green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.8 score
“the court may make its determination on its own motion____”
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 39 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Jenkins v. Massinga
the court may make its determination on its own motion____
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Green v. Williams
(2×)
Furthermore, while actions such as this, involving claims of conduct taken against persons on account of their race “ * * * are often by their very nature class suits, involving classwide wrongs * * *,” careful attention to the requirements of Rule 23, supra, “ * * * remains nonetheless indispensable. * * * ” East Texas Motor Freight v. Rodriguez, supra, 431 U.S. at 405, 97 S.Ct. at 1897, 52 L.Ed.2d at 463[5].
cited
Cited "see"
United Steel, Paper & Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial & Service Workers International Union v. Kelsey-Hayes Co.
See Senter v. General Motors Corp., 532 F.2d 511 , 523 n. 24 (6th Cir.1976), cert. denied 429 U.S. 870 , 97 S.Ct. 182 , 50 L.Ed.2d 150 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Michigan Welfare Rights Organization v. Dempsey
See Senter v. General Motors Corp., 532 F.2d 511 (6th Cir. 1976), cert. denied 429 U.S. 870 , 97 S.Ct. 182 , 50 L.Ed.2d 150 ; Garrett v. City of Hamtramck, 503 F.2d 1236 (6th Cir. 1974).
cited
Cited "see"
In re Cincinnati Radiation Litigation
See Senter v. General Motors Corp., 532 F.2d 511 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 870 , 97 S.Ct. 182 , 50 L.Ed.2d 150 (1976); Mayo v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 148 F.R.D. 576 (S.D.Ohio 1993).
cited
Cited "see"
Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc. v. Smith
See Senter v. General Motors Corp., 532 F.2d 511 (6th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S, 870, 97 S.Ct. 182 , 50 L.Ed.2d 150 (1976); Weathers v. Peters Realty Corp., 499 F.2d 1197 (6th Cir. 1974).
cited
Cited "see"
Fuller v. Fruehauf Trailer Corp.
See Senter v. General Motors Corp., 532 F.2d 511, 525 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 870 , 97 S.Ct. 182 , 50 L.Ed.2d 150 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Huguley v. General Motors Corp.
See Senter v. General Motors, 532 F.2d 511 (6th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 870 , 97 S.Ct. 182 , 50 L.Ed.2d 150 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Haskell v. Washington Township
See Senter v. General Motors Corp., 532 F.2d 511 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 870 , 97 S.Ct. 182 , 50 L.Ed.2d 150 (1976); United States v. Masonry Contractors Assoc. of Memphis, 497 F.2d 871 (6th Cir.1974); Crawford v. Zeitler, 326 F.2d 119, 121 (6th Cir.1964); see also Banks v. Chesapeake & Potomac Tel.
discussed
Cited "see"
Haskell v. Washington Township
See Senter v. General Motors Corp., 532 F.2d 511 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 870 , 97 S.Ct. 182 , 50 L.Ed.2d 150 (1976); United States v. Masonry Contractors Assoc. of Memphis, 497 F.2d 871 (6th Cir.1974); Crawford v. Zeitler, 326 F.2d 119, 121 (6th Cir.1964); see also Banks v. Chesapeake & Potomac Tel.
cited
Cited "see"
Alexander Grant & Co. v. McAlister
See Senter v. General Motors Corp., 532 F.2d 511, 522 (6th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 870 , 97 S.Ct. 182 , 50 L.Ed.2d 150 (1976); Consumers Power, 105 F.R.D. at 600 .
cited
Cited "see"
Thonen v. McNeil-Akron, Inc.
See Senter v. General Motors Corp., 532 F.2d 511, 522 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 870 , 97 S.Ct. 182 , 50 L.Ed.2d 150 (1976); Rettig v. Kent City School District, 94 F.R.D. 12 (N.D.Ohio 1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
In re Consumers Power Co. Securities Litigation
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Senter v. General Motors Corp., 532 F.2d 511, 523, n. 24 (6th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 870 , 97 S.Ct. 182 , 50 L.Ed.2d 150 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Michael McCarthy Arthur Waskow v. Richard G. Kleindienst
(2×)
See Senter v. General Motors Corp., 532 F.2d 511, 521 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 870 , 97 S.Ct. 182 , 50 L.Ed.2d 150 (1976); see also Larionoff v. United States, 533 F.2d 1167, 1183 (D.C.Cir.1976) ("absent some showing of actual prejudice either to the Government or to the absent class members, we cannot conclude that the simultaneous entry of the judgment and the class action certification was reversible error."); see generally 7A C.
cited
Cited "see"
Jackshaw Pontiac, Inc. v. Cleveland Press Publishing Co.
