green
Positive treatment
5.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 20 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Coolman v. United States Internal Revenue Service
See United States v. Silkman, 543 F.2d 1218, 1219-20 (8th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 919 , 97 S.Ct. 2185 , 53 L.Ed.2d 230 (1977); United States v. Daly, 481 F.2d 28, 30 (8th Cir.1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1064 , 94 S.Ct. 571 , 38 L.Ed.2d 469 (1973); Betz v. United States, 753 F.2d 834, 835 (10th Cir.1985); Heilman v. United States, 753 F.2d 33, 34 (6th Cir.1984); Brennan v. Commissioner, 752 F.2d 187, 189 (6th Cir.1984); Martinez v. I.R.S., 744 F.2d 71, 72 (10th Cir.1984); United States v. Neff, 615 F.2d 1235, 1238 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 925 , 100 S.Ct. 3018 , 65 L.E…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Mei-Fen Chen
See United States v. McCoy, 539 F.2d 1050, 1063 (5th *193 Cir.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 919 , 97 S.Ct. 2185 , 53 L.Ed.2d 230 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Phil Pinelli, David Pinelli, Robert Sheehan, Martin Mosko, Thomas Gottone, William Burbidge, and Aaron Mosko
(2×)
See United States v. McCoy, 539 F.2d 1050, 1058 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 919 , 97 S.Ct. 2185 , 53 L.Ed.2d 230 (1977); United States v. Thomas, 508 F.2d 1200, 1203 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 947 , 95 S.Ct. 1677 , 44 L.Ed.2d 100 (1975); United States v. Mattucci, 502 F.2d 883, 890 (6th Cir.1974) (by implication); United States v. Sacco, 491 F.2d 995, 1003 (9th Cir.1974) (en banc); and United States v. Riehl, 460 F.2d 454, 459 (3rd Cir.1972); see also United States v. Avarello, 592 F.2d 1339, 1345 (5th Cir.1979). 53 Here, appellants argue 18 U.S.C.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Joseph R. Carneiro, Terry L. Johnson, George L. Ennis, Larry Emerson, Thomas Francis Begley, Willie Williams, Thomas J. Boyd
See United States v. McCoy, 539 F.2d 1050, 1056 (5th Cir.1976) (wiretap evidence did not need to be suppressed because it was discovered before the wiretap’s goal was achieved), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 919 , 97 S.Ct. 2185 , 53 L.Ed.2d 230 (1977); United States v. Turner, 528 F.2d 143, 158 (9th Cir.) (per curiam) (goal of wiretap was to discover the details of a drug operation and this goal was not yet achieved when incriminating evidence was discovered), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 996 , 96 S.Ct. 426 , 46 L.Ed.2d 371 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rosa
Nye & Nissen v. United States, 336 U.S. 613, 618-20 , 69 S.Ct. 766, 769-770 , 93 L.Ed. 919 (1949); accord United States v. McCoy, 539 F.2d 1050, 1064 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 919 , 97 S.Ct. 2185 , 53 L.Ed.2d 230 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Harvey
See United States v. McCoy, 539 F.2d 1050 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 919 , 97 S.Ct. 2185 , 53 L.Ed.2d 230 (1977). 3.
