green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
11.7 score
“the stay insures that the debtor's affairs will be centralized, initially, in a single forum in order 228 to prevent conflicting judgments from different courts and in order to harmonize all of the creditors' interests with one another.”
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
In Re Cafe partners/washington 1983
the stay insures that the debtor's affairs will be centralized, initially, in a single forum in order to prevent conflicting judgments from different courts and in order to harmonize all of the creditors' interests with one another.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Inslaw, Inc. v. United States (In Re Inslaw, Inc.)
the stay insures that the debtor's affairs will be centralized, initially, in a single forum in order 228 to prevent conflicting judgments from different courts and in order to harmonize all of the creditors' interests with one another.
discussed
Cited "see"
Hanna Coal Co. v. Internal Revenue Service
See In re Sharon, 200 B.R. 181, 199-200 (Bankr.S.D.Ohio 1996) (citing Fidelity Mortgage Investors v. Camelia Builders, Inc., 550 F.2d 47 (2d Cir.1976) cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1093 , 97 S.Ct. 1107 , 51 L.Ed.2d 540 ; In re Mack, 46 B.R. 652 (Bankr.E.D.Pa.1985)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Drexel Burnham Lambert Group Inc. v. Committee of Receivers for A.W. Galadari
(Rothberg v. Kirschenbaum), 725 F.2d 880, 887 (2d Cir.1984) (“ 'Merely to attempt to collect and liquidate the assets of a debtor is not to carry on its business in any- proper sense of the term.' ”) (quoting Austrian v. Williams, 216 F.2d 278, 285 (2d Cir.1954), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 953 , 75 S.Ct. 441 , 99 L.Ed. 745 (1955)); accord, In re Fidelity Mortgage Investors, Inc. (Fidelity Mortgage Investors v. Camelia Builders, Inc.), 550 F.2d 47, 57 (2d Cir.1976) (quoting Austrian, 216 F.2d at 285 ), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1093 , 97 S.Ct. 1107 , 51 L.Ed.2d 540 (1977). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Drexel Burnham Lambert Group Inc. v. Committee Of Receivers For A.W. Galadari
(Rothberg v. Kirschenbaum), 725 F.2d 880, 887 (2d Cir.1984) (" 'Merely to attempt to collect and liquidate the assets of a debtor is not to carry on its business in any proper sense of the term.' ") (quoting Austrian v. Williams, 216 F.2d 278, 285 (2d Cir.1954), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 953 , 75 S.Ct. 441 , 99 L.Ed. 745 (1955)); accord, In re Fidelity Mortgage Investors, Inc. (Fidelity Mortgage Investors v. Camelia Builders, Inc.), 550 F.2d 47, 57 (2d Cir.1976) (quoting Austrian, 216 F.2d at 285 ), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1093 , 97 S.Ct. 1107 , 51 L.Ed.2d 540 (1977) 4 Our dissenting colleague con…
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re De Kleinman
See Bankruptcy Code § 362(d); see In re Fugazy Express, Inc., 982 F.2d 769, 776 (2d Cir.1992); see generally, Fidelity Mortgage Investors v. Camelia Builders, Inc., 550 F.2d 47, 55 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1093 , 97 S.Ct. 1107 , 51 L.Ed.2d 540 (1977); reh’g denied, 430 U.S. 976 , 97 S.Ct. 1670 , 52 L.Ed.2d 372 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Searcy v. Knostman
See Fidelity Mortgage Investors v. Camelia Builders, Inc., 550 F.2d 47, 56-57 (2nd Cir.1976), ce rt. denied, 429 U.S. 1093 , 97 S.Ct. 1107 , 51 L.Ed.2d 540 (1977), and In re Revere Copper and Brass, Inc., 29 B.R. 584, 588 (S.D.N.Y.1983). 10 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Matter of Colonial Realty Co.
