green
Positive treatment
3.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
American Samoa Government v. Su'a
See United States v. Anderson, 561 F.2d 1301, 1303 (9th Cir. 1977) (per curiam) (upholding verdict that jury reached after "brief deliberation”), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 943 , 98 S. Ct. 438 , 54 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Edward Lee Baker, AKA \Eddie\"
See United States v. Moten, 564 F.2d 620, 627 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 942 , 98 S.Ct. 438 , 54 L.Ed.2d 304 ; 434 U.S. 959 , 98 S.Ct. 489 , 54 L.Ed.2d 318 ; 434 U.S. 974 , 98 S.Ct. 531 , 54 L.Ed.2d 466 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Baker
See United States v. Moten, 564 F.2d 620, 627 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 942 , 98 S.Ct. 438 , 54 L.Ed.2d 304 ; 434 U.S. 959 , 98 S.Ct. 489 , 54 L.Ed.2d 318 ; 434 U.S. 974 , 98 S.Ct. 531 , 54 L.Ed.2d 466 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Casamento
See United States v. Moten, 564 F.2d 620, 627 (2d Cir.) (lengthy, multi-defendant narcotics conspiracy trial not “beyond the ken of the ordinary juror,” since “purchase and sale of hard drugs is basically a simple operation”), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 942 , 98 S.Ct. 438 , 54 L.Ed.2d 304 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Casamento
See United States v. Moten, 564 F.2d 620, 627 (2d Cir.) (lengthy, multi-defendant narcotics conspiracy trial not "beyond the ken of the ordinary juror," since "purchase and sale of hard drugs is basically a simple operation"), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 942 , 98 S.Ct. 438 , 54 L.Ed.2d 304 (1977). 20 The clearest indication that the jury was able to evaluate the evidence, despite its being voluminous, is provided by the jury's verdicts themselves.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Smith
See United States v. Anderson, 561 F. (2d) 1301 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U. S. 943 , 98 S. Ct. 438 , 54 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ahern v. Scholz
Peñagarícano-Soler, 911 F.2d at 846 ; see also United States v. Anderson, 561 F.2d 1301, 1303 (9th Cir.) (holding that jury’s brief deliberation does *786 not indicate it did not give full and impartial consideration to the evidence), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 943 , 98 S.Ct. 438 , 54 L.Ed.2d 304 (1977); Brotherton, 427 F.2d at 1289 (finding that jury deliberation of five to seven minutes did not demonstrate that jury did not consider court’s instructions before reaching verdict).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Raul Enrique Penagaricano-Soler
See, e.g., United States v. Anderson, 561 F.2d 1301, 1303 (9th Cir.) (per curiam) ("brief deliberation”), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 943 , 98 S.Ct. 438 , 54 L.Ed.2d 304 (1977); United States v. Brotherton, 427 F.2d 1286, 1289 (8th Cir.1970) (five to seven minutes); Wall v. United States, 384 F.2d 758, 762 (10th Cir.1967) (one hour); Kimes v. United States, 242 F.2d 99, 100-01 (5th Cir.) (twenty minutes) (order denying rehearing), cert. denied, 354 U.S. 912 , 77 S.Ct. 1299 , 1 L.Ed.2d 1429 (1957). 16 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rastelli
See, e.g., United States v. Moten, 564 F.2d 620, 626-28 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 434 U.S. 942 , 98 S.Ct. 438 , 54 L.Ed.2d 304 (1977); United States v. Shipp, 578 F.Supp. 980, 995-96 (S.D.N.Y.1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Castellano
See, e.g., United States v. Moten, 564 F.2d 620, 626-28 (2d Cir.) (14 defendants), ce rt. denied, 434 U.S. 942 , 98 S.Ct. 438 , 54 L.Ed.2d 304 (1977); United States v. Shipp, 578 F.Supp. 980, 995-96 (S.D.N.Y.1984) (Weinfeld, J.) (13 defendants).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Doherty
v.
Outagamie Bank
v.
Outagamie Bank
No. 77-5517.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 7, 1977.
Published
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.