warner, 618 F.Supp. at 744 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Revelle Motors, Inc. v. Spector (In Re Spector)
See Exhibitors Poster Exchange, Inc. v. National Screen Service Corporation, 517 F.2d 110, 115-16 (5th Cir. 1975), reh’g denied, 520 F.2d 943 , cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1054 , 96 S.Ct. 784 , 46 L.Ed.2d 643 (1976); In re Falstaff Brewing Corporation Antitrust Litigation, 441 F.Supp. 62, 66 (E.D.Mo.1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Sales, Inc. v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc.
See Poster Exchange, Inc. v. National Screen Service Corporation, 456 F.2d 662, 667 (5th Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1054 , 96 S.Ct. 784 , 46 L.Ed.2d 643 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Food for Health Co. v. 3839 Joint Venture
See Exhibitors Poster Exchange, Inc. v. National Screen Service Corp., 517 F.2d 110 (5th Cir. 1975), cert. den., 423 U.S. 1054 , 96 S.Ct. 784 , 46 L.Ed.2d 643 (1975); accord, Yavapai County v. Wilkinson, 111 Ariz. 530 , 534 P.2d 735 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Arnold B. ELKIND, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, v. LIGGETT & MYERS, INC., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee
See Harris v. American Investment Company, 523 F.2d 220, 227 (8th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1054 , 96 S.Ct. 784 , 46 L.Ed.2d 643 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
James W. McCord Jr. v. F. Lee Bailey
(2×)
See Exhibitors Poster Exchange, Inc. v. National Screen Service Corp., 517 F.2d 110, 115-16 (5th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1054 , 96 S.Ct. 784 , 46 L.Ed.2d 643 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Sharp v. Coopers & Lybrand
See Harris v. American Investment Co., 523 F.2d 220, 225-27 (8th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1054 , 96 S.Ct. 784 , 46 L.Ed.2d 643 (1976) and the cases cited therein.
discussed
Cited "see"
Mid-Texas Communications Systems, Inc. v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company
See Jacobi v. Bache & Co., 520 F.2d 1231, 1237-39 (2d Cir. 1975) (rejecting application of per se rule in light of regulation of stock exchange), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1053 , 96 S.Ct. 784 , 46 L.Ed.2d 642 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
P. J. Taggares Co. v. New York Mercantile Exchange
Id. at 360, 83 S.Ct. 1246 ; see Jacobi v. Bache & Co., 520 F.2d 1231, 1238 (2d Cir. 1975) (Friendly, J.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1053 , 96 S.Ct. 784 , 46 L.Ed.2d 642 (1976). 42 . 373 U.S. at 361 , 83 S.Ct. 1246 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Marbury Management, Inc. v. Kohn
See Harris v. American Investment Co., 523 F.2d 220 (8th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1054 , 96 S.Ct. 784 , 48 L.Ed.2d 643 (1976); Foster v. Financial Technology, Inc., 517 F.2d 1068 (9th Cir. 1975); Esplin v. Hirschi, 402 F.2d 94 (10th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 928 , 89 S.Ct. 1194 , 22 L.Ed.2d 459 (1969); Competitive Ass’n, Inc. v. International Health Services, [1974-1975 Binder] Fed.Sec.Law Rep.
discussed
Cited "see"
Steinberg v. Carey
Greenfield at 37; see Harris v. American Investment Co., 523 F.2d 220, 225 (8th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1054 , 96 S.Ct. 784 , 46 L.Ed.2d 643 (1976) (quoting Restatement of Torts § 549, Comment b, at 110 (1938)). 26 .
cited
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,613 George F. Nye, Gerald J. Sterner, and Thomas E. Mulcahy, Individually and as a Joint Venture Doing Business in the Name of Gerald J. Sterner, Cross-Appellants v. Blyth Eastman Dillon & Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Richard Newham, and Harold Covlin, Cross-Appellees. George F. Nye, Gerald J. Sterner, Thomas E. Mulcahy, Individually and as a Joint Venture Doing Business in the Name of Gerald J. Sterner v. Richard Newham, George F. Nye, Gerald J. Sterner, Thomas E. Mulcahy, Individually and as a Joint Venture Doing Business in the Name of Gerald J. Sterner v. Blyth Eastman Dillon and Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, and Harold Covlin
See Harris v. American Investment Company, 523 F.2d 220 (8th Cir. 1975), Cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1054 , 96 S.Ct. 784 , 46 L.Ed.2d 643 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Nye v. Blyth Eastman Dillon & Co.
See Harris v. American Investment Company, 523 F.2d 220 (8th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1054 , 96 S.Ct. 784 , 46 L.Ed.2d 643 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Gilbert v. Woods Marketing, Inc.
See Harris v. American Investment Co., 523 F.2d 220 , 229 n.7 (8th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1054 , 96 S.Ct. 784 , 46 L.Ed.2d 643 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mary Green v. Occidental Petroleum Corp.
See Harris v. American Investment Co., 523 F.2d 220 (8th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1054 , 96 S.Ct. 784 , 46 L.Ed.2d 643 (1976); Esplin v. Hirschi, 402 F.2d 94 (10th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 928 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,729 Mary Green v. Occidental Petroleum Corporation and Arthur Andersen & Company, Occidental Petroleum Corporation and Arthur Andersen & Company v. United States District Court for the Central District of California, Mary Green, Real Parties in Interest
See Harris v. American Investment Co., 523 F.2d 220 (8th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1054 , 96 S.Ct. 784 , 46 L.Ed.2d 643 (1976); Esplin v. Hirschi, 402 F.2d 94 (10th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 928 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Keystone Resources, Inc. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.
However, “where all the damages complained of necessarily result from a pre-limitations act by defendant, no new cause of action accrues for any subsequent act committed by defendant within the limitations period because those acts do not injure plaintiff.” Imperial Point Colonnades Condominium, Inc. v. Mangurian, 549 F.2d 1029, 1035 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 859 , 98 S.Ct. 185 , 54 L.Ed.2d 132 (1978); see also The Poster Exchange, Inc. v. National Screen Service Corp., 517 F.2d 117, 126-127 (5th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1054 , 96 S.Ct. 784 , 46 L.Ed.2d 643 (1976).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Gartenberg v. Merrill Lynch Asset Management, Inc.
See, e.g., Exhibitors Poster Exchange, Inc. v. National Screen Service Corp., 517 F.2d 110, 114 (5th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1054 , 96 S.Ct. 784 , 46 L.Ed.2d 643 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Harold Friedman Inc. v. Thorofare Markets Inc. And Union Real Estate Company
See also Poster Exchange, Inc. v. National Screen Service Corp., 517 F.2d 117, 123-29 (5th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1054 , 96 S.Ct. 784 , 46 L.Ed.2d 643 (1976); Braun v. Berenson, 432 F.2d 538, 543 (5th Cir. 1970) (“refusal to lease a space unavailable during the time intervening after a prior refusal is not the ‘reiteration’ of a ‘refusal to deal’ policy,” and limitations period begins anew from the later refusal to lease). 45 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Nora Faye Johnson v. United States
See, e. g., Poster Exchange, Inc. v. National Screen Service Corp., 517 F.2d 117 (5th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1054 , 96 S.Ct. 784 , 46 L.Ed.2d 643 (1976); Rachal v. Hill, 435 F.2d 59 (5th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 904 , 91 S.Ct. 2203 , 29 L.Ed.2d 680 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Vervaecke v. Chiles
See also Harris v. American Investment Co., 523 F.2d 220 , 229 n.7 (8th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1054 , 96 S.Ct. 784 , 46 L.Ed.2d 643 (1976). 17 Vervaecke has argued to this court, however, that a different reliance-causation rule found in Affiliated Ute Citizens v. United States, 406 U.S. 128 , 92 S.Ct. 1456 , 31 L.Ed.2d 741 (1972) is applicable to this case; that positive proof of his reliance on the defendants' wrongful conduct as outlined above is unnecessary; that causation in fact may properly be presumed; and that the burden has now shifted to the defendants for clear proof of…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Vervaecke v. Chiles, Heider & Co.
See also Harris v. American Investment Co., 523 F.2d 220 , 229 n.7 (8th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1054 , 96 S.Ct. 784 , 46 L.Ed.2d 643 (1976).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
American Investment Co.
v.
Harris
v.
Harris
No. 75-668.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 12, 1976.
Published
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.