See Fidelity Mortgage Investors v. Camelia Builders, Inc., *1023 550 F.2d 47, 55 (2nd Cir.1976), cert. denied 429 U.S. 1093 , 97 S.Ct. 1107 , 51 L.Ed.2d 540 (1977), rehearing denied 430 U.S. 976 , 97 S.Ct. 1670 , 52 L.Ed.2d 372 (1977) (construing a predecessor version of § 362(a)) (the purpose of a bankruptcy stay is to “prevent a chaotic and uncontrolled scramble for the debtor’s assets in a variety of uncoordinated proceedings in different courts.
cited
Cited "see"
Harrell v. Harrell (In Re Harrell)
See In re Fidelity Mortgage Investors, 550 F.2d 47, 55 (2nd Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1093 , 97 S.Ct. 1107 , 51 L.Ed.2d 540 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re: Ezella M. Taylor, Debtor. Dina Tsafaroff Evelyn Simbas v. Ezella M. Taylor, Ezella M. Taylor v. Dina Tsafaroff Evelyn Simbas William Little, William Little v. Ezella M. Taylor David A. Gill, Trustee in Bankruptcy
See Fidelity Mortgage Investors v. Camelia Builders, Inc. (In re Fidelity Mortgage Investors), 550 F.2d 47, 57-58 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied 429 U.S. 1093 , 97 S.Ct. 1107 , 51 L.Ed.2d 540 (1977) 6 ; see also Bloom, 875 F.2d at 227 (good faith belief in right to property is irrelevant to "willfulness" of act of appropriateness of compensation award). 24 As Judge Mund observed in her Memorandum Opinion of August 4, 1986, "the stay is a broad provision which requires a creditor to seek a judicial determination of its right to proceed." (Emphasis added).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tsafaroff v. Taylor (In re Taylor)
See Fidelity Mortgage Investors v. Camelia Builders, Inc. (In re Fidelity Mortgage Investors), 550 F.2d 47, 57-58 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied 429 U.S. 1093 , 97 S.Ct. 1107 , 51 L.Ed.2d 540 (1977) 6 ; see also Bloom, 875 F.2d at 227 (good faith belief in right to property is irrelevant to “willfulness” of act of appropriateness of compensation award).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Dungey
See, Fidelity Mortgage Investors v. Camelia Builders, Inc., 550 F.2d 47 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1093 , 97 S.Ct. 1107 , 51 L.Ed.2d 540 (1977); Matter of Endres, 12 B.R. 404 (Bankr.E.D.Wis.1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Holman
See, Fidelity Mortgage Investors v. Camelia Builders, Inc., 550 F.2d 47 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1093 , 97 S.Ct. 1107 , 51 L.Ed.2d 540 (1977); Matter of Endres, 12 B.R. 404 (Bankr.E.D.Wis.1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dubin v. Jakobowski (In Re Stephen W. Grosse, P.C.)
See Fidelity Mortgage Investors v. Camelia Builders, Inc., 550 F.2d 47 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1093 , 97 S.Ct. 1107 , 51 L.Ed.2d 540 (1977); In re O’Connor, 42 B.R. 390 (Bankr.E.D.Ark.1984); Matter of Endres, 12 B.R. 404 (Bankr.E.D.Wis.1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dubin v. Jakobowski (In Re Stephen W. Grosse, P.C.)
