green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
9.8 score
“the factfinder weighs all of the circumstances of a case in deciding whether a restrictive practice should be prohibited as imposing an unreasonable restraint on competition”
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 34 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Glenn v. Diabetes Treatment Centers of America, Inc.
the factfinder weighs all of the circumstances of a case in deciding whether a restrictive practice should be prohibited as imposing an unreasonable restraint on competition
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Wulf v. City of Wichita
he crucial variant in appears to have been the hierarchial proximity of the criticizing employee to the person or body criticized.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert Dezarn
See United States v. Swainson, 648 F.2d 657, 662 (6th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 937 , 97 S.Ct. 2649 , 53 L.Ed.2d 255 (1977); see also Behrle v. United States, 100 F.2d 714, 715-716 (D.C.Cir.1938); United States v. Beach, 296 F.2d 153, 155 (4th Cir.1961); United States v. Collins, 272 F.2d 650, 652 (2d Cir.1959); Fotie v. United States, 137 F.2d 831, 842 (8th Cir.1943).
discussed
Cited "see"
Biggs v. Village of Dupo
See Sprague v. Fitzpatrick, 546 F.2d 560, 565 (3d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 937 , 97 S.Ct. 2649 , 53 L.Ed.2d 255 (1977) (assistant district attorney’s public accusation that his immediate supervisor had lied “totally precluded any future relationship between him and the defendant”); Egger, 710 F.2d at 321 (evidence of rumors, alleged threats, discord in the office and mutual distrust between the FBI agent plaintiff and others); Foster v. Ripley, 645 F.2d 1142, 1149 (D.C.Cir.1981) (direct attack on superior completely disrupted plaintiffs working relationships and effectiveness).
discussed
Cited "see"
Biggs v. Village Of Dupo
See Sprague v. Fitzpatrick, 546 F.2d 560, 565 (3d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 937 , 97 S.Ct. 2649 , 53 L.Ed.2d 255 (1977) (assistant district attorney's public accusation that his immediate supervisor had lied "totally precluded any future relationship between him and the defendant"); Egger, 710 F.2d at 321 (evidence of rumors, alleged threats, discord in the office and mutual distrust between the FBI agent plaintiff and others); Foster v. Ripley, 645 F.2d 1142, 1149 (D.C.Cir.1981) (direct attack on superior completely disrupted plaintiff's working relationships and effectiveness). 21 No…
discussed
Cited "see"
Elizabeth Dole, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Local 1942, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Afl-Cio
See Usery v. Local 720, Laborers’ International Union of North America, 547 F.2d 525, 527 (10th Cir.1977), certiorari denied, 431 U.S. 938 , 97 S.Ct. 2649 , 53 L.Ed.2d 255 ; Hodgson v. Charles Martin Inspectors of Petroleum, Inc., 459 F.2d 303, 306 (5th Cir.1972); Wirtz v. Continental Finance & Loan Co., 326 F.2d 561, 563-564 (5th Cir.1964); Mitchell v. Roma, 265 F.2d 633, 637 (3d Cir.1959).
examined
Cited "see"
Klaus Zoelsch v. Arthur Andersen & Co
(4×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See SEC v. Kasser, 548 F.2d 109, 115 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 938 , 97 S.Ct. 2649 , 53 L.Ed.2d 255 (1977); Continental Grain (Australia) Pty.
cited
Cited "see"
Lees v. West Greene School District
See Sprague v. Fitzpatrick, 546 F.2d 560 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 937 , 97 S.Ct. 2649 , 53 L.Ed.2d 255 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Kuchka v. Kile
See Sprague v. Fitzpatrick, 546 F.2d 560 (3d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 937 , 97 S.Ct. 2649 , 53 L.Ed.2d 255 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Grunenthal v. Hotz
See SEC v. Kasser, 548 F.2d 109, 114 (3d Cir.) ("The federal securities laws, in our view, do grant jurisdiction in transnational securities cases where at least some activity designed to further the fraudulent scheme occurs within this country."), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 938 , 97 S.Ct. 2649 , 53 L.Ed.2d 255 (1977). 17 We believe that the test used by the Third and Eighth Circuits advances the policies underlying federal securities laws.
