green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.7 score
“wjhere there is additional evidence beyond mere purchase and sale, from which knowledge of the conspiracy may be inferred, courts have upheld conspiracy convictions.”
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States of America, Cross-Appellant v. Ricky Allen Hays, Cross-Appellee
(2×)
wjhere there is additional evidence beyond mere purchase and sale, from which knowledge of the conspiracy may be inferred, courts have upheld conspiracy convictions.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
State v. Norflett
Indeed, in summarizing its decision, the Court *280 specifically stated that even before the end of the first trimester “the abortion decision and its effectuation must be left to the medical judgment of the pregnant woman’s attending physician.” 410 U. S. at 164, 98 S. Ct. at 733 [emphasis supplied].
cited
Cited "see"
State v. MacKey
See State v. Linkletter, 345 So.2d 452 (La.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1016 , 98 S.Ct. 733 , 54 L.Ed.2d 760 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ricardo Garza
See United States v. Davis, 564 F.2d 840, 844 (9th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1015 , 98 S.Ct. 733 , 54 L.Ed.2d 760 (1978) (distribution encompasses “ ‘attempted transfer of a controlled substance’ ”) (quoting 21 U.S.C. § 802 (8)).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Joe Henry Carter, Jr., Joseph Estel Hammack
Kuntze v. United States, 488 U.S. 932 , 109 S.Ct. 324 , 102 L.Ed.2d 341 (1988); accord United States v. Stewart, 879 F.2d 1268, 1271 (5th Cir.) (“[T]o warrant a new trial, prosecutorial misconduct ‘must be so pronounced and persistent that it permeates the entire atmosphere of the trial.’ ” (quoting United States v. Blevins, 555 F.2d 1236, 1240 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1016 , 98 S.Ct. 733 , 54 L.Ed.2d 761 (1978))), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 899 , 110 S.Ct. 256 , 107 L.Ed.2d 205 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Taylor
See State v. Linkletter, 345 So.2d 452, 456 (La.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1016 , 98 S.Ct. 733 , 54 L.Ed.2d 760 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. William Waldo Emerson, United States of America v. Scott Wollman, United States of America v. Bruce Ehrlich
See United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1201 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 101 , 83 L.Ed.2d 46 (1984). 21 Congress may provide criminal sanctions for violation of regulations provided that the authority delegated to the executive to promulgate the regulations is "accompanied by sufficient guidelines and standards for the exercise of the authority." United States v. Davis, 564 F.2d 840, 844 (9th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1015 , 98 S.Ct. 733 , 54 L.Ed.2d 760 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Carlin Communications, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
See United States v. Davis, 564 F.2d 840, 843-44 (9th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1015 , 98 S.Ct. 733 , 54 L.Ed.2d 760 (1978). 71 Petition to review denied; mandate stayed for ninety days to permit parties and intervenors to comply with Commission regulations. * Of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation 1 The regulations and a summary of the Third Report were published in the Federal Register on May 12, 1987. 52 Fed.Reg. 17,760 (1987) 2 A summary of the Third Notice was published in the Federal Register on July 28, 1986. 51 Fed.Reg.…
cited
Cited "see"
Carlin Communications, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
See United States v. Davis, 564 F.2d 840, 843-44 (9th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1015 , 98 S.Ct. 733 , 54 L.Ed.2d 760 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Alicia Davis (85-1153), Duane Davis (85-1178), Kenneth Davis (85-1288), Howard Ransom (85-1366)
See United States v. Grunsfeld, 558 F.2d 1231,1238 (6th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1016 , 98 S.Ct. 733 , 54 L.Ed.2d 761 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Howard Eric Genser
(2×)
Accord United States v. Davis, 564 F.2d 840, 844-45 (9th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1015 , 98 S.Ct. 733 , 54 L.Ed.2d 760 (1978); United States v. Rosenberg, 515 F.2d 190, 200 (9th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1031 , 96 S.Ct. 562 , 46 L.Ed.2d 404 (1976). 21 On the other hand, the Third and Seventh Circuits have held that a practitioner who dispenses a controlled substance not in the course of professional practice is guilty of dispensation in violation of section 841(a)(1).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Lester Giles Panter
See United States v. Blevins, 555 F.2d 1236 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1016 , 98 S.Ct. 733 , 54 L.Ed.2d 761 (1978).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Charlie Will Thompson
See also United States v. Blevins, 555 F.2d 1236, 1240-41 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1016 , 98 S.Ct. 733 , 54 L.Ed.2d 761 (1978). *333 The government argues that Fed.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Blevins
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 77-5287.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 9, 1978.
Published
Citer courts: Sixth Circuit (2)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.