green
Positive treatment
5.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 22 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited "see"
James J. Nicholson v. Cpc International Inc., a Corporation, and James R. Eiszner
(4×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Rogers v. Exxon Research and Engineering Co., 550 F.2d 834, 841 (3d Cir.1977) (“The thrust of the ADEA’s enforcement provisions is that private lawsuits are secondary to administrative remedies and suits brought by the [EEOC].”) cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1022 , 98 S.Ct. 749 , 54 L.Ed.2d 770 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Baltimore Sun Co. v. Astri Investment Management & Securities Corp. (In Re Astri Investment, Management & Securities Corp.)
See Central South Carolina Chapter, Soc’y of Professional Journalists v. Martin, 556 F.2d 706 (4th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1022 , 98 S.Ct. 749 , 54 L.Ed.2d 771 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Sperling v. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc.
See Rogers v. Exxon Research & Engineering Co., 550 F.2d 834 (3d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1022 , 98 S.Ct. 749 , 54 L.Ed.2d 770 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Haeberle v. Texas International Airlines
See Central South Carolina Chapter, Society of Professional Journalists, 556 F.2d 706 , 708 (4th Cir.1977) (adopting analysis of district court at 431 F.Supp. 1182 (D.S.C.)), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1022 , 98 S.Ct. 749 , 54 L.Ed.2d 771 (1978); T.
discussed
Cited "see"
In re Russell
Accord Central South Carolina Chapter, Society of Professional Journalists v. Martin, 556 F.2d 706 , 708 (4th Cir.1977) (affirming order prohibiting extrajudicial statements by witnesses), cert, denied, 434 U.S. 1022 , 98 S.Ct. 749 , 54 L.Ed.2d 771 (1978); United States v. Tijerina, 412 F.2d 661, 666-67 (10th Cir.), cert, denied, 396 U.S. 990 , 90 S.Ct. 478 , 24 L.Ed.2d 452 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Lacie Russell, Signe Waller, Mark Smith, Dale Sampson, Martha Nathan, Floris Cause, Paul Bermanzohn, Nelson Johnson, Thomas Clark, Frankie Powell, James Wrenn, Donald Pelles, Rand Manzella, Willena Cannon, Allen Blitz, Kate White, and Joyce Johnson
Accord Central South Carolina Chapter, Society of Professional Journalists v. Martin, 556 F.2d 706 , 708 (4th Cir.1977) (affirming order prohibiting extrajudicial statements by witnesses), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1022 , 98 S.Ct. 749 , 54 L.Ed.2d 771 (1978); United States v. Tijerina, 412 F.2d 661, 666-67 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 990 , 90 S.Ct. 478 , 24 L.Ed.2d 452 (1969). 18 Nor is the district court's order rendered unconstitutional because of the alleged lack of an "evