green
Positive treatment
5.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 21 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Baker
But see, Shakman v. Democratic Organization of Cook County, 533 F.2d 344, 352 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 858 , 97 S.Ct. 156 , 50 L.Ed.2d 135 (1976) (court finds city employee had actual notice of injunction issued against city but doubts Rule 65(d) requires him to receive actual notice before he can be held in civil contempt). .
cited
Cited "but see"
Lee v. Ohio Casualty Insurance
But cf., Rosario v. American Export-Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc., 531 F.2d 1227, 1233 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 857 , 97 S.Ct. 156 , 50 L.Ed.2d 135 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Schwartzman v. Carmen
See Rosario v. American Export-Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc., 531 F.2d 1227, 1233 (3d Cir.), cert denied, 429 U.S. 857 , 97 S.Ct. 156 , 50 L.Ed.2d 135 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bernard v. American Cyanamid Co.
See Shakman v. Democratic Organization of Cook County, 533 F.2d 344, 351 (7th Cir.) (award of attorney’s fees to prevailing party in contempt proceeding in addition to compensatory sanction is proper and independent of damage award), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 858 , 97 S.Ct. 156 , 50 L.Ed.2d 135 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Tetracycline Cases
See Shakman v. Democratic Organization of Cook County, 533 F.2d 344, 351 (7th Cir.) (award of attorney's fees to prevailing party in contempt proceeding in addition to compensatory sanction is proper and independent of damage award), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 858 , 97 S.Ct. 156 , 50 L.Ed.2d 135 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Eli Lilly and Co. v. Medtronic, Inc.
Accord, Shakman v. Democratic Organization of Cook County, 533 F.2d 344, 353, n. 13 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 858 , 97 S.Ct. 156 , 50 L.Ed.2d 135 (1976) ("The orders of the Court must be obeyed, and to absolve a large or small corporate defendant from its responsibilities simply because the corporation has ordered compliance but has not sufficiently policed same, would be to open the door for wholesale disobedience of the Court.”). 10 .
cited
Cited "see"
Bradley, Stephen G., Sr. And Bradley, Stephen M., Jr. And Bradley, Regina and Bradley, Timothy v. United States
See Rosario v. American Export-Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc., 531 F.2d 1227, 1232-33 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 857 , 97 S.Ct. 156 , 50 L.Ed.2d 135 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Graves v. Kemsco Group, Inc.
See Shakman et al. v. Democratic Organization of Cook County, 533 F.2d 344 (7th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 858 , 97 S.Ct. 156 , 50 L.Ed. 2d 135 (1976). *1421 However, this court elects not to impose a separate fine, but rather to determine in a restrained, conservative and reasonable fashion the amount of damages sustained by the defendants, and to award attorney fees and costs.
cited
Cited "see"
Pitcavage v. Mastercraft Boat Co.
See Rosario v. American Export-Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc., 531 F.2d 1227 , 1231 n. 8 (3d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 857 , 97 S.Ct. 156 , 50 L.Ed.2d 135 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Falstaff Brewing Corporation, General Brewing Company S & P Company v. Miller Brewing Company, and Philip Morris, Incorporated
(2×)
See Shakman v. Democratic Organization of Cook County, 533 F.2d 344, 348-49 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 858 , 97 S.Ct. 156 , 50 L.Ed.2d 135 (1976) (whether civil or criminal contempt depends on the nature of the relief requested) (citing United States v. United Mine Workers, 330 U.S. 258, 298-99 , 67 S.Ct. 677, 698 , 91 L.Ed. 884 (1947).
cited
Cited "see"
Northridge Bank v. Community Eye Care Center, Inc.
