green
Positive treatment
4.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 20 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Jeffrey R. MacDonald
(2×)
But cf. Lowery v. State of Maryland, 401 F.Supp. 604, 607 (D.Md.1975), aff’d without published opinion, 532 F.2d 750 (4th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 919 , 97 S.Ct. 312 , 50 L.Ed.2d 285 (1976).
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Mary Sue Hubbard, United States of America v. Mary Sue Hubbard Church of Scientology of California, Church of Scientology of California v. United States of America
But see United States v. Eisner, 533 F.2d 987, 994 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 919 , 97 S.Ct. 314 , 50 L.Ed.2d 286 (1976) (dictum) (better to hold evidentiary hearing before entering exclusionary order in criminal case); United States ex rel.
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Hubbard
But see United States v. Eisner, 533 F.2d 987, 994 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 919 , 97 S.Ct. 314 , 50 L.Ed.2d 286 (1976) (dictum) (better to hold evidentiary hearing before entering exclusionary order in criminal case); United States ex rel.
cited
Cited "see"
Peeler v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Duval County)
See. e.g., United States v. Eisner, 533 F.2d 987, 993-94 (6th Cir. 1976) (To protect witness who feared testifying in public), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 919 (1976); United States ex rel.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Alex C. Uwaje
Circumstantial evidence may support a conviction; see United States v. Eisner, 533 F.2d 987, 989 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 919 (1976); and such evidence need not remove every reasonable hypothesis except that of guilt.
cited
Cited "see"
Vuono v. New York Blood Center, Inc.
See United States v. Hall, 424 F.Supp. 508, 534 (D.Okla.1975), aff'd, 536 F.2d 313 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 919 , 97 S.Ct. 313 , 50 L.Ed. 2d 285 (1976). 4 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. International Business MacHines Corp.
See United States v. Hall, 424 F.Supp. 508 (D.C.Okl.), aff’d, 536 F.2d 313 (10th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 919 , 97 S.Ct. 313 , 50 L.Ed.2d 285 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Silas Jones
See United States v. Eisner, 533 F.2d 987, 992-93 (6th Cir.) cert. denied 429 U.S. 919 , 97 S.Ct. 314 , 50 L.Ed.2d 286 (1976); United States v. LeFaivre, 507 F.2d 1288, 1293 (4th Cir. 1974), cert. denied 420 U.S. 1004 , 95 S.Ct. 1446 , 43 L.Ed.2d 762 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Raymond Boyd, Jr.
See U. S. v. Eisner, 533 F.2d 987 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 919 , 97 S.Ct 314 , 50 L.Ed.2d 286 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert McPartlin
(2×)
See United States v. Hall, 536 F.2d 313, 321 (10th Cir. 1976), Cert. denied, 429 U.S. 919 , 97 S.Ct. 313 , 50 L.Ed.2d 285 (1977) ("bribery and extortion are not to be considered mutually exclusive nor does the fact that the alleged victims of the extortion were also bribers nullify anything."); United States v. Gill, 490 F.2d 233 (7th Cir. 1973), Cert. denied, 417 U.S. 968 , 94 S.Ct. 3171 , 41 L.Ed.2d 1139 (1974) 22 See note 20 Supra 23 United States v. Peskin, 527 F.2d 71, 84 (7th Cir. 1975), Cert. denied, 429 U.S. 818 , 97 S.Ct. 63 , 50 L.Ed.2d 79 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Luke A. Nelligan
See United States v. Hall, 10 Cir., 536 F.2d 313, 327 , cert. denied, 429 U.S. 919 , 97 S.Ct. 313 , 50 L.Ed.2d 285 (1976) (finding both prior consent and action under color of law).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bond v. State
In United States v. Young Brothers, Inc., 728 F.2d 682, 691 (5th Cir.1984), the 5th Circuit, relying upon Thomas , again held that the “requirement [that the declarant take the stand, assert the privilege and the court recognize it] need not be met when its fulfillment would be a mere ‘formalism.’ ” In United States v. Brainard, 690 F.2d 1117 (4th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1099 , 105 S.Ct. 2320 , 85 L.Ed.2d 839 (1985), the 4th Circuit considered a proffer by appellant’s attorney that “I will advise him and he will accept my advice to claim the privilege of the Fifth Amendm…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Daniel Chalan, Jr.
