green
Positive treatment
5.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of Catrett
Id., at 157-158 , 98 S.Ct., at 1608-1609. 28 The opinion in Adickes has sometimes been read to hold that summary judgment was inappropriate because the respondent had not submitted affirmative evidence to negate the possibility that there was a policeman in the store.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. King
See United States v. Little, 567 F.2d 346, 348-49 (8th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 969 , 98 S.Ct. 1608 , 56 L.Ed.2d 60 (1978) (trial court properly denied continuance where no showing witness would be available or what his testimony would be); see also Dickerson v. State of Alabama, 667 F.2d 1364, 1370 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 878 , 103 S.Ct. 173 , 74 L.Ed.2d 142 (1982); Hicks v. Wainwright, 633 F,2d 1146, 1149 (5th Cir.1981); Singleton v. Lefkowitz, 583 F.2d 618 (2d Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 929 , 99 S.Ct. 1266 , 59 L.Ed.2d 486 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jerry Winford Pruett
(2×)
See United States v. Little, 567 F.2d 346, 348 (8th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 969 , 98 S.Ct. 1608 , 56 L.Ed.2d 60 (1978) (citations omitted).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Cleo Jackson
See United States v. Little, 567 F.2d 346 , 348—49 (8th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 969 , 98 S.Ct. 1608 , 56 L.Ed.2d 60 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Preston Sellers, United States of America v. Johnnie Caradine, United States of America v. Donald Allen, United States of America v. William E. Jewett, United States of America v. Dennis Lavern English, United States of America v. William James Monroe
See generally, United States v. Little, 567 F.2d 346, 348-49 (8th Cir. 1977), Cert. denied, 435 U.S. 969 , 98 S.Ct. 1608 , 56 L.Ed.2d 60 (1978). 17 In the indictment, specific details as to the role of defendant Donald Allen were not provided except for allegations that as a member of the conspiracy, he sold heroin to Loraine Moomey in February and March 1977.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Sellers
See generally, United States v. Little, 567 F.2d 346, 348-49 (8th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 969 , 98 S.Ct. 1608 , 56 L.Ed.2d 60 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ronald J. Holmes
Holmes argues that the District Court abused its discretion both because it allowed these convictions into evidence and because it did not make an express finding that the probative value of including this evidence “substantially outweighs its prejudicial effect,” as required by Rule 609(b) of the Federal Rules of Evidence. 4 “The weighing of probative value against prejudicial effect [under Rule 609(b)] is committed to the sound discretion of the trial court.” United States v. Foley, 683 F.2d 273, 278 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1043 , 103 S.Ct. 463 , 74 L.Ed.2d 613 (1982); see…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Feeney
v.
Securities and Exchange Commission
v.
Securities and Exchange Commission
No. 77-1096.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 17, 1978.
Published
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.