green
Positive treatment
3.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Imazio Nursery, Inc. v. Dania Greenhouses, and Coastal Nursery, Jess Rodrigues, and Donna Rodrigues
Although the legislative history does not answer the question of what “variety” means in terms of whether a single plant or a range of plants is protected by a plant patent, in addition to being distinct and new, a patentable plant must also be asexually reproduced. 35 U.S.C. § 161 ; see Yoder Bros., Inc. v. California-Florida Plant Corp., 537 F.2d 1347, 1377 , 193 USPQ 264, 291 (5th Cir.1976) (“For plant patents ... the additional requirement of asexual reproduction is introduced.”), cer t. denied, 429 U.S. 1094 , 97 S.Ct. 1108 , 51 L.Ed.2d 540 (1977); Senate Report at 5 (“It is no…
discussed
Cited "see"
Neumann v. Reinforced Earth Co.
See Yoder Brothers, Inc. v. California Florida Plant Corporation, 537 F.2d 1347, 1369 (5th Cir.1976), ce rt. denied, 429 U.S. 1094 , 97 S.Ct. 1108 , 51 L.Ed.2d 540 (1977); Hiland Dairy, Inc. v. Kroger Company, 402 F.2d 968, 974 (8th Cir.1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 961 , 89 S.Ct. 2096 , 23 L.Ed.2d 748 (1969); cf. United States v. Aluminum Company of America, 148 F.2d 416, 431 (2d Cir.1945).
cited
Cited "see"
Center for Auto Safety v. Department of Justice
See Yoder Bros., Inc. v. California-Florida Plant Corp., 537 F.2d 1347 , 1361— 64 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1094 , 97 S.Ct. 1108, 51 L.Ed.2d 540 (1977). 15 .
cited
Cited "see"
Williams v. Kleaveland
See Yoder Brothers, Inc. v. California-Florida Plant Corporation, 537 F.2d 1347 , cert. den. 429 U.S. 1094 , 97 S.Ct. 1108 , 51 L.Ed.2d 540 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Robinson v. Magovern
Accord, Yoder Brothers, Inc. v. California-Florida Plant Corp., 537 F.2d 1347, 1368 (5th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1094 , 97 S.Ct. 1108 , 51 L.Ed.2d 540 (1977) (as a matter of law, company with 20% market share cannot be guilty of monopolization).
cited
Cited "see"
Associated Radio Service Company, Associated Radio Company v. Page Airways, Inc.
See Yoder Brothers v. California-Florida Plant Corp., 537 F.2d 1347 , 1366 (5th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1094 , 97 S.Ct. 1108 , 51 L.Ed.2d 540 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Dana I. Kestenbaum v. Falstaff Brewing Corporation
See Yoder Bros., Inc. v. California-Florida Plant Corp., 537 F.2d 1347 , 1371 & n.25 (5th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1094 , 97 S.Ct. 1108 , 51 L.Ed.2d 540 (1977).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
U.S. Anchor Mfg., Inc. v. Rule Industries, Inc.
See, e.g., Yoder Bros. v. California-Florida Plant Corp., 537 F.2d 1347, 1366 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1094 , 97 S.Ct. 1108 , 51 L.Ed.2d 540 (1977). 16 1.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
U.S. Anchor Mfg., Inc. v. Rule Industries, Inc.
See, e.g., Yoder Bros. v. Califor nia-Florida Plant Corp., 537 F.2d 1347 , 1366 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1094 , 97 S.Ct. 1108 , 51 L.Ed.2d 540 (1977). 16 1.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Norton Tire Co. v. Tire Kingdom Co.
See, e.g., Yoder Brothers, Inc. v. California-Florida Plant Corp., 537 F.2d 1347 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1094 , 97 S.Ct. 1108 , 51 L.Ed.2d 540 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Argus, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co.
See also Yoder Bros, Inc. v. California-Florida Plant Corp., 537 F.2d 1347 , 1371 & n. 25 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1094 , 97 S.Ct. 1108 , 51 L.Ed.2d 540 (1977) (conclusory statements of plaintiff’s officers do not constitute substantial evidence).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cha-Car, Inc., a Florida Corp. For Profit, Carmine Andrietta, and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated v. Calder Race Course, Inc., Etc.
Compare Yoder Brothers, Inc. v. California-Florida Plant Corp., 537 F.2d 1347, 1364-65 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1094 , 97 S.Ct. 1108 , 51 L.Ed.2d 540 (1977) (per se violation when defendants refuse to deal with boycott victims in order to coercively influence the trade practices of the victims).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Shiley, Inc. v. Bentley Laboratories, Inc.
Compare Yoder Bros., Inc. v. California-Florida Plant Corp., 537 F.2d 1347, 1383 (5th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1094 , 97 S.Ct. 1108 , 51 L.Ed.2d 540 (1977); White v. Mar-Bel, Inc., 509 F.2d 287, 292 (5th Cir.1975); Medtronic, Inc. v. Catalyst Research Corp., 547 F.Supp. 401, 405 (D.Minn.1982) (each holding the jury’s finding to be advisory) with Creative Cookware, Inc. v. Northland Aluminum, 678 F.2d 746, 749 (8th Cir.1982); Norfin, Inc. v. International Business Mach., 625 F.2d 357, 366 (10th Cir.1980) (both holding that the jury’s verdict on willfulness is to be disturbed on ap…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Northeastern Telephone Co. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.
See, e. g., H & B Equipment Co. v. International Harvester Co., 577 F.2d 239, 247 (5th Cir. 1978), citing Yoder Brothers, Inc. v. California-Florida Plant Corp., 537 F.2d 1347 , 1371 & n.25 (5th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1094 , 97 S.Ct. 1108 , 51 L.Ed.2d 540 (1977).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Yoder Bros., Inc.
v.
California-Florida Plant Corp.
v.
California-Florida Plant Corp.
No. 76-766.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 22, 1977.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.