green
Positive treatment
6.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 22 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
Wentz v. Saxon Mortgage (In Re Wentz)
See Continental Acceptance Corp. v. Rivera, 50 Ohio App.2d 338 , 363 N.E.2d 772, 776-78 (1976), motion to certify appeal to Supreme Court of Ohio denied (1977), cert. denied 434 U.S. 857 , 98 S.Ct. 180 , 54 L.Ed.2d 129 (1977) (allowing a recoupment claim despite the otherwise applicable TILA statute of limitation of 15 U.S.C. § 1640 ).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Computervision Corp. Securities Litigation
See Polin v. Conductron Corp., 552 F.2d 797, 807 n. 28 (8th Cir.), cert. denied 434 U.S. 857 , 98 S.Ct. 178 , 54 L.Ed.2d 129 (1977) (holding that disclosure language bespeaking caution cannot underlie an action alleging fraud); Romani, 929 F.2d at 879 ; I.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Mervyn Harold Cross A/K/A Eric Cross, and Robert Carter Lodge
See United States v. Alfonso, 552 F.2d 605 (5th Cir.) (appropriate to allow expert in gambling to testify with respect to meaning of "gambling jargon” contained in recorded telephone conversations), ce rt. denied, 434 U.S. 857 , 98 S.Ct. 179 , 54 L.Ed.2d 129 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Schwartz v. NOVO INDUSTRI A/S
See Goldman v. Belden, 754 F.2d 1059, 1068 (2d Cir.1985), (quoting Polin v. Conductron Corp., 552 F.2d 797 , 806 n. 28 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 857 , 98 S.Ct. 178 , 54 L.Ed.2d 129 (1977)). 9 .Amended Complaint, at para. 13. 10 .
cited
Cited "see"
James v. State
See Bordenkircher v. Hayes, (1978) 434 U.S. 857 , 98 S.Ct. 663 , 54 L.Ed.2d 604 , McMann v. Richardson, (1970) 897 U.S. 759 , 90 S.Ct. 1441 , 25 L.Ed.2d 763 .
discussed
Cited "see"
ca8 1982
In particular we are concerned with the facts that (1) the class was certified without a hearing by a district court judge, other than the original trial court judge, on the basis of only the amended pleadings and supporting affidavit by the appellee Committee's counsel, and (2) Bishop does not appear to have been a proper class representative under Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(a)(4) at the time of class certification. 18 31 "Initially, we note that a trial court has broad discretion in determining whether a class action may be maintained, and its determination will not be overturned absent a showing that …
discussed
Cited "see"
Bishop v. Committee On Professional Ethics & Conduct of Iowa State Bar Ass'n
In particular we are concerned with the facts that (1) the class was certified without a hearing by a district court judge, other than the original trial court judge, on the basis of only the amended pleadings and supporting affidavit by the appellee Committee’s counsel, and (2) Bishop does not appear to have been a proper class representative under Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(a)(4) at the time of class certification. 18 “Initially, we note that a trial court has broad discretion in determining whether a class action may be maintained, and its determination will not be overturned absent a showing that…
discussed
Cited "see"
City of Fulton v. United States
See California v. United States, 213 Ct. Cl. 329, 341 , 551 F.2d 843, 850 , cert. denied, 434 U.S. 857 (1977); Eldorado Canyon Resort, Inc. v. United States, 209 Ct. Cl. 759 , 760-61 (1976) (order); Broome Constr., Inc. v. United States, 203 Ct. Cl. 521, 530 , 492 F.2d 829, 834 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
I. U. Technology Corporation v. Research-Cottrell, Inc.
(2×)
See Systematic Tool, Etc. v. Walter Kidde & Co., Inc., 555 F.2d 342, 349 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 857 , 98 S.Ct. 178 , 54 L.Ed.2d 128 (1977) (patent for hand-operated tomato slicer; "(district) court ... looked to the knowledge of persons who perform the task of tomato slicing to determine skill in the pertinent art.
discussed
Cited "see"
I. U. Technology Corp. v. Research-Cottrell, Inc.
(2×)
See Systematic Tool, Etc. v. Walter Kidde & Co., Inc., 555 F.2d 342, 349 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 857 , 98 S.Ct. 178 , 54 L.Ed.2d 128 (1977) (patent for hand-operated tomato slicer; “[district] court ... looked to the knowledge of persons who perform the task of tomato slicing to determine skill in the pertinent art.
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. United States
See People of the State of California v. United States, 213 Ct. Cl. 329, 338 , 551 F. 2d 843, 848 , cert. denied, 434 U. S. 857 (1977); People of the State of California v. United States, 547 F. 2d 1388, 1390 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U. S. 824 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Grefco, Inc. v. Kewanee Industries, Inc.