See Fidelity Mortgage Investors v. Camelia Builders, Inc., 550 F.2d 47 (2d Cir.1976), ce rt. denied, 429 U.S. 1093 , 97 S.Ct. 1107 , 51 L.Ed.2d 540 (1977); In re O’Connor, 42 B.R. 390 (Bankr.E.D.Ark.1984); Matter of Endres, 12 B.R. 404 (Bankr.E.D.Wis.1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Matter of Plunkett
See Fidelity Mortgage Investors v. Camelia Builders, Inc., 550 F.2d 47 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1093 , 97 S.Ct. 1107 , 51 L.Ed.2d 540 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Donald
See In re Fidelity Mortgage Investors, 550 F.2d 47, 55 (2nd Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1093 , 97 S.Ct. 1107 , 51 L.Ed.2d 540 (1977). 9 Section 362(d) and Bank.R.Proc. 401(d) 1 explicitly authorize the bankruptcy court to lift the stay "for cause shown." Because there is no clear definition of what constitutes "cause," discretionary relief from the stay must be determined on a case by case basis. 2 Collier Bankruptcy Manual Sec. 362.06 (3d ed. 1979). 10 Upon relief from the automatic stay being granted, Donna intends to seek modification of the final judgment under Cal.Civ.Proc.Code Sec.…
cited
Cited "see"
Mac Donald v. Mac Donald
See In re Fidelity Mortgage Investors, 550 F.2d 47, 55 (2nd Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1093 , 97 S.Ct. 1107 , 51 L.Ed.2d 540 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Ashby
See Fidelity Mortgage Investors v. Camelia Builders, Inc., 550 F.2d 47, 58 (2d Cir.1976) cert. denied 429 U.S. 1093 , 97 S.Ct. 1107 , 51 L.Ed.2d 540 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Superior Propane v. Zartun (In Re Zartun)
See, Fidelity Mortgage Investors Co. v. Camelia Builders, Inc., 550 F.2d 47 (2d Cir.1976), cert. den. 429 U.S. 1093 , 97 S.Ct. 1107 , 51 L.Ed.2d 540 , reh. den. 430 U.S. 976 , 97 S.Ct. 1670 , 52 L.Ed.2d 372 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Revere Copper Products, Inc. v. Hudson River Sloop Clearwater, Inc. (In Re Revere Copper & Brass, Inc.)
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Fidelity Mortgage Investors v. Camelia Builders, Inc., 550 F.2d 47, 56 (2d Cir.1976), cert, denied, 429 U.S. 1093 , 97 S.Ct. 1107 , 51 L.Ed.2d 540 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Johns-Manville Sales Corp. v. Doan (In Re Johns-Manville Corp.)
See Fidelity Mortgage Investors v. Camelia Builders, Inc., 550 F.2d 47 (2d Cir.1976), ce rt. denied, 429 U.S. 1093 , 97 S.Ct. 1107 , 51 L.Ed.2d 540 , reh. denied, 430 U.S. 976 , 97 S.Ct. 1670 , 52 L.Ed.2d 372 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Norton
See Fidelity Mortgage Investors v. Camelia Builders, Inc., 550 F.2d 47 (2nd Cir.1976) cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1093 , 97 S.Ct. 1107 , 51 L.Ed.2d 540 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Borg-Warner Acceptance Corporation v. Alvin Dewayne Hall and Beverly Jane Hall, A/K/A Beverly Jane Cantin
See Fidelity Mortgage Investors v. Camelia Builders, Inc., 550 F.2d 47 (2nd Cir. 1976) cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1093 , 97 S.Ct. 1107 , 51 L.Ed.2d 540 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Wybro Federal Credit Union v. Mann (In Re Mann)
See Fidelity Mortgage Investors v. Camilia Builders, Inc., 550 F.2d 47 (2d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1093 , 97 S.Ct. 1107 , 51 L.Ed.2d 540 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Frankford Trust Co. v. Allanoff (In Re Dublin Properties)
See Fidelity Mortgage Investors v. Camilia Builders, Inc., 550 F.2d 47 (2d Cir. 1976) cert. denied 429 U.S. 1093 , 97 S.Ct. 1107 , 51 L.Ed.2d 540 (1977), citing In re Rubin, 378 F.2d 104 (3d Cir. 1967).
discussed
Cited "see"
Advance Mortgage Corp. v. Dennis (In Re Dennis)
See Fidelity Mortgage Investors v. Camilla Builders, Inc., 550 F.2d 47 (3d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1093 , 97 S.Ct. 1107 , 51 L.Ed.2d 540 (1977); United States v. Christie Industries, Inc., 465 F.2d 1002 (3d Cir. 1972); In re Rubin, 378 F.2d 104 (3d Cir. 1967); In re Abt, 2 B.R. 323 , 5 B.C.D. 1237 (Bkrtcy.E.D.Pa. 1980). 3 .