The settled rule in this circuit is that, “[t]he trial court is vested with wide discretion in the conduct of voir dire, and this discretion should not be disturbed unless there is a clear showing of abuse.” United States v. Lambinus, 747 F.2d 592, 598 (10th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1067 , 105 S.Ct. 2143 , 85 L.Ed.2d 500 (1985); see also United States v. Hall, 536 F.2d 313, 324 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 919 , 97 S.Ct. 313 , 50 L.Ed.2d 285 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wesreco, Inc. v. United States Department of the Interior
See also Griffin v. United States, 537 F.2d 1130 (TECA), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 919 , 97 S.Ct. 313 , 50 L.Ed.2d 286 (1976) and McCulloch Gas Processing Corp. v. Canadian Hidrogas, etc., 577 F.2d 712 (TECA), cert. denied 439 U.S. 831 , 99 S.Ct. 109 , 58 L.Ed.2d 126 (1978) for the DOI’s contention that § 210 does not constitute a waiver of sovereign immunity for Western’s claims. *570 At this point, before addressing the issue of whether Western can demonstrate a source of law creating a substantive right to sue, it may be useful to review the cases decided by the Temporary Emergency Court …
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Andrews v. Shulsen
See, e.g., United States v. Hall, 536 F.2d 313, 326-27 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 919 , 97 S.Ct. 313 , 50 L.Ed.2d 285 (1976); United States v. Hill, 496 F.2d 201, 203-04 (5th Cir.1974).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Scott Brian Janoe
See also United States v. Hall, 536 F.2d 313, 319 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 919 , 97 S.Ct. 313 , 50 L.Ed.2d 285 (1976).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James Louis Whitt, AKA Jim Whitt
See, e.g., United States v. Hall, 536 F.2d 313, 320 (10th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 919 , 97 S.Ct. 313 , 50 L.Ed.2d 285 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Daniel King Brainard, United States of America v. Halton Q. Bittick, Jr.
(2×)
See also Lowery v. Maryland, 401 F.Supp. 604, 606 (D.Md.1975), aff'd, 532 F.2d 750 (4th Cir. 1976) (unpublished opinion), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 919 , 97 S.Ct. 312 , 50 L.Ed.2d 285 (1976) (where a witness' attorney has indicated that he will assert the Fifth Amendment privilege if called, and the claim of privilege would have merit, the witness is unavailable despite the absence of a formal ruling). 11 The attorney's representation that Moss would claim the privilege, and the district court's statement that the privilege would be available, suffice to constitute Moss an "unavailable witness." …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Philip Milestone
See also United States v. Hall, 536 F.2d 313 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 919 , 97 S.Ct. 313 , 50 L.Ed.2d 285 (1976); Overstreet v. United States, 321 F.2d 459 (5th Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 376 U.S. 919 , 84 S.Ct. 675 , 11 L.Ed.2d 614 (1964). 8 We conclude, therefore, that deleting the reference to Agent Mastrogiovanni in Count III was not an amendment to the indictment and was, at the most, only the removal of surplusage on the motion of the defendant.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Boehm v. Gulf Oil Co. of Pennsylvania, Inc.
Compare Griffin v. United States, 537 F.2d 1130 (Em.App.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 919 , 97 S.Ct. 313 , 50 L.Ed.2d 286 , with Lo-Vaca Gathering Co. v. Railroad Commission of Texas, 565 F.2d 144 (Em.App.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1067 , 98 S.Ct. 1245 , 55 L.Ed.2d 768 for a discussion by the Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals of the relationship between Sections 210 and 211.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Taylor
v.
United States and Hall v. United States
v.
United States and Hall v. United States
No. 76-1; No. 76-11.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 1, 1976.
429 U.S. 919
Published
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.