See Senter v. General Motors Corp., 532 F.2d 511, 522 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 870 , 97 S.Ct. 182 , 50 L.Ed.2d 1150 (1976); Rettig v. Kent City School District, 94 F.R.D. 12 (N.D.Ohio1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Peters v. Lieuallen
See Senter v. General Motors, 532 F.2d 511, 528 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 870 , 97 S.Ct. 182 , 50 L.Ed.2d 150 (1976); Rowe v. General Motors, 457 F.2d 348 (5th Cir.1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fitzgerald v. Schweiker
See Senter v. General Motors Corporation, 532 F.2d 511 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 870 , 97 S.Ct. 182 , 50 L.Ed.2d 150 (1976) (held numerosity requirement met where class consisted of all Black employees who were denied promotional opportunities and where plaintiff showed that during the relevant period Blacks represented 14% of the defendant’s workforce).
cited
Cited "see"
Nash v. City of Oakwood
See, Senter, supra, 532 F.2d 511, 524 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 870 , 97 S.Ct. 182 , 50 L.Ed.2d 150 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Williams v. Hoffmeister
See Senter v. General Motors Corp., 532 F.2d 511 , 528—530 (6th Cir.) cert. denied, 429 U.S. 870 , 97 S.Ct. 182 , 50 L.Ed.2d 150 (1976); Rowe v. General Motors Corporation, 457 F.2d 348, 358-359 (5th Cir. 1972); Saracini v. Missouri Pac.
discussed
Cited "see"
Marvin Jones, on His Own Behalf and on Behalf of Those Similarly Situated v. Fred R. Diamond
(2×)
See Senter v. General Motors Corp., 532 F.2d 511, 525 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 870 , 97 S.Ct. 182 , 50 L.Ed.2d 150 (1976); 7A C.
cited
Cited "see"
Edmondson v. Simon
See Senter v. General Motors Corp., 532 F.2d 511 , 525 n.31 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 870 , 97 S.Ct. 182 , 50 L.Ed.2d 150 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Joe R. Brown v. Britt O. Braddick, Joe R. Brown v. Britt O. Braddick
See Sheehan v. Doyle, 529 F.2d 38 , 39 n.* (CA1), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 870 , 97 S.Ct. 182 , 50 L.Ed.2d 150 (1976). 3 . § 24.
discussed
Cited "see"
Lloyd T. Griffin v. Robert F. Burns, Etc., Thomas A. McCormick
But not all class members need “be aggrieved by or desire to challenge defendant’s conduct in order for some to seek relief under (b)(2).” 7A Wright and Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure, Civil: § 1775 at 21 (1972); Davis v. Weir, 497 F.2d 139, 146-47 (5th Cir. 1974); Norwalk CORE v. Norwalk Redevelopment Agency, 395 F.2d 920, 937 (2d Cir. 1968); see Senter v. General Motors Corp., 532 F.2d 511, 523-25 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 870 , 97 S.Ct. 182 , 50 L.Ed.2d 150 (1976).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Scott v. Eastman Chemical Co.
See, e.g., Senter v. General Motors Corp., 532 F.2d 511, 528-29 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 870 , 97 S.Ct. 182 , 50 L.Ed.2d 150 (1976); Shack v. Southworth, 521 F.2d 51, 55-56 (6th Cir.1975).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re CommonPoint Mortgage Co.