cited
Cited "see"
Matter of Batla
See Fidelity Mortgage Investors v. Camelia Builders, Inc., 550 F.2d 47, 54 (2d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1093 , 97 S.Ct. 1107 , 51 L.Ed.2d 540 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Halpert v. Interstate Computer Service, Inc. (In Re World Wide Gifts, Inc.)
See Fidelity Mortgage Investors v. Camelia Builders, Inc., 550 F.2d 47 (2d Cir. 1976), cert. den. 429 U.S. 1093 , 97 S.Ct. 1107 , 51 L.Ed.2d 540 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kemlon Products and Development Company v. United States of America
Accord James v. United Sates, 542 F.2d 16 (6th Cir. 1976), cert. denied 429 U.S. 1093 , 97 S.Ct. 1107 , 51 L.Ed.2d 540 (1977); Schildcrout v. McKeever, 580 F.2d 994 (9th Cir. 1978), and cases cited therein. 12 .
discussed
Cited "see"
In re National Hospital & Institutional Builders Co.
See Fidelity Mortgage Investors v. Camelia Builders, Inc., (In re Fidelity Mortgage Investors), 550 F.2d 47, 55 (2 Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1093 , 97 S.Ct. 1107 , 51 L.Ed.2d 540 reh. den., 430 U.S. 976 , 97 S.Ct. 1670 , 52 L.Ed.2d 372 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Matter of Nat. Hosp. & Inst. Builders Co.
See Fidelity Mortgage Investors v. Camelia Builders, Inc., ( In re Fidelity Mortgage Investors ), 550 F.2d 47, 55 (2 Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1093 , 97 S.Ct. 1107 , 51 L.Ed.2d 540 reh. den., 430 U.S. 976 , 97 S.Ct. 1670 , 52 L.Ed.2d 372 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Larmar Estates, Inc.
See, Fidelity Mortgage Investors v. Camelia Builders, Inc., 550 F.2d 47 (2d Cir. 1976) cert. denied 429 U.S. 1093 , 97 S.Ct. 1107, 51 L.Ed.2d 540 (1977). 2 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Abt v. Household Finance Co. (In Re Abt)
See Fidelity Mortgage Investors v. Camilia Builders, Inc., 550 F.2d 47 (2d Cir. 1976) cert. denied 429 U.S. 1093 , 97 S.Ct. 1107 , 51 L.Ed.2d 540 (1977), citing In re Rubin, 378 F.2d 104 (3d Cir. 1967).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Vaughn
See Fidelity Mortgage Investors v. Camelia Builders, Inc., 550 F.2d 47 (2nd Cir. 1966), cert. den’d., 429 U.S. 1093 , 97 S.Ct. 1107 , 51 L.Ed.2d 540 (1973) (violation of automatic stay provisions can .result of imposition of severe penalties).
discussed
Cited "see"
Thomas Thornburg v. United States
E. g., United States v. Grismore, 546 F.2d 844, 848 (10th Cir. 1976); United States v. Noah, 475 F.2d 688 , 695 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1095 , 94 S.Ct. 728 , 38 L.Ed.2d 553 (1973); see Kinty v. United Mine Workers, 544 F.2d 706 , 722-23 (4th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1093 , 97 S.Ct. 1107 , 51 L.Ed.2d 540 (1977); cf. United States v. Gates, 557 F.2d 1086 (5th Cir. 1977).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Fidelity Mortgage Investors, Debtor. Fidelity Mortgage Investors, Applicant-Appellee v. Camelia Builders, Inc.
