green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 4×
6.6 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 2007 ·
…a person who was not named in the wiretap order and was not a party to a conversation intercepted during that tap is not an 'aggrieved person' and may not move to suppress information derived from it.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 25 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Funderburk
a person who was not named in the wiretap order and was not a party to a conversation intercepted during that tap is not an 'aggrieved person' and may not move to suppress information derived from it.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Mullen
a person who was not named in the wiretap order and was not a party to a conversation intercepted during that tap is not an 'aggrieved person' and may not move to suppress information derived from it.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Benjamin
a person who was not named in the wiretap order and was not a party to any conversation intercepted during that tap is not an 'aggrieved person' and may not move to suppress information derived from it
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Kaczowski
a person who was not named in the wiretap order and was not a party to any conversation intercepted during that tap is not an "aggrieved person" and may not move to suppress information derived from it.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gotti
See United States v. Fury, 554 F.2d 522, 526 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 433 U.S. 910 , 97 S.Ct. 2978 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1095 (1977); United States v. Hinton, 543 F.2d 1002 , 1011 n. 13 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 980 , 97 S.Ct. 493 , 50 L.Ed.2d 589 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Gallo
See United States v. Fury, 554 F.2d 522, 526 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 433 U.S. 910 , 97 S.Ct. 2978 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1095 (1977). 4.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Gallo
See United States v. Fury, 554 F.2d 522, 526 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 433 U.S. 910 , 97 S.Ct. 2978 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1095 (1977). 4.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Morgan
See United States v. Fury, 554 F.2d 522, 533 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 433 U.S. 910 , 97 S.Ct. 2978 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1095 (1977) and 436 U.S. 931 , 98 S.Ct. 2831 , 56 L.Ed.2d 776 (1978); United States v. Aloi, 449 F.Supp. 698, 727 (E.D.N.Y.1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Texas Oil & Gas Corp. v. Hagen
See Crutcher-Rolfs-Cummings, Inc. v. Ballard, 540 S.W.2d 380 (Tex.Civ.App.—Corpus Christi 1976), cert. denied, 433 U.S. 910 , 97 S.Ct. 2978 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1095 (1977); Export Ins.
discussed
Cited "see"
Velasquez v. Levingston
Rule 279 states in part: “(f)ailure to submit a definition or explanatory instruction shall not be deemed a ground for reversal of the judgment unless a substantially correct definition or explanatory instruction has been requested in writing and tendered by the party complaining of the judgment.” Rule 279, T.R.C.P.; see Crutcher-Rolfs-Cummings, Inc. v. Ballard, 540 S.W.2d 380 (Tex.Civ.App. — Corpus Christi 1976, writ ref’d n. r. e.) cert. denied, 433 U.S. 910 , 97 S.Ct. 2978 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1095 (1977); First State Bank and Trust Company of Edinburg v. George, 519 S.W.2d 198 (Tex.Civ.App…
discussed
Cited "see"
First Nat. Bank of Omaha v. Marquette Nat. Bank
See Central Bank of Clayton v. Clayton Bank, 424 F.Supp. 163 (E.D.Mo.1976), aff’d, 553 F.2d 102 (8th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 433 U.S. 910 , 97 S.Ct. 2978 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1095 (1977) and Mountain Grove Cemetery v. Norwalk Vault Co., 428 F.Supp. 951 (D.Conn.1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
City of Houston v. Riggins
See Crutcher-Rolfs-Cummings, Inc. v. Ballard, 540 S.W.2d 380, 388-389 (Tex.Civ.App.-Corpus Christi 1976, writ ref’d n. r. e.), cert. denied 433 U.S. 910 , 97 S.Ct. 2978 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1095 ; Northshore Bank v. Palmer, 525 S.W.2d 718 (Tex.Civ.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1975, writ ref’d n. r. e.).