cited
Cited "see"
Cyrus v. State
See United States v. McCoy, 539 F.2d 1050, 1057 (5th Cir. 1976), cert. denied 431 U.S. 919 , 97 S.Ct. 2185 , 53 L.Ed.2d 230 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Cale
See United States v. McCoy, 539 F.2d 1050, 1054-55 (5th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 919 , 97 S.Ct. 2185 , 53 L.Ed.2d 230 (1977); United States v. Fiorella, 468 F.2d 688, 690 (2d Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 917 , 94 S.Ct. 2622 , 41 L.Ed.2d 222 (1974), reh. denied, 419 U.S. 885 , 95 S.Ct. 156 , 42 L.Ed.2d 128 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. McMinn
See Milanovich v. United States, 365 U.S. 551, 558 , 81 S.Ct. 728, 732 , 5 L.Ed.2d 773 (1961) (Frankfurter, J., dissenting) (“a thief cannot, be charged with committing two offenses — that is, stealing and receiving the goods he has stolenf,] ... for the commonsensical, if not obvious, reason that a man who takes property does not at the same time give himself the property he has taken.”) (citations omitted); Baugh v. United States, 540 F.2d 1245, 1246 (4th Cir.1976) (“logic ... instructs us that there is an inherent inconsistency in treating a taking as a receipt”); see also United …
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Brinks v. State
See also United States v. McCoy , 539 F.2d 1050 , 1057 (5th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 919 , 97 S.Ct. 2185 , 53 L.Ed.2d 230 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Slater
See also United States v. Silkman, 543 F.2d 1218, 1220 (8th Cir. 1976), cert, denied 431 U.S. 919 , 97 S.Ct. 2185 , 53 L.Ed.2d 230 (1977); United States v. Shlom, 420 F.2d 263, 266 (2d Cir. 1969), cert, denied 397 U.S. 1074 , 90 S.Ct. 1521 , 25 L.Ed.2d 809 (1970) ; Wild v. United States, 362 F.2d 206, 209 (9th Cir. 1966).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State, Department of Revenue v. Oliver
(2×)
See also United States v. Silkman, 543 F.2d 1218 (8th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 919 , 97 S.Ct. 2185 , 53 L.Ed.2d 230 (1977). [5] As stated in Hoffman v. United States, 341 U.S. 479, 486 , 71 S.Ct. 814, 818 , 95 L.Ed. 1118, 1124 (1951) (citations omitted): [T]his protection must be confined to instances where the witness has reasonable cause to apprehend danger from a direct answer.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Louis Gresko, United States of America v. Emilio R. \Hambone\" Julian
See also United States v. McCoy, 539 F.2d 1050 (5th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 919 , 97 S.Ct. 2185 , 53 L.Ed.2d 230 (1977); United States v. Leon, 534 F.2d 667 (6th Cir. 1976).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Clements
See, e. g., United States v. McCoy, 539 F.2d 1050, 1063 (5th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 919 , 97 S.Ct. 2185 , 53 L.Ed.2d 230 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Clements
See, e. g., United States v. McCoy, 539 F.2d 1050, 1063 (5th Cir. 1976), Cert. denied, 431 U.S. 919 , 97 S.Ct. 2185 , 53 L.Ed.2d 230 (1977). 59 The term "conduct" as defined adequately reflects the law of this Circuit. 60 Defendants complain that the charge does not focus on issues peculiar to linking two independent gambling operations and that no definition of exchange of line information or lay off bets was given.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Beil
See, e. g., United States v. Silkman, 543 F.2d 1218 (8th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 919 , 97 S.Ct. 2185 , 53 L.Ed.2d 230 (1977); United States v. Jordan, supra; United States v. Daly, 481 F.2d 28 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1064 , 94 S.Ct. 571 , 38 L.Ed.2d 469 (1973); United States v. Porth, 400 U.S. 824 , 91 S.Ct. 47 , 27 L.Ed.2d 53 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Donald D. Johnson
See, e. g., United States v. Silkman, 543 F.2d 1218 (8th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 919 , 97 S.Ct. 2185 , 53 L.Ed.2d 230 (1977); United States v. Jordan, supra; United States v. Daly, 481 F.2d 28 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1064 , 94 S.Ct. 571 , 38 L.Ed.2d 469 (1973); United States v. Porth, 400 U.S. 824 , 91 S.Ct. 47 , 27 L.Ed.2d 53 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. George Williams, Jr., United States of America v. Rosa L. Sumpter, (Two Cases). United States of America v. Lussia Rein, United States of America v. James A. Lincoln, United States of America v. Mary L. Lincoln, United States of America v. Michele E. Lincoln, United States of America v. Albert Lincoln, United States of America v. Norris Dubose, United States of America v. Thelma Dubose
Compare United States v. McCoy, 539 F.2d 1050, 1055-1056 (5th Cir. 1976), Cert. denied, 431 U.S. 919 , 97 S.Ct. 2185 , 53 L.Ed.2d 230 (1977) 73 The applications for the wire interceptions stated that violations of 18 U.S.C. § 1955 (1970) were among the crimes to be investigated.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Williams
Compare United States v. McCoy, 539 F.2d 1050, 1055-1056 (5th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 919 , 97 S.Ct. 2185 , 53 L.Ed.2d 230 (1977). .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Silkman
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 76-6228.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 16, 1977.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.