See 97 S.Ct. 1107 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
MA Salazar, Inc. v. Incorporated Village of Atlantic Beach
See, e.g., Fidelity Mortgage Investors v. Camelia Builders, Inc., 550 F.2d 47 (2nd Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1093 , 97 S.Ct. 1107 , 51 L.Ed.2d 540 (1977); United States v. Christie Industries, Inc., 465 F.2d 1002 (3d Cir.1972); In re Mealey, 16 B.R. 800 (Bkrtcy.E.D.Pa.1982); In re Norton, 15 B.R. 623 (Bkrtcy.E.D.Pa.1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Atkins v. Martinez (In Re Atkins)
See also Fidelity Mortgage Investors v. Camelia Builders, Inc., 550 F.2d 47, 52 (2d Cir.1976), cert. den., 429 U.S. 1093 , 97 S.Ct. 1107 , 51 L.Ed.2d 540 (1977) (decided under Bankruptcy Act of 1898). 22 Again, given the uncontroverted facts as to Martinez’s awareness and intent in connection with the pendency of the bench warrant, the central issue here is legal: may an adjudication of contempt rest on a finding that a contemnor “negligently” or “inadvertently” violated a court order?
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Ionosphere Clubs, Inc.
See also In re Chateaugay Corp., Reomar Inc., 93 B.R. 26, 30 (S.D.N.Y.1988) (automatic stay is intended to prevent a “ ‘chaotic and uncontrolled scramble for the debtor’s assets in a variety of uncoordinated proceedings in different courts’ ”) (quoting Fidelity Mortgage Investors v. Camelia Builders, Inc., 550 F.2d 47, 55 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1093 , 97 S.Ct. 1107 , 51 L.Ed.2d 540 (1977)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Newport Offshore, Ltd.
See In re Inslaw, Inc., 76 B.R. 224, 240 (Bankr.D.Dist.Col.1987) (monetary sanctions may be imposed even for the ‘inadvertent violation’ of the automatic stay) accord: In re Eisenberg, 7 B.R. 683, 686 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y.1980) (‘actions taken in violation of the stay are void even when there is no actual notice of the existence of the stay’); see also Fidelity Mortgage Investors v. Camelia Builders, Inc., 550 F.2d 47, 51-52 (2d Cir. 1976) cert. denied 429 U.S. 1093 , 97 S.Ct. 1107 , 51 L.Ed.2d 540 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Burley v. American Gas & Oil Investors (In Re Heafitz)
See In re Inslaw, Inc., 76 B.R. 224, 240 (Bankr.D.Dist.Col.1987) (monetary sanctions may be imposed even for an “inadvertent violation” of the automatic stay) accord: In re Eisenberg, 7 B.R. 683, 686 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y.1980) (“action taken in violation of the stay are void even when there is no actual notice of the existence of the stay); see also Fidelity Mortgage Investors v. Camelia Builders, Inc., 550 F.2d 47, 51-52 (2d Cir.1976) cert. denied 429 U.S. 1093 , 97 S.Ct. 1107 , 51 L.Ed.2d 540 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Sequoia Auto Brokers, Ltd., Inc.
Sec. 69 (b) (1976) (repealed 1978) ] has in effect deprived the referee of the necessary power to protect proceedings before him from petty disturbances and acts of disobedience because of the inordinate inconvenience entailed by the statutory procedure for the judge and the referee. 19 Bankr.R. 920 adv. comm. note, 11 U.S.C.App. 255 (1982) (repealed 1983); see also Fidelity Mortgage Investors v. Camelia Builders (In re Fidelity Mortgage Investors, 550 F.2d 47, 50 (2d Cir.1976) (Rule 920 premised on statutory authority of Sec. 41(a)), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1093 , 97 S.Ct. 1107 , 51 L.Ed.2d 54…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Sequoia Auto Brokers, Ltd. v. Idell
App. 255 (1982) (repealed 1983); see also Fidelity Mortgage Investors v. Camelia Builders (In re Fidelity Mortgage Investors, 550 F.2d 47, 50 (2d Cir.1976) (Rule 920 premised on statutory authority of § 41(a)), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1093 , 97 S.Ct. 1107 , 51 L.Ed.2d 540 (1977). 4 Justice Douglas dissented from adoption of the rule: “The proposed new Rule 920 makes a change [from § 41 of the 1898 Act, ch. 541, 30 Stat. 544 , 556 (codified as amended at 11 U.S.C. § 69 ) (repealed 1978)], giving referees power to cite and punish for contempt in both the civil and criminal sense____ The Advi…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Planned Systems, Inc.
See also, Fidelity Mortgage Investors v. Camelia Builders, Inc., 550 F.2d 47, 55 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied 429 U.S. 1093 , 97 S.Ct. 1107 , 51 L.Ed.2d 540 (1977) (automatic stay is intended "to prevent a chaotic and uncontrolled scramble for the debtor’s assets in a variety of uncoordinated proceedings in different courts.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hunt v. Bankers Trust Co.
See also Fidelity Mortgage Investors v. Camelia Builders, Inc., 550 F.2d 47, 55 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1093 , 97 S.Ct. 1107 , 51 L.Ed.2d 540 (1977); Cornfeld v. Investors Overseas Servs., 471 F.Supp. 1255, 1260 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd mem., 614 F.2d 1286 (2d Cir.1979). . 683 F.2d 723 (2d Cir.1982). . 683 F.2d at 728 (emphasis in original). . 28 U.S.C. § 1651 (a) (1982); see also Meyerson v. Werner, 683 F.2d at 728 . . 28 U.S.C. § 1404 (a) provides that "[f]or the convenience of parties and witnesses, in the interest of justice, a district court may transfer any civil action to any o…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
William Herbert Hunt v. Bankers Trust Company, Republicbank Dallas, National Association, Counter-Plaintiffs v. Crescent Investment Company, Additional Counter-Defendants. Penrod Drilling Company v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company
See also Fidelity Mortgage Investors v. Camelia Builders, Inc., 550 F.2d 47, 55 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1093 , 97 S.Ct. 1107 , 51 L.Ed.2d 540 (1977); Cornfeld v. Investors Overseas Servs., 471 F.Supp. 1255, 1260 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd mem., 614 F.2d 1286 (2d Cir.1979) 21 683 F.2d 723 (2d Cir.1982) 22 683 F.2d at 728 (emphasis in original) 23 28 U.S.C.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Deak & Co. v. Soedjono (In Re Deak & Co.)
See also Fidelity Mortgage Investors v. Camelia Builders, Inc., 550 F.2d 47, 55 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1093 , 97 S.Ct. 1107 , 51 L.Ed.2d 540 (1977) (the stay “prevent[s] a chaotic and uncontrolled scramble for the debtor’s assets in a variety of uncoordinated proceedings in different courts”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
LaTempa v. Long (In Re LaTempa)
Matter of R & M Porter Farms, Inc., 38 B.R. 88 (Bankr.MO 1984); In re Van Riper, 25 B.R. 972 (Bankr.W.D.WI 1982); 2 Collier on Bankruptcy, supra, at 362-67; see also Fidelity Mortgages Investors v. Camelia Builders, Inc., 550 F.2d 47 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1093 , 97 S.Ct. 1107 , 51 L.Ed.2d 540 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
General Teamsters Local 959 v. National Labor Review Board
See also, for a thorough discussion of the question, Kinty v. United Mine Workers of America, 544 F.2d 706, 716-720 (4th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1093 , 97 S.Ct. 1107 , 51 L.Ed.2d 540 (1977) (issue should not have been taken from the jury); cf. Local No. 24, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America v. NLRB, 266 F.2d 675 (D.C.Cir.1959) (single enterprise found).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Urda
v.
Pennsylvania Farview State Hospital
v.
Pennsylvania Farview State Hospital
No. 76-765.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 22, 1977.
Published
Citer courts: District of Columbia (2)
Sup. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.