Missouri v. United States, 436 U.S. 959 (1978). · Go Syfert
Search
Missouri v. United States, 436 U.S. 959 (1978). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“t is the rule of this circuit that the government must adhere strictly to the terms of the bargain it strikes with defendants.”
35 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 16 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Ronald T. Pearce (ca3, 1986-06-12)
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979 2002 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. Ronald T. Pearce
3rd Cir. · 1986 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
t is the rule of this circuit that the government must adhere strictly to the terms of the bargain it strikes with defendants.
cited Cited "see" United States v. Thomas
N.M.C.C.A. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Pitts, 569 F.2d 343 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 959 , 98 S.Ct. 3076 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1125 (1978); Military Rule of Evidence 901(b)(2).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Nathaniel A. Diamond
2d Cir. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Miller, 565 F.2d 1273 (3d Cir.1977) (per cu- *107 riam), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 959 , 98 S.Ct. 3076 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1125 (1978).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Joseph Corsentino
2d Cir. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Miller, 565 F.2d 1273 (3d Cir. 1977) (per curiam), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 959 , 98 S.Ct. 3076 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1125 (1978); but see id. at 1275 (Stern, J., dissenting).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Haley
E.D. Pa. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Pitts, 569 F.2d 343 , 349 n. 10 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 959 , 98 S.Ct. 3076 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1125 (1978) and United States v. Martin, 567 F.2d 849 (9th Cir. 1977).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Jacques
Utah Ct. App. · 1996 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Pitts, 569 F.2d 343, 348 (5th Cir.) (affirming trial court’s exclusion of nonexpert’s opinion concerning signature on a receipt when nonexpert made “one-shot” comparison with a genuine signature for purposes of pending criminal investigation), cer t. denied, 436 U.S. 959 , 98 S.Ct. 3076 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1125 (1978).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Missouri
v.
United States
No. 77-6476.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 12, 1978.
436 U.S. 959
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 66%
Citer courts: Third Circuit (1)

Ct. App. D. C. Certiorari denied.