discussed
Cited "see"
Campbell v. Davis
See Crutcher-Rolfs-Cummings, Inc. v. Ballard, 540 S.W.2d 380, 388-389 (Tex.Civ.App.—Corpus Christi 1976, writ ref’d n. r. e.), cert. denied 433 U.S. 910 , 97 S.Ct. 2978 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1095 ; Northshore Bank v. Palmer, 525 S.W.2d 718 (Tex.Civ.App.— Houston [14th Dist.] 1975, writ ref’d n. r. e.).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Aloi
See United States v. Fury, 554 F.2d 522, 530-31 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, Quinn v. U. S., 433 U.S. 910 , 97 S.Ct. 2978 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1095 (1977); United States v. Vento, 533 F.2d 838 , 858-59 (2d Cir. 1976); United States v. Principie, 531 F.2d 1132, 1138-39 (2d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 905 , 97 S.Ct. 1173 , 51 L.Ed.2d 581 (1977); cf. United States v. Ventresca, 380 U.S. 102, 108 , 85 S.Ct. 741 , 13 L.Ed.2d 684 (1965); United States v. Lewis, 556 F.2d 385 (6th Cir. 1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Anthony Ricco, A/K/A \Tony Bragiole\""
See United States v. Fury, 554 F.2d 522, 531-32 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 433 U.S. 910 , 97 S.Ct. 2978 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1095 (1977).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Donald Carson, United States of America v. Anthony Gallagher
See, e.g., United States v. Fury, 554 F.2d 522, 533 (2d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 433 U.S. 910 , 97 S.Ct. 2978 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1095 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Angelo Ruggiero, Gene Gotti and John Carneglia
No. 1097, 90th Cong., 2d Sess. 12, reprinted in 1968 U.S.Code Cong. & Admin.News 2112, 2179-80); see also United States v. Fury, 554 F.2d 522, 526 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 433 U.S. 910 , 97 S.Ct. 2978 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1095 (1977), 436 U.S. 931 , 98 S.Ct. 2831 , 56 L.Ed.2d 776 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Torres
As we have stated: “[T]he purpose of the statutory requirements is not to preclude resort to electronic surveillance until after all other possible means of investigation have been exhausted by investigative agents; rather, they only require that the agents inform the authorizing judicial officer of the nature and progress of the investigation and of the difficulties inherent in the use of normal law enforcement methods.” United States v. Vazquez, 605 F.2d 1269, 1282 (2d Cir.1979) (quoting United States v. Hinton, 543 F.2d 1002, 1011 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 980 , 97 S.Ct. 493 , 5…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Torres
As we have stated: 146 "[T]he purpose of the statutory requirements is not to preclude resort to electronic surveillance until after all other possible means of investigation have been exhausted by investigative agents; rather, they only require that the agents inform the authorizing judicial officer of the nature and progress of the investigation and of the difficulties inherent in the use of normal law enforcement methods." 147 United States v. Vazquez, 605 F.2d 1269, 1282 (2d Cir.1979) (quoting United States v. Hinton, 543 F.2d 1002, 1011 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 980 , 97 S.Ct. 493…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Squitieri
See, e.g., United States v. Fury, 554 F.2d 522, 526 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 433 U.S. 910 , 97 S.Ct. 2978 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1095 ; United States v. Poeta, 455 F.2d 117, 122 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 948 , 92 S.Ct. 2041 , 32 L.Ed.2d 337 (1972); United States v. Ramsey, 503 F.2d 524, 532 (7th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 932 , 95 S.Ct. 1136 , 43 L.Ed.2d 405 (1975); United States v. Suquet, 547 F.Supp. 1034, 1038 n. 9 (N.D.Ill.1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Coastal Distributing Company, Inc. v. Ngk Spark Plug Co., Ltd., and Ngk Spark Plugs [u.s.a.], Inc.
See Reynolds-Southwestern Corp. v. Dresser Industries, Inc., 438 S.W.2d 135, 140 (Tex.Civ.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1969, writ ref’d n.r.e.); see also Crutcher-Rolfs-Cummings, Inc. v. Ballard, 540 S.W.2d 380, 387 (Tex.Civ.App.—Corpus Christi 1976, writ ref’d n.r.e.), cert. denied, 433 U.S. 910 , 97 S.Ct. 2978 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1095 (1977).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Marine
See also United States v. Fury, 2d Cir., 554 F.2d 522, 528-29 (1977), cert. denied 433 U.S. 910 , 97 S.Ct. 2978 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1095 (1977), 436 U.S. 931 , 98 S.Ct. 2831 , 56 L.Ed.2d 776 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. George Williams, Jr., United States of America v. Rosa L. Sumpter, (Two Cases). United States of America v. Lussia Rein, United States of America v. James A. Lincoln, United States of America v. Mary L. Lincoln, United States of America v. Michele E. Lincoln, United States of America v. Albert Lincoln, United States of America v. Norris Dubose, United States of America v. Thelma Dubose
See, E. g., United States v. Fury, 554 F.2d 522, 525-526 (2d Cir.), Cert. denied, 433 U.S. 910 , 97 S.Ct. 2978 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1095 (1977); United States v. Wright, 524 F.2d 1100, 1102 (2d Cir. 1975); United States v. Scasino, supra, 513 F.2d at 51 . 22 Act of Oct. 15, 1970, Pub.L.No.91-452, tit.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ottis v. Haas
See also, Crutcher-Rolfs-Cummings, Inc. v. Ballard, 540 S.W.2d 380, 389 (Tex.Civ.App.—Corpus Christi 1976, writ ref’d n.r.e.), cert. denied, 433 U.S. 910 , 97 S.Ct. 2978 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1095 (1977); Inman v. Padrezas, 540 S.W.2d 789, 797 (Tex.Civ.App.—Corpus Christi 1976, no writ); Whitson Company, Inc. v. Bluff Creek Oil Company, 278 S.W.2d 339, 347 (Tex.Civ.App.—Fort Worth 1955, aff’d, 156 Tex. 139 , 293 S.W.2d 488 (1956).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Williams
See, e. g., United States v. Fury, 554 F.2d 522, 525-526 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 433 U.S. 910 , 97 S.Ct. 2978 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1095 (1977); United States v. Wright, 524 F.2d 1100, 1102 (2d Cir. 1975); United States v. Scasino, supra, 513 F.2d at 51 . .Act of Oct. 15, 1970, Pub.L.No.91-452, tit.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Crutcher-Rolfs-Cummings, Inc.
v.
Ballard
v.
Ballard
No. 76-1619.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 27, 1977.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Citer courts: W.D. New York (4)
Ct. Civ. App. Tex., 13th Sup. Jud. Dist. Certiorari denied.