discussed
Cited "see"
Grunenthal Gmbh v. Hotz
See SEC v. Kasser, 548 F.2d 109, 114 (3d Cir.) (“The federal securities laws, in our view, do grant jurisdiction in transnational securities cases where at least some activity designed to further the fraudulent scheme occurs within this country.”), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 938 , 97 S.Ct. 2649 , 53 L.Ed.2d 255 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Wood v. Town of Frederica
See Sprague v. Fitzpatrick, 546 F.2d 560, 563 (3d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 937 , 97 S.Ct. 2649 , 53 L.Ed.2d 255 (1977); 5 C.
cited
Cited "see"
Switlik v. Hardwicke Company
See Sprague v. Fitzpatrick, 546 F.2d 560, 563 (3d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 937 , 97 S.Ct. 2649 , 53 L.Ed.2d 255 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Switlik v. Hardwicke Co.
See Sprague v. Fitzpatrick, 546 F.2d 560, 563 (3d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 937 , 97 S.Ct. 2649 , 53 L.Ed.2d 255 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Bernitsky v. United States
See Sprague v. Fitzpatrick, 546 F.2d 560 , 563 n.4 (3d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 937 , 97 S.Ct. 2649 , 53 L.Ed.2d 255 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bernitsky v. United States
See Sprague v. Fitzpatrick, 546 F.2d 560 , 563 n.4 (3d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 937 , 97 S.Ct. 2649 , 53 L.Ed.2d 255 (1977). 36 Accordingly, we will affirm the judgment of the district court. 1 See Dupree v. United States, 247 F.2d 819, 825 (3d Cir. 1957); Jayson, Application of the Discretionary Function Exception, Symposium on the Federal Tort Claims Act, 24 Fed.B.J. 153 (1964); Reynolds, The Discretionary Function Exception of the Federal Tort Claims Act, 57 Geo.L.J. 81, 82 (1968) 2 In support of its Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative for Summary Judgment, the Government pres…
cited
Cited "see"
Tore v. Local 245 of the Jersey City Public Employees Union
See Sprague v. Fitzpatrick, 546 F.2d 560, 563 (3d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 937 , 97 S.Ct. 2649 , 53 L.Ed.2d 255 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
De Tore v. Local 245 of Jersey City Public Employees Union
See Sprague v. Fitzpatrick, 546 F.2d 560, 563 (3d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 937 , 97 S.Ct. 2649 , 53 L.Ed.2d 255 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Esther Atcherson v. Honorable Judge John Siebenmann, Judge of the Juvenile Court, Johnson County, District Court of Iowa, Esther Atcherson v. Honorable Judge John Siebenmann, Judge of the Juvenile Court, Johnson County, District Court of Iowa
(2×)
See Sprague v. Fitzpatrick, 546 F.2d 560 (3d Cir. 1976), Cert. denied, 431 U.S. 937 , 97 S.Ct. 2649 , 53 L.Ed.2d 255 (1977); Abbott v. Thetford, 534 F.2d 1101 (5th Cir. 1976) (En banc ), Cert. denied, 430 U.S. 954 , 97 S.Ct. 1598 , 51 L.Ed.2d 804 (1977); Roseman v. Indiana University of Pennsylvania, 520 F.2d 1364 (3d Cir. 1975), Cert. denied, 424 U.S. 921 , 96 S.Ct. 1128 , 47 L.Ed.2d 329 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Atcherson v. Siebenmann
(2×)
See Sprague v. Fitzpatrick, 546 F.2d 560 (3d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 937 , 97 S.Ct. 2649 , 53 L.Ed.2d 255 (1977); Abbott v. Thetford, 534 F.2d 1101 (5th Cir. 1976) (en banc), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 954 , 97 S.Ct. 1598 , 51 L.Ed.2d 804 (1977); Roseman v. Indiana University of Pennsylvania, 520 F.2d 1364 (3d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 921 , 96 S.Ct. 1128 , 47 L.Ed.2d 329 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Hoopes v. City of Chester
See 412 F.Supp. 910 , 918-19 nn. 28-29 (E.D.Pa.), aff’d, 546 F.2d 560 (3d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 937 , 97 S.Ct. 2649 , 53 L.Ed.2d 255 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Boney v. United States
Accord, United States v. Swainson, 548 F.2d 657, 662 (6th Cir.), cert denied, 431 U.S. 937 , 97 S.Ct. 2649 , 53 L.Ed.2d 255 (1977); United States v. Sweig, 441 F.2d 114, 117 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 932 , 91 S.Ct. 2256 , 29 L.Ed.2d 711 (1971).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Orville S. Clavey
See United States v. Swainson, 548 F.2d 657, 663 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 937 , 97 S.Ct. 2649 , 53 L.Ed.2d 255 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re United States of America, Socialist Workers Party v. The Attorney General
See Usery v. Local 720, Laborers’ International Union of North America, 547 F.2d 525, 527 (10th Cir.), petition for cert. denied, 431 U.S. 938 , 97 S.Ct. 2649 , 53 L.Ed.2d 255 (1977); Hodgson v. Charles Martin Inspectors of Petroleum, Inc., 459 F.2d 303, 306 (5th Cir. 1972); Wirtz v. Continental Finance & Loan Co., 326 F.2d 561, 563-64 (5th Cir. 1964); Mitchell v. Roma, 265 F.2d 633, 637 (3d Cir. 1959); Hodgson v. Keeler Brass Co., 56 F.R.D. 126, 127-28 (W.D.Mich.1972); 8 Wigmore, Evidence § 2374 at 762 (McNaughton Rev. 1961).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Alstom SA Securities Litigation
Citing the congressional policy question as relevant in the context of supporting the exercise of subject matter jurisdiction in another case, the Second Circuit declared that “Congress did not want ‘to allow the United States to be used as a base for manufacturing fraudulent security devices for export, even when these are peddled only to foreigners.’ ” Psimenos, 722 F.2d at 1045 (quoting Vencap, 519 F.2d at 1017); see also SEC v. Kasser, 548 F.2d 109, 116 (3rd Cir.), cert, denied, 431 U.S. 938 , 97 S.Ct. 2649 , 53 L.Ed.2d 255 (1977) (noting that the antifraud provisions of the United…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Zurich Capital Markets Inc. v. Coglianese
Compare Bersch v. Drexel Firestone Inc., 519 F.2d at 987, 993 (2nd Cir. 1975) (conduct in United States must amount to more than just actions which are "merely preparatory,” and not insubstantial when compared with the conduct committed abroad, and the direct cause of the losses sustained by the foreign investors), and Robinson v. TCI/US West Communications Inc., 117 F.3d 900, 905 (5th Cir.1997), with SEC v. Kasser, 548 F.2d 109, 114 (3rd Cir.), cert, denied, 431 U.S. 938 , 97 S.Ct. 2649 , 53 'L.Ed.2d 255 (1977) (jurisdiction where “at least some activity designed to further a fraudulent s…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Baldassare v. County of Bergen
Czurlanis, 721 F.2d at 106 ; see also Sprague v. Fitzpatrick, 546 F.2d 560, 565 (3d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 937 , 97 S.Ct. 2649 , 53 L.Ed.2d 255 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Local 1804-1, International Longshoremen's Ass'n
See, e.g., Usery v. Local Union 720, 547 F.2d 525, 528 (10th Cir.) (“The government recognizes that at an appropriate time, probably in connection with a pre-trial order, it must list its witnesses [whose identity it had previously withheld].”), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 938 , 97 S.Ct. 2649 , 53 L.Ed.2d 255 (1977); Secretary of Labor v. Superior Care, Inc., 107 F.R.D. 395, 397 (E.D.N.Y.1985) (“The Court is aware, however, that the privilege is not absolute and that at some point, defendant’s right to prepare a defense could outweigh the need for the privilege.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
William E. Brock, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Gingerbread House, Inc., Patricia Jo Stone and James Stone, Defendants-Appellees/third Party v. Vicki Blatchley and Beth Nelson, Third Party
We held that in the absence of a showing of substantial need in this discovery stage, the court erred in requiring "the premature identification and designation of trial witnesses" and reversed. 864 F.2d at 678 ; see also Usery v. Local Union 720, Laborers' International Union of North America, AFL-CIO, 547 F.2d 525, 528 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 938 , 97 S.Ct. 2649 , 53 L.Ed.2d 255 (1977) (extraordinary circumstances required to override qualified privilege of informants during preliminary proceedings not determinative of the merits); Usery v. Ritter, 547 F.2d 528, 531 (10th Cir.197…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brock v. Gingerbread House, Inc.
We held that in the absence of a showing of substantial need in this discovery stage, the court erred in requiring “the premature identification and designation of trial witnesses” and reversed. 864 F.2d at 678 ; see also Usery v. Local Union 720, Laborers’ International Union of North America, AFL-CIO, 547 F.2d 525, 528 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 938 , 97 S.Ct. 2649 , 53 L.Ed.2d 255 (1977) (extraordinary circumstances required to override qualified privilege of informants during preliminary proceedings not determinative of the merits); Usery v. Ritter, 547 F.2d 528, 531 (10th C…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Zamboni v. Stamler
In particular, the district court will have to determine whether Zamboni's functional role in the prosecutor's office was of such proximity to Stamler that his speech destroyed "a needed close working relationship." Czurlanis, 721 F.2d at 106 ; see also Sprague v. Fitzpatrick, 546 F.2d 560, 565 (3d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 937 , 97 S.Ct. 2649 , 53 L.Ed.2d 255 (1977). 6 25 Furthermore, in evaluating the disruption, if any, that resulted from Zamboni's criticisms of Stamler's reorganization plan, the district court must consider whether any unrest was caused directly by Zamboni's speech…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Zamboni v. Stamler
In particular, the district court will have to determine whether Zamboni’s functional role in the prosecutor's office was of such proximity to Stamler that his speech destroyed “a needed close working relationship.” Czurlanis, 721 F.2d at 106 ; see also Sprague v. Fitzpatrick, 546 F.2d 560, 565 (3d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 937 , 97 S.Ct. 2649 , 53 L.Ed.2d 255 (1977). 6 Furthermore, in evaluating the disruption, if any, that resulted from Zamboni’s criticisms of Stamler’s reorganization plan, the district court must consider whether any unrest was caused directly by Zamboni�…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Czurlanis v. Albanese
See also Monsanto v. Quinn, 674 F.2d at 994 . 40 In this case, there is no evidence that the relationship between Czurlanis and his immediate superiors was seriously undermined or that the operations of the Division of Motor Vehicles were disrupted--factors that would "weigh[ ] against, not for, first amendment protection in the Pickering balance." Sprague v. Fitzpatrick, 546 F.2d 560, 566 (3d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 937 , 97 S.Ct. 2649 , 53 L.Ed.2d 255 (1977); see also Trotman v. Board of Trustees, 635 F.2d at 230.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
IIT v. Cornfeld
See e. g., SEC v. Kasser, 548 F.2d 109, 116 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 938 , 97 S.Ct. 2649 , 53 L.Ed.2d 255 (1977); United States v. Cook, 573 F.2d 281 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied,-U.S.-, 99 S.Ct. 119 , 58 L.Ed.2d 132 (1978).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Silverman et ux.
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
No. 76-1293.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 31, 1977.
Published
Citer courts: S.D. Iowa (1) · D. Kansas (1)
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.