See also Senter v. General Motors Corp., 532 F.2d 511, 522 (6th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 870 , 97 S.Ct. 182 , 50 L.Ed.2d 150 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bremiller v. Cleveland Psychiatric Institute
See, e.g., Senter v. General Motors Corporation, 532 F.2d 511 (6th Cir.), cert, denied, 429 U.S. 870 , 97 S.Ct. 182 , 50 L.Ed.2d 150 (1976) (held numerosity requirement met where class consisted of all black employees who were denied promotional opportunities by defendant); Cook v. Rockwell International Corporation, 151 F.R.D. 378 (D.Colo.1993); Orantes-Hernandez v. Smith, 541 F.Supp. 351, 370 (C.D.Ca.1982) (“Where the exact size of the class is unknown but general knowledge and common sense indicate that it is large, the numerosity requirement is satisfied.”); Fitzgerald v. Schweiker, 53…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Powder River Basin Resource Council v. Babbitt
The Fifth Circuit recently followed this language in a federal question case, holding that “with all questions of subject matter jurisdiction except mootness, standing is determined as of the date of the filing of the complaint, and subsequent events do not deprive the court of jurisdiction.” Carr v. Alta Verde Indus., Inc., 931 F.2d 1055, 1061 (5th Cir.1991); see also Senter v. General Motors Corp., 532 F.2d 511, 520 (6th Cir.) (“Standing is determined as of the date the suit is filed.”), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 870 , 97 S.Ct. 182 , 50 L.Ed.2d 150 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Powder River Basin Resource Council v. Babbitt
The Fifth Circuit recently followed this language in a federal question case, holding that "with all questions of subject matter jurisdiction except mootness, standing is determined as of the date of the filing of the complaint, and subsequent events do not deprive the court of jurisdiction." Carr v. Alta Verde Indus., Inc., 931 F.2d 1055, 1061 (5th Cir.1991); see also Senter v. General Motors Corp., 532 F.2d 511, 520 (6th Cir.) ("Standing is determined as of the date the suit is filed."), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 870 , 97 S.Ct. 182 , 50 L.Ed.2d 150 (1976). 32 More recently, however, in a case g…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Garrett v. Clarke County Board of Education
See also Mosley v. Clarksville Memorial Hosp., 574 F.Supp. 224, 234 (M.D.Tenn.1983) (plaintiff who asserts no actual injury to himself due to discrimination has no standing to assert a violation of 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5), citing Senter v. General Motors Corp., 532 F.2d 511, 517 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 870 , 97 S.Ct. 182 , 50 L.Ed.2d 150 (1976).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Kuper v. Quantum Chemical Corp.
See also Senter v. General Motors, 532 F.2d 511 (6th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 870 , 97 S.Ct. 182 , 50 L.Ed.2d 150 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Harris v. Beneficial National Bank (In Re Weisbrod)
See e.g., Senter v. General Motors Corp., 532 F.2d 511, 522 (6th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 870 , 97 S.Ct. 182 , 50 L.Ed.2d 150 (1976); Akron Center for Reproductive Health v. Rosen, 110 F.R.D. 576, 580 (N.D.Ohio 1986).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Dante v. Dow Corning Corp.
See also Senter v. General Motors, 532 F.2d 511 (6th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 870 , 97 S.Ct. 182 , 50 L.Ed.2d 150 (1977).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Mosley v. Clarksville Memorial Hospital
See e.g., Senter v. General Motors Corp., 532 F.2d 511, 517 (6th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 870 , 97 S.Ct. 182 , 50 L.Ed.2d 150 (1976).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Richard D. ROWE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CLEVELAND PNEUMATIC COMPANY, NUMERICAL CONTROL, INC., Defendant-Appellee
See, e.g., Senter v. General Motors Corp., 532 F.2d 511, 528-29 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 870 , 97 S.Ct. 182 , 50 L.Ed.2d 150 (1976); Shack v. Southworth, 521 F.2d 51, 55-56 (6th Cir. 1975).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Cooper v. University of Texas at Dallas
See also Senter v. General Motors Corp., 532 F.2d 511, 527 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 870 , 97 S.Ct. 182 , 50 L.Ed.2d 150 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Local 194, Retail Wholesale & Department Store Union v. Standard Brands, Inc.
See e. g., Senter v. General Motors Company, 532 F.2d 511 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 870 , 97 S.Ct. 182 , 50 L.Ed.2d 150 (1976); Rich v. Martin Marietta Corp., 522 F.2d 333 (10th Cir. 1975); Barnett v. W.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Marvin Jones, on His Own Behalf and on Behalf of Those Similarly Situated v. Fred R. Diamond, Etc.
(2×)
See, e. g., Senter v. General Motors Corp., 6 Cir. 1976, 532 F.2d 511, 525 , cert. denied, 429 U.S. 870 , 97 S.Ct. 182 , 50 L.Ed.2d 150 ; 7A C.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
I.M.A.G.E. v. Bailar
See also Senter v. General Motors Corp., 532 F.2d 511, 517-18 (6th Cir. 1976), cert, denied, 429 U.S. 870 , 97 S.Ct. 182 , 50 L.Ed.2d 150 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Coburn v. 4-R Corp.
The Court must make a determination “as soon as practicable whether it is to be so. maintained”, Rule 23(c)(1), Fed.R.Civ.P.; See also Senter v. General Motors, 532 F.2d 511 (6th Cir. 1976), cert. denied 429 U.S. 870 , 97 S.Ct. 182 , 50 L.Ed.2d 150 (1977).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Carter
v.
American Bar Assn.
v.
American Bar Assn.
No. 75-1731.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1976.
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Powell took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.