green
Positive treatment
5.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Banco De Ponce v. Hinsdale Supermarket Corp.
But see Dreyfus v. Von Finch, 534 F.2d 24, 28 (2d Cir.) (allegation of federal claim pursuant to Military Law 59 found to be frivolous), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 835 , 97 S.Ct. 102 , 50 L.Ed.2d 101 (1976).
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Benson Joseph Donoho
Whiting v. United States, 296 F.2d 512 (1st Cir. 1961), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 884 , 84 S.Ct. 158 , 11 L.Ed.2d 114 (1963); Carlton v. United States, 198 F.2d 795, 797 (9th Cir. 1952); Pulido v. United States, 425 F.2d 1391, 1393-94 (9th Cir. 1970); but see United States v. McClain, 531 F.2d 431, 435-437 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 835 , 97 S.Ct. 102 , 50 L.Ed.2d 101 (1976) (hearsay testimony inadmissible to show predisposition in the absence of exception to the hearsay rule).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Heinemann
The defense of duress . . . shall not be available to a person who intentionally or recklessly places himself in a situation in which it is probable that he will be subjected to duress.” “Duress . . . excuses a crime when another’s unlawful threat of death or serious bodily injury reasonably causes the defendant to do a criminal act in a situation in which there was no other opportunity to avoid the threatened danger.” United States v. Michelson, 559 F.2d 567, 569 (9th Cir. 1977); accord United States v. McClain, 531 F.2d 431, 438 (9th Cir.), cert, denied, 429 U.S. 835 , 97 S. Ct. 102 …
discussed
Cited "see"
Tachiona v. Mugabe
See International Instruments, Vol. I, Pt. , 1, at 4. 158 . 534 F.2d 24, 30 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 835 , 97 S.Ct. 102 , 50 L.Ed.2d 101 (1976); see also Jafari v. Islamic Republic of Iran, 539 F.Supp. 209, 214-15 (N.D.Ill.1982) (holding that the expropriation by a state of property of its own nationals does not contravene the law of nations); Restatement of Foreign Relations, supra § 702 cmt. k (noting that ‘‘[t]here is ... wide disagreement among states as to the scope and content of that right, which weighs against the conclusion that a human right to property generally ha…
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Albert Keith Webster
(3×)
See United States v. McClain, 531 F.2d 431, 436 (9th Cir.), cert. denied 429 U.S. 835 , 97 S.Ct. 102 , 50 L.Ed.2d 101 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Verlinden B. v. V. Central Bank of Nigeria
See Dreyfus v. von Finck, 534 F.2d 24, 30-31 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 835 , 97 S.Ct. 102 , 50 L.Ed.2d 101 (1976); IIT v. Vencap, Ltd., supra, 519 F.2d at 1015 . 17 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Frank Gunnar Williams
(2×)
See Dreyfus v. Von Finck, 534 F.2d 24, 30-31 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 835 , 97 S.Ct. 102 , 50 L.Ed.2d 101 (1976); United States v. Gengler, 510 F.2d 62 , 67 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 1001 , 95 S.Ct. 2400 , 44 L.Ed.2d 668 (1975); Kalmich v. Bruno, 450 F.Supp. 227, 229 (W.D.Ill.1978); Restatement (Second) of Foreign Relations Law of the United States § 115, comment e (1962).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bauer v. State
See also, United States v. McClain, 531 F.2d 431 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 835 , 97 S.Ct. 102 , 50 L.Ed.2d 101 (1976); United States v. Ambrose, 483 F.2d 742, 752 (6th Cir.1973); United States v. Johnston, 426 F.2d 112, 114 (7th Cir.1970); United States v. Catanzaro, 407 F.2d 998, 1001 (3d Cir.1969); Whiting v. United States, 296 F.2d 512, 517 (1st Cir.1961); Bowser v. State, 50 Md.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Rouleau
“Duress . . . excuses a crime when another’s unlawful threat of death or serious bodily injury reasonably causes the defendant to do a criminal act in a situation in which there was no other opportunity to avoid the threatened danger.” United States v. Michelson, 559 F.2d 567, 569 (9th Cir. 1977); see also United States v. McClain, 531 F.2d 431, 438 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 835 , 97 S. Ct. 102 , 50 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Republic of the Philippines v. Marcos
See also Dreyfus v. Von Finck, 534 F.2d 24, 30-31 (2d Cir.) (coerced transfer of Jewish German citizen’s property by Nazis not a violation of international law triable in a United States court), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 835 , 97 S.Ct. 102 , 50 L.Ed.2d 101 (1976); IIT v. Vencap, Ltd., 519 F.2d 1001, 1015 (2d Cir.1975) (acts of theft not violations of international law and not triable here under Alien Tort Claims statute).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Republic of Philippines v. Marcos
See also Dreyfus v. Von Finck, 534 F.2d 24, 30-31 (2d Cir.) (coerced transfer of Jewish German citizen's property by Nazis not a violation of international law triable in a United States court), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 835 , 97 S.Ct. 102 , 50 L.Ed.2d 101 (1976); IIT v. Vencap, Ltd., 519 F.2d 1001, 1015 (2d Cir.1975) (acts of theft not violations of international law and not triable here under Alien Tort Claims statute).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Mast Industries, Inc. v. Regan
See, e.g., Dreyfus v. Von Finck, 534 F.2d 24, 29-30 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 835 , 97 S.Ct. 102 , 50 L.Ed.2d 101 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bowser v. State
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. McClain, 531 F.2d 431 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 835 , 97 S.Ct. 102 , 50 L.Ed.2d 101 (1976); United States v. Ambrose, 483 F.2d 742 (6th Cir. 1973); United States v. Cantanzaro, 407 F.2d 998 (3rd Cir. 1969); Whiting v. United States, 296 F.2d 512 (1st Cir. 1961); State v. Cox, 110 Ariz. 603 , 522 P.2d 29 (1974); Price v. State, 397 N.E.2d 1043 (Ind.App. 1979); State v. Jones, 416 A.2d 676 (R.I. 1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Canadian Transport Company, a Division of MacMillan Bloedel (Alberni) Limited Bocimar N v. V. United States
See also Dreyfus v. Von Finck, 534 F.2d 24 (2d Cir.) cert. denied, 429 U.S. 835 , 97 S.Ct. 102 , 50 L.Ed.2d 101 (1976); Pauling v. McElroy, 164 F.Supp. 390 (D.D.C.1958), aff’d 107 U.S.App.D.C. 372 , 278 F.2d 252 , cert. denied 364 U.S. 835 , 81 S.Ct. 61 , 5 L.Ed.2d 60 (1960). *1093 Accordingly, we hold that the District Court correctly dismissed appellants’ second cause of action.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. William R. Perl
See, e. g., United States v. McClain, 531 F.2d 431, 437 (9 Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 835 , 97 S.Ct. 102 , 50 L.Ed.2d 101 (1976); United States v. Maddox, 492 F.2d 104, 106 (5 Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 851 , 95 S.Ct. 92 , 42 L.Ed.2d 82 (1974); United States v. DeAlesandro, 361 F.2d 694, 698-99 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 842 , 87 S.Ct. 94 , 17 L.Ed.2d 74 (1966); Johnson v. United States, 115 U.S.App.D.C. 63, 64 , 317 F.2d 127, 128 (1963); United States v. Romano, 278 F.2d 202, 204 (2 Cir. 1960); Polski v. United States, 33 F.2d 686, 687 (8 Cir.), cert. denied, 280 U.S. 591 , 50 S.C…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Edward Kuhn v. National Association of Letter Carriers, Branch 5 and International Association of Letter Carriers and United States Postal Service
See also Dreyfus v. Von Finck, 534 F.2d 24, 29 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 835 , 97 S.Ct. 102 , 50 L.Ed.2d 101 (1976); Crabb v. Weldon Bros., 164 F.2d 797, 803 (8th Cir. 1947).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
David
v.
California
v.
California
No. 75-1915.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1976.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.