green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.4 score
“e can conceive no clearer case of manifest and urgent necessity for a mistrial than that presented to a trial court when it is confronted with a jury which is unable or unwilling to agree on a verdict after due deliberation”
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Donald Holloman, Jr. v. Commonwealth
e can conceive no clearer case of manifest and urgent necessity for a mistrial than that presented to a trial court when it is confronted with a jury which is unable or unwilling to agree on a verdict after due deliberation
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Onyiego
See United States v. Robinson, 553 F.2d 429, 431 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1016 , 98 S.Ct. 735 , 54 L.Ed.2d 761 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Landen Max Dula and Accrabond Corporation
See United States v. Warren, 550 F.2d 219, 227 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1016 , 98 S.Ct. 735 , 54 L.Ed.2d 762 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Landry v. State
See United States v. Gates, 557 F.2d 1086 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1017 , 98 S.Ct. 737 , 54 L.Ed.2d 763 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
City of Kansas City v. Kinsman
See, State v. Brooks, 551 S.W.2d 634, 659-60 (Mo.App.1977), cert. denied 434 U.S. 1017 , 98 S.Ct. 736 , 54 L.Ed.2d 763 , where the court held the thrust of Pearce is to make sure vindictiveness plays no part in judicial resentencing which is not based on an articulated resentment of the judge, and that the state can’t exercise “naked power” in imposing a more severe sentence, thus chilling the defendant’s right to appeal.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Thomas Burgess
(2×)
See United States v. Warren, 550 F.2d 219, 227 (5th Cir. 1977), modified enbanc, 578 F.2d 1058, 1076 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1016 , 98 S.Ct. 735 , 54 L.Ed.2d 762 (1978).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Everett W. Thompson, Jr.
See, e.g., United States v. Kelly, 556 F.2d 257, 263 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1017 , 98 S.Ct. 737 , 54 L.Ed.2d 763 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
John Indiviglio v. United States
(2×)
See, e. g., Gates v. Henderson, 568 F.2d 830, 840 (2d Cir. 1977) (en banc), Cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1017 , 98 S.Ct. 737 , 54 L.Ed.2d 763 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Anthony Dilapi, Robert Rao, Sidney Lieberman, Benjamin Ladmer, Stephen Kingston, David Bergner, and Interstate Dress Carriers, Inc.
See also United States v. Gates, 557 F.2d 1086 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1017 , 98 S.Ct. 737 , 54 L.Ed.2d 763 (1978); United States v. Whitman, 480 F.2d 1028, 1029-30 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1026 , 94 S.Ct. 453 , 38 L.Ed.2d 318 (1973); Alexander v. Fogliani, 375 F.2d 733, 734 (9th Cir. 1967).
Juzenas
v.
City of Southfield
v.
City of Southfield
No. 77-5382.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 9, 1978.
Published
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of Virginia (1)
Cir. Ct., Oakland County, Mich. Certiorari denied.