green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.3 score
“he burden on one seeking to prove a waiver of arbitration is a heavy one”
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Lee v. Grandcor Medical Systems, Inc.
he burden on one seeking to prove a waiver of arbitration is a heavy one
cited
Cited "see"
National Foundation for Cancer Research v. A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc., Harold T. Hedges
See Jackson, 636 F.2d at 833 n. 4 (citing Sibley v. Tandy Corp., 543 F.2d 540 (5th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 824 , 98 S.Ct. 71 , 54 L.Ed.2d 82 (1977)).
cited
Cited "see"
Smoky Greenhaw Cotton Co., Inc., and John C. Greenhaw, Cross-Appellees v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Smith, Inc., Cross-Appellants
See Sibley v. Tandy Corp., 543 F.2d 540 , 543 n. 3 (5th Cir.1976), ce rt. denied, 434 U.S. 824 , 98 S.Ct. 71 , 54 L.Ed.2d 82 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Brown v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.
See Sibley v. Tandy Corp., 543 F.2d 540, 544 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 824 , 98 S.Ct. 71 , 54 L.Ed.2d 82 (1977); DeHart v. Moore, 424 F.Supp. 55 (S.D.Fla.1976); cf. Raiford v. Buslease Inc., 745 F.2d at 1421-22 (11th Cir.1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 91,831 Bernice Barbour Raiford, Morgan B. Raiford v. Buslease Inc., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., and Thomas F. Morris, Morgan B. Raiford v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., Bernice B. Raiford v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., Thomas F. Morris, Defendants
See Sibley v. Tandy Corp., 543 F.2d 540, 541 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 824 , 98 S.Ct. 71 , 54 L.Ed.2d 82 (1977); see also, Belke v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 693 F.2d 1023, 1025 (11th Cir.1982); Sawyer v. Raymond, James & Associates, Inc., 642 F.2d 791, 792 (5th Cir.1981) (Unit B); Wick v. Atlantic Marine, Inc., 605 F.2d 166, 167 (5th Cir.1979). 3 It is a judicially created exception to the command of section 3 of the Arbitration Act that the court, on application of a party, shall "stay the trial of the action until [the agreed to] arbitration has been had ...." It…
discussed
Cited "see"
Raiford v. Buslease Inc.
See Sibley v. Tandy Corp., 543 F.2d 540, 541 (5th Cir.), cert, denied, 434 U.S. 824 , 98 S.Ct. 71 , 54 L.Ed.2d 82 (1977); see also, Belke v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 693 F.2d 1023, 1025 (11th Cir.1982); Sawyer v. Raymond, James & Associates, Inc., 642 F.2d 791, 792 (5th Cir.1981) (Unit B); Wick v. Atlantic Marine, Inc., 605 F.2d 166, 167 (5th Cir.1979). 3 It is a judicially created exception to the command of section 3 of the Arbitration Act that the court, on application of a party, shall “stay the trial of the action until [the agreed to] arbitration has been had ____�…
cited
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 91,531 Robert Kershaw and Rob Kershaw v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., a Delaware Corporation
See Sibley v. Tandy, 543 F.2d 540, 542-43 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 824 , 98 S.Ct. 71 , 54 L.Ed.2d 82 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Joseph R. Silvestri
See United States v. Ordner, 554 F.2d 24, 29 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 824 , 98 S.Ct. 71 , 54 L.Ed.2d 82 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Harold F. Mayo, Jr. And Mark A. McGarghan
See United States v. Ordner, 554 F.2d 24, 28 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 824 , 98 S.Ct. 71 , 54 L.Ed.2d 82 (1977); United States v. Cohen, 431 F.2d 830 , 832 n. 3 (2d Cir.1970); United States v. Dehar, 388 F.2d 430, 432-33 (2d Cir.1968).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Olga Valencia and William Suarez Valencia
(2×)
See United States v. Ordner, 554 F.2d 24, 28-29 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 824 , 98 S.Ct. 71 , 54 L.Ed.2d 82 (1977). 38 D.
discussed
Cited "see"
Jacksonville Maritime Association, Inc., Etc. v. International Longshoremen's Association, Etc.
(2×)
See generally Sibley v. Tandy Corp., 543 F.2d 540 (CA5, 1976), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 98 S.Ct. 71 , 54 L.Ed.2d 82 (1977). .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Woodyard v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
See, e.g., Sibley v. Tandy Corp., 543 F.2d 540 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 824 , 98 S.Ct. 71 , 54 L.Ed.2d 82 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Singer v. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc.
Compare Sibley v. Tandy Corp., 543 F.2d 540 , 543 & n. 3 (5th Cir.1976) (claims under 1934 Securities Exchange Act not arbitrable), ce rt. denied, 434 U.S. 824 , 98 S.Ct. 71 , 54 L.Ed.2d 82 (1977) with Raiford v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., slip op.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wise v. Kidder Peabody & Co., Inc.
See, e.g., Sibley v. Tandy Corp., 543 F.2d 540, 543 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 824 , 98 S.Ct. 71 , 54 L.Ed.2d 82 (1977); Greater Continental Corporation v. Schechter, 422 F.2d 1100 , 1103 (2d Cir.1970). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cunningham v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.
See, e.g., Sibley v. Tandy Corp., 543 F.2d 540, 543 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 824 , 98 S.Ct. 71 , 54 L.Ed.2d 82 (1977); Greater Continental Corp. v. Schechter, 422 F.2d 1100 , 1103 (2d Cir.1970); Macchiavelli v. Shearson, Hammill & Co., 384 F.Supp. 21, 27-28 (E.D.Cal. 1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hartford Financial Systems, Inc. v. Florida Software Services, Inc.
See also Sibley v. Tandy Corp., 543 F.2d 540, 544 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 824 , 98 S.Ct. 71 , 54 L.Ed.2d 82 (1977); Janmort Leasing Inc. v. Econo-Car International, Inc., 475 F.Supp. 1282, 1293 (E.D.N.Y.1979); Black v. Econo-Gar International, Inc., 404 F.Supp. 600, 602 (D.Mass.1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States of America, in No. 81-1020 v. Jannotti, Harry P. United States of America, in No. 81-1021 v. Schwartz, George X
See, e.g., United States v. Ordner, 554 F.2d 24, 28 (2d Cir.), *604 cert. denied, 434 U.S. 824 , 98 S.Ct. 71 , 54 L.Ed.2d 82 (1977); United States v. Lemons, 470 F.2d 135 (3d Cir. 1972) (per curiam), cert. denied, 412 U.S. 929 , 93 S.Ct. 2758 , 37 L.Ed.2d 157 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bucyrus-Erie Co. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human Relations
Nachman Corp. v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp., 436 F.Supp. 1334 (N.D.Ill. 1977); see, also, Azzaro v. Harnett, 414 F.Supp. 473 (S.D.N.Y.1976), aff’d., 553 F.2d 93 (2nd Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 824 , 98 S.Ct. 71 , 54 L.Ed.2d 82 (1977). *78 The Wisconsin Fair Employment Act was designed to prevent discrimination in employment.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sibley
v.
Tandy Corp.
v.
Tandy Corp.
No. 76-1614.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1977.
Cited by 6 opinions | Published
Citer courts: D. Colorado (1)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.