See Systematic Tool & Machine Co. v. Walter Kidde & Co., Inc., 555 F.2d 342 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 857 , 98 S.Ct. 178 , 54 L.Ed.2d 128 (1977); Universal Athletic Sales Co., 546 F.2d 530 (3d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 984 , 97 S.Ct. 1681 , 52 L.Ed.2d 378 (1977); Komline-Sanderson Engineering Corp. v. Ingersoll-Rand Co., 485 F.Supp. 973 (D.Del.1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Walter Metz and Ronald D. Schiller
(2×)
See United States v. Alfonso, 552 F.2d 605, 616 (5th Cir.), Cert. denied, 434 U.S. 857 , 98 S.Ct. 179 , 54 L.Ed.2d 129 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Republic Industries, Inc. v. Schlage Lock Company
Popeil Brothers, Inc. v. Schick Electric, Inc., 494 F.2d 162, 167 (7th Cir. 1974); see Systematic Tool & Machine Co. v. Walter Kidde & Co., Inc., 555 F.2d 342 , 348 n.8 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 857 , 98 S.Ct. 178 , 54 L.Ed.2d 128 (1977); Malsbary Manufacturing Co. v. Aid, Inc., 447 F.2d 809, 813 (7th Cir. 1971), (Stevens, J., dissenting).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Kulicke & Soffa Industries, Inc. Securities Litigation
See e.g., Polín v. Conductron Corp., 552 F.2d 797 , 806 n. 28 (8th Cir.) ("language of expectation, of anticipation, and of possibilities recognizes the imponderable influences of complex variables in a fast-changing field.”), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 857 , 98 S.Ct. 178 , 54 L.Ed.2d 129 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Center Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Prudential-Bache Securities Inc.
See also Decker v. Massey-Ferguson, Ltd., 681 F.2d 111, 117-18 (2d Cir.1982) (“economic prognostication, though faulty, does not, without more, amount to fraud”, in the absence of allegations of “particulars” as to why de-clarant’s “stated reliance on those forecasts was false or misleading”), quoting Polin v. Conductron Corp., 552 F.2d 797, 805 (8th Cir.), cert denied, 434 U.S. 857 , 98 S.Ct. 178 , 54 L.Ed.2d 129 (1977).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Consumers Power Co. Securities Litigation
See, e.g., Polin v. Conductron Corp., 552 F.2d 797, 802-03 (8th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 857 , 98 S.Ct. 178 , 54 L.Ed.2d 129 (1977); Zandman v. Joseph, 102 F.R.D. 924, 928-29 (N.D.Ind.1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Cosden Oil & Chemical Co. v. American Hoechst Corp.
See, e.g., Systematic Tool & Machine Co. v. Walter Kidde & Co., Inc., 555 F.2d 342 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 857 , 98 S.Ct. 178 , 54 L.Ed.2d 128 (1977); Komline-Sanderson Eng.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Garbacz v. United States
Compare Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Dep’t of Transp. v. United States, 226 Ct. Cl. 444 , 449 n.6, 643 F. 2d 758 , 762 n.6, pet for cert filed May 23, 1981 (unpublished memoranda and manuals may be incorporated into a Federal Highway Administration Project Agreement even though not formally regulations) and People of the State of California v. United States, 213 Ct. Cl. 329, 338 , 551 F. 2d 843, 848 , cert. denied, 434 U.S. 857 (1977) (same) with Sun City Community Hospital, Inc. v. United States, 224 Ct. Cl. 201 , 206 n.2, 624 F. 2d 997 , 1000 n.2 (1980) (the Medicare Provider Reimbursemen…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Bright
See also United States v. Alfonso, 552 F.2d 605, 616-17 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 857 , 98 S.Ct. 179 , 54 L.Ed.2d 129 (1977).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Bright
See also United States v. Alfonso, 552 F.2d 605, 616-17 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 857 , 98 S.Ct. 179 , 54 L.Ed.2d 129 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Abbey v. Control Data Corp.
See also Polin v. Conductron Corp., 552 F.2d 797, 809 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 857 , 98 S.Ct. 178 , 54 L.Ed.2d 129 (1977); Stadin v. Union Electric Co., 309 F.2d 912 (8th Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 373 U.S. 915 , 83 5.
Systematic Tool & Machine Co.
v.
Walter Kidde & Co., Inc.
v.
Walter Kidde & Co., Inc.
No. 77-75.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1977.
Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.