See Rosario v. American Export — Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc., 531 F.2d 1227 (3 Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 857 , 97 S.Ct. 156 , 50 L.Ed.2d 135 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Northridge Bank v. Community Eye Care Center, Inc., and Third-Party v. Richard E. Galecki, Jonathan N. Weber, John G. Gonis, Arthur M. Greve, Spencer Thomas, and Small Business Administration, Third-Party
See Rosario v. American Export Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc., 531 F.2d 1227 (3 Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 857 , 97 S.Ct. 156 , 50 L.Ed.2d 135 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Baker
See Golden State Bottling, supra, 414 U.S. at 179-180 , 94 S.Ct. at 422 -423 Washington v. Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Association, 443 U.S. 658 , 692-93 n.32, 99 S.Ct. 3055 , 3078-79 n.32, 61 L.Ed.2d 823 (1979). 6 But see, Shakman v. Democratic Organization of Cook County, 533 F.2d 344, 352 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 858 , 97 S.Ct. 156 , 50 L.Ed.2d 135 (1976) (court finds city employee had actual notice of injunction issued against city but doubts Rule 65(d) requires him to receive actual notice before he can be held in civil contempt) 7 In its Memorandum Rega…
cited
Cited "see"
Hahn v. United States
See Rosario v. American Export-Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc., 531 F.2d 1227, 1230-31 (3d Cir.) cert. denied, 429 U.S. 857 , 97 S.Ct. 156 , 50 L.Ed.2d 135 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Gary L. Adams v. United States
See generally Rosario v. American Export-Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc., 531 F.2d 1227, 1234 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 857 , 97 S.Ct. 156 , 50 L.Ed.2d 135 (1976). 16 .
cited
Cited "see"
Cheryl Hodge and Lynette Hodge, by Their Father and Next Friend, Samuel Hodge, and Samuel Hodge, Individually v. Vance Monsanto v. Government of the Virgin Islands
See Rosario v. American Export-Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc., 531 F.2d 1227, 1233 (3d Cir.), Cert. denied, 429 U.S. 857 , 97 S.Ct. 156 , 50 L.Ed.2d 135 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
John Powers v. The Chicago Transit Authority
Squillacote v. Local 248, Meat & Allied Food Workers, 534 F.2d 735, 748 (7th Cir.1976); See also Shakman, et al. v. Democratic Organization of Cook County, 533 F.2d 344 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 858 , 97 S.Ct. 156 , 50 L.Ed.2d 135 (1976). *1363 When the purpose of a contempt sanction is to coerce compliance with a court order the court must consider: (1) the character and magnitude of the harm threatened by continued contumacy; (2) the probable effectiveness of the sanction in bringing about the result desired; and (3) the contemptor’s financial resources and the consequent seriousn…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Donna Hayden, Jacqueline Perry and South Suburban Housing Center v. Oak Terrace Apartments and Oak Maintenance Association and Mr. & Mrs. Benjamin Roscrow, United States of America v. Oak Terrace Apartments and Oak Maintenance Association and Mr. & Mrs. Benjamin Roscrow
We hold that they are not. 7 "In civil contempt proceedings for violations of a consent decree, plaintiffs must prove the violations by clear and convincing evidence in the trial court." United States v. Huebner, 752 F.2d 1235, 1241 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 106 S.Ct. 62 , 88 L.Ed.2d 50 (1985); see also Shakman v. Democratic Organization of Cook County, 533 F.2d 344, 351 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 858 , 97 S.Ct. 156 , 50 L.Ed.2d 135 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hayden v. Oak Terrace Apartments
“In civil contempt proceedings for violations of a consent decree, plaintiffs must prove the violations by clear and convincing evidence in the trial court.” United States v. Huebner, 752 F.2d 1235, 1241 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 106 S.Ct. 62 , 88 L.Ed.2d 50 (1985); see also Shakman v. Democratic Organization of Cook County, 533 F.2d 344, 351 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 858 , 97 S.Ct. 156 , 50 L.Ed.2d 135 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ferrell v. Pierce
See, e.g., Shakman v. Democratic Organization of Cook County, 533 F.2d 344, 351 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 858 , 97 S.Ct. 156 , 50 L.Ed.2d 135 (1976); Vertex Distributing Inc. v. Falcon Foam Plastics, Inc., 689 F.2d 885, 892 (9th Cir.1982); United States v. Greyhound Corp., 363 F.Supp. 525, 570 (N.D.Ill.1973), aff’d, 508 F.2d 529 (7th Cir. 1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Riverway Company v. Trumbull River Services, Inc., Defendant-Third Party Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Cairo Marine Service, Inc., Third Party
(2×)
See also Rosario v. American Export-Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc., 531 F.2d 1227, 1231-32 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 857 , 97 S.Ct. 156 , 50 L.Ed.2d 135 (1976); Tri-State Oil Tool Industries, Inc. v. Delta Marine Drilling Company, 410 F.2d 178, 186-87 (5th Cir. 1969); MISR Insurance Company v. M-V Har Sinai, 80 F.R.D. 438, 440 (S.D.N.Y.1978); Northern Contracting Co. v. C.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kolodziej
v.
Local 697, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers
v.
Local 697, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers
No. 76-9.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1976.
Published
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied;