green
Positive treatment
6.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Sean Robert Mulloy
But see Fruchtman v. Kenton, 531 F.2d 946, 948 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 895 , 97 S.Ct. 256 , 50 L.Ed.2d 178 (1976) (where trial judge interrogated defendant before accepting guilty plea, notice to defendant that he was waiving rights to juiy trial and to "compel the Government to prove ... guilt by competent evidence” cured failure to notify defendant of his right to confrontation and to compulsory process). 5 .
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Kerry M. Gough, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Louis Rosen, D/B/A Walnut Creek Furniture v. Rossmoor Corporation, and Crestmark Carpet and Drapery Company
(2×)
As the Supreme Court stated, in Continental T.V. v. GTE Sylvania, supra : "An antitrust policy divorced from market considerations would lack any objective benchmarks," 433 U.S. at 53 n. 21, 97 S.Ct. at 256.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Francis
See Fruchtman v. Kenton (C.A.9, 1976), 531 F.2d 946 , certiorari denied, 429 U.S. 895 [ 97 S.Ct. 256 , 50 L.Ed.2d 178 ] (1976); Sappington v. United States (C.A.8, 1975), 523 F.2d 858 ; United States v. Madrigal (C.A.7, 1975), 518 F.2d 166 ; Burroughs v. United States (C.A.5, 1975), 515 F.2d 824 ; United States v. Maggio (C.A.5, 1975), 514 F.2d 80 , certiorari denied, 423 U.S. 1032 [ 96 S.Ct. 563 , 46 L.Ed.2d 405 ] (1975); McRae v. United States (C.A.8, 1976), 540 F.2d 943 ; Bachner v. United States (C.A.7, 1975), 517 F.2d 589 ; United States v. Ortiz (C.A.8, 1976), 545 F.2d 1122 .” Stewart,…
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Tuan Quoc Nguyen
People v. Ford, 86 N.Y.2d 397 , 633 N.Y.S.2d 270, 273-74 , 657 N.E.2d 265, 267-68 (N.Y.1995) (citations omitted); accord Fruchtman v. Kenton, 531 F.2d 946, 949 (9th Cir.1976) (holding that an alien defendant need not be advised of deportation as a consequence of a guilty plea, because deportation is a sanction controlled by a federal agency over which a trial judge has neither control nor responsibility), cer t. denied, 429 U.S. 895 , 97 S.Ct. 256 , 50 L.Ed.2d 178 (1976). 4 The same rationale applies to defendants who plead nolo contendere or “no contest” without any warning about the coll…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Clarridge
See United States v. Doulin, 538 F.2d 466, 471 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 895 , 97 S.Ct. 256 , 50 L.Ed.2d 178 (1976); United States v. Tedder, 801 F.2d 1437, 1446 (4th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 938 , 107 S.Ct. 1585 , 94 L.Ed.2d 775 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Sanchez-Guzman
Id.; accord, Fruchtman v. Kenton, 531 F.2d 946, 948-49 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 895 , 97 S.Ct. 256 , 50 L.Ed.2d 178 (1976). 13 Wheth *1005 er such advice need be provided by counsel is another question, and one which will require continued judicial debate to resolve.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Patrick Defillipo and James Defillipo
(2×)
See United States v. Doulin, 538 F.2d 466, 471 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 895 , 97 S.Ct. 256 , 50 L.Ed.2d 178 (1976); United States v. Ragland, 375 F.2d 471, 477 (2d Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 925 , 88 S.Ct. 860 , 19 L.Ed.2d 987 (1968); C.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Epifanio
See United States v. Doulin, 538 F.2d 466 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 895 , 97 S.Ct. 256 , 50 L.Ed.2d 178 (1976): Appellant’s claim that neither federal grand jury before which he appeared had authority to indict him for the substantive offenses about which he has now been found guilty of lying is, even if true, beside the point.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert J. Kehoe
See United States v. Doulin, 538 F.2d 466, 471 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 895 , 97 S.Ct. 256 , 50 L.Ed.2d 178 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Edward Sinclair Williams
See United States v. Doulin, 538 F.2d 466, 471 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 895 , 97 S.Ct. 256 , 50 L.Ed.2d 178 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Jimenez
A consequence has been defined as "collateral” where "it lies within the discretion of the court whether to impose it,” or where "its imposition is controlled by an agency which operates beyond the direct authority of the trial judge." United States v. Kikuyama, 109 F.3d at 537 (cita *889 tion and internal quotations omitted); Beagen v. State, 705 A.2d 173, 175 (R.I.1998) (citations and internal quotations omitted); see also Fruchtman v. Kenton, 531 F.2d 946, 949 (9 th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 895 , 97 S.Ct. 256 , 50 L.Ed.2d 178 (1976). 7 .See, e.g., United States v. Campbell, 778…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Richard A. Nazzaro
See, e.g., United States v. Doulin, 538 F.2d 466, 470 (2d Cir.) (“grand jury’s duty and indeed responsibility to inquire is not coterminous with its power to indict”), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 895 , 97 S.Ct. 256 , 50 L.Ed.2d 178 (1976); United States v. Nickels, 502 F.2d 1173, 1176 (7th Cir.1974) (“grand jury’s scope of inquiry is not limited to events which may result in criminal prosecution”), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 2237 , 48 L.Ed.2d 837 (1976).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Wesley C. Paxson, Sr.
See, e.g., United States v. Doulin, 538 F.2d 466, 470 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 895 , 97 S.Ct. 256 , 50 L.Ed.2d 178 (1976), and cases cited therein.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gotti
See, e.g., United States v. Doulin, 538 F.2d 466, 471 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 895 , 97 S.Ct. 256 , 50 L.Ed.2d 178 (1976); United States v. Ruggiero, 472 F.2d 599, 607 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 412 U.S. 939 , 93 S.Ct. 2772 , 37 L.Ed.2d 398 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Paul A. Russell
(2×)
See, e.g., Fruchtman v. Kenton, 531 F.2d 946, 948-49 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 895 , 97 S.Ct. 256 , 50 L.Ed.2d 178 (1976) (deportation is collateral; requirement that judge inform defendant of possibility would impose unmanageable burdens on trial courts); Michel v. United States, 507 F.2d 461 (2d Cir. 1974) (deportation is collateral because it is not meted out by sentencing judge, but rather occurs in separate administrative civil proceedings); cf. United States v. Santelises, 476 F.2d 787, 790 (2d Cir. 1973) (same analysis under Due Process Clause).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Paschal Demauro
Compare Mancuso, supra, 485 F.2d at 280-81 , where we stated that the issue is “. . .to determine whether a truthful answer could conceivably have aided the grand jury investigation.” (emphasis supplied) In Mancuso, supra, and United States v. Doulin, 538 F.2d 466, n. 3 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 895 , 97 S.Ct. 256 , 50 L.Ed.2d 178 (1976), we found it unnecessary to decide the question of whether Freedman , which involved a claim of perjury in an SEC proceeding, applied in the context of a grand jury investigation.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Alan Gene Kincade v. United States
(2×)
See, e. g., Fruchtman v. Kenton, 531 F.2d 946, 948 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 895 , 97 S.Ct. 256 , 50 L.Ed.2d 178 (1976).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Patriarca
v.
Taylor
v.
Taylor
No. 76-23.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 18, 1976.
Published
C. A. 1st Cür. Certiorari denied.