green
Positive treatment
1.0 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Persico
But see United States v. Edwards, 549 F.2d 362, 365 (5th Cir.) (statement that reward depended on "final results" not sufficient to mandate exclusion of testimony), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 828 , 98 S.Ct. 107 , 54 L.Ed.2d 87 (1977).
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Persico
But see United States v. Edwards, 549 F.2d 362, 365 (5th Cir.) (statement that reward depended on “final results” not sufficient to mandate exclusion of testimony), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 828 , 98 S.Ct. 107 , 54 L.Ed.2d 87 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Williams v. State
See, e.g., United States v. Edwards, 549 F.2d 362, 367 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 828 , 98 S.Ct. 107 , 54 L.Ed.2d 87 (1977); State v. Hart, 72 Ohio App.3d 92 , 593 N.E.2d 463, 467 (1991) ("Courts have previously rejected the notion that the ten-year limitation under Evid.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hakim
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
No. 76-1696.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1977.
Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.