green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.5 score
“the fact that a defendant is unable to cross-examine the declar-ant is not always controlling on the confrontation issue since the right of cross-examination is not absolute.”
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 21 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Bellotti
(2×)
the fact that a defendant is unable to cross-examine the declar-ant is not always controlling on the confrontation issue since the right of cross-examination is not absolute.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Jensen
See United States v. Carlson, 547 F.2d 1346 (8th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 914 , 97 S.Ct. 2174 , 53 L.Ed.2d 224 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Government of the Virgin Islands v. George
See, United States v. Carlson, 547 F.2d 1346, 1358 (8th Cir. 1976), cert. den. 431 U.S. 914 , 97 S. Ct. 2174 , 53 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Tony E. Emery
See United States v. Carlson, 547 F.2d 1346, 1359 (8th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 914 , 97 S.Ct. 2174 , 53 L.Ed.2d 224 (1977); see also, e.g., United States v. White, 116 F.3d 903, 911 (D.C.Cir.1997) (per curiam), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 118 S.Ct. 390 , 391, 139 L.Ed.2d 305 (1997), and United States v. Houlihan, 92 F.3d 1271, 1279-80 (1st Cir.1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1118 , 117 S.Ct. 963 , 136 L.Ed.2d 849 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Allen
See United States v. Carlson, 547 F.2d 1346, 1355 (8th Cir.1976) (purpose of no *174 tice requirement is to give adverse party adequate time to prepare to contest use of the statement), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 914 , 97 S.Ct. 2174 , 53 L.Ed.2d 224 (1977); Robinson, 153 Ariz. at 202 , 735 P.2d at 812 .
cited
Cited "see"
Honeycutt v. State
See United States v. Carlson, 547 F.2d 1346, 1358 (8th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 914 , 97 S.Ct. 2174 , 53 L.Ed.2d 224 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Robinson
See United States v. Carlson, 547 F.2d 1346, 1355 (8th Cir.1976) (purpose of notice requirement is to give adverse party adequate time to prepare to contest use of the statement), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 914 , 97 S.Ct. 2174 , 53 L.Ed.2d 224 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Eduardo Jaime Rouco
See United States v. Carlson, 547 F.2d 1346, 1355 (8th Cir.1976) (two days’ notice permissible), cert. *995 denied, 431 U.S. 914 , 97 S.Ct. 2174 , 53 L.Ed.2d 224 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Brown
(2×)
See United States v. Carlson, 547 F.2d 1346, 1355 (8th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 914 , 97 S.Ct. 2174 , 53 L.Ed.2d 224 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
W. Reid Wright Bessie B. Wright and Reid Wright, Jr. v. Farmers Co-Op of Arkansas and Oklahoma
See generally United States v. Carlson, 547 F.2d 1346, 1353-55 (8th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 914 , 97 S.Ct. 2174 , 53 L.Ed.2d 224 (1977). 7 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jerry Lee Wilson, Norman Karl Scott v. United States
Accord United States v. Carlson, 547 F.2d 1346, 1361 (8th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 914 , 97 S.Ct. 2174 , 53 L.Ed.2d 224 (1977); United States v. Darnell, supra, 545 , F.2d at 598 99.
cited
Cited "see"
James Willis Black v. Frank W. Woods, Warden and Warren Spannaus, Attorney General of the State of Minnesota
See United States v. Carlson, 547 F.2d 1346 (8th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 914 , 97 S.Ct. 2174 , 53 L.Ed.2d 224 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Phillip R. Balano
(2×)
See United States v. Carlson, 547 F.2d 1346, 1357 (8th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 914 , 97 S.Ct. 2174 , 53 L.Ed.2d 224 (1977); United States v. Fiore, 443 F.2d 112, 115 (2d Cir. 1971).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Turner
See United States v. Carlson, 547 F.2d 1346 , 1354 n.4 (8th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 914 , 97 S.Ct. 2174 , 53 L.Ed.2d 224 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Herbert A. Howard and Elmer Gary Ritter
Accord United States v. Carlson, 547 F.2d 1346 , 1359 n.13 (8th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 914 , 97 S.Ct. 2174 , 53 L.Ed.2d 224 (1977) (stating that section 1503 proscribes “the directing of threats against witnesses or otherwise impeding the administration of justice”).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Cole
R.Evid. 804(a)(2); see also United States v. Carlson, 547 F.2d 1346, 1354 (8th Cir.1976), ce rt. denied, 431 U.S. 914 , 97 S.Ct. 2174 , 53 L.Ed.2d 224 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Williams v. Collins Communications, Inc.
See also United States v. Carlson, 547 F.2d 1346 (8th Cir.), cert. denied 431 U.S. 914 , 97 S.Ct. 2174 , 53 L.Ed.2d 224 (1977); Huff v. White Motors Corporation, 609 F.2d 286 (7th Cir.1979); United States v. Guevara, 598 F.2d 1094 (7th Cir.1979); Castilleja v. Southern Pacific Co., 445 F.2d 183 (5th Cir.1971); State v. Smith, 315 N.C. 76 , 337 S.E.2d 833 (1985). (5) Generally, the absence of the witness from the jurisdiction alone is not sufficient without further effort to obtain the eviden-tiary support or the direct testimony by “reasonable means.” “ * * * In this case, counsel for Ja…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gallagher v. State
See generally, Roberts, 448 U.S. at 66 , 100 S.Ct. at 2539 , 65 LEd.2d at 608; see also United States v. Carlson, (8th Cir.1976) 547 F.2d 1346, 1355-60 , cert. denied 431 U.S. 914 , 97 S.Ct. 2174 , 53 L.Ed.2d 224 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Hansen
(2×)
See also United States v. Carlson, 547 F.2d 1346 (8th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 914 , 97 S.Ct. 2174 , 53 L.Ed.2d 224 (1977).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Olson v. Green
See, e.g., United States v. Carlson, 547 F.2d 1346 (8th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 914 , 97 S.Ct. 2174 , 53 L.Ed.2d 224 (1977).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Tom Henry Patton
See, e. g., United States v. Carlson, 547 F.2d 1346, 1362 (8th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 914 , 97 S.Ct. 2174 , 53 L.Ed.2d 224 (1977).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Telephone Answering Service Co., Inc.
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
No. 76-1085.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 16, 1977.
Published
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of Minnesota (2)
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.