green
Positive treatment
4.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Watkins
See United States v. Schmaltz, 562 F.2d 558, 559 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 957 , 98 S.Ct. 485 , 54 L.Ed.2d 315 (1977). .
discussed
Cited "see"
George L. Reynolds v. Jack C. Ellingsworth, Warden and Charles M. Oberly, III
(2×)
But cf. Engle v. Isaac, 456 U.S. 107 , 135 n. 44, 102 S.Ct. 1558 , 1576 n. 44, 71 L.Ed.2d 783 (1982) ("States have the primary responsibility to interpret and apply their plain error rules.") 35 In addition, at least two other Courts of Appeals have stated "that federal courts should generally determine questions of procedural default according to the habeas waiver law in effect at the time of the asserted waiver, and that retroactive effect should not be given to such statutes." Spencer, 781 F.2d at 1469 (citations omitted); accord Lumpkin v. Ricketts, 551 F.2d 680 , 682 & n. 2 (5th Cir.), ce…
discussed
Cited "see"
Eduardo Denis v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Etc.
See Lumpkin v. Ricketts, 551 F.2d 680 , 682 n. 3 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 957 , 98 S.Ct. 485 , 54 L.Ed.2d 316 (1978). 5 Similarly, factual assertions that defeat a summary judgment cannot be presented for the first time to an appellate court, DeBardeleben v. Cummings, 453 F.2d 320, 324-25 (5th Cir.1972), and only those matters properly before the district court for summary judgment consideration are subject to appellate review.
discussed
Cited "see"
Leigh v. State
(2×)
See Roberts v. State, 571 P.2d 129 (Okl.Cr.1977), cert denied, 434 U.S. 957 , 98 S.Ct. 485 , 54 L.Ed.2d 316 ; and Hart v. State, 535 P.2d 302 (Okl.Cr.1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Lewis C. Wallace v. A.L. Lockhart, Director of Arkansas Department of Corrections
See Washington v. Estelle, 648 F.2d 276, 278 (5th Cir.1981) citing Lumpkin v. Ricketts, 551 F.2d 680, 683 (5th Cir.1977), ce rt. denied, 434 U.S. 957 , 98 S.Ct. 485 , 54 L.Ed.2d 316 (1977). 5 .
cited
Cited "see"
Hommer v. State
See Roberts v. State, 571 P.2d 129 (Okl.Cr.1977), cert. den. 434 U.S. 957 , 98 S.Ct. 485 , 54 L.Ed.2d 316 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Birt v. Montgomery
Significantly, “an allegation of ineffective assistance is not sufficient to satisfy the ‘cause’ requirement.” Id.; see Lumpkin v. Ricketts, 551 F.2d 680 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 957 , 98 S.Ct. 485 , 54 L.Ed.2d 316 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
M. W. Holloway v. Clay E. McElroy Warden
See Jordan v. Estelle, 551 F.2d 612, 613 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 957 , 98 S.Ct. 485 , 54 L.Ed.2d 316 (1977); George v. Blackwell, 537 F.2d 833, 834 (5th Cir. 1976) (assuming without discussion that new rule should be applied). 53 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Smith
v.
Britt
v.
Britt
No. 77-5196.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 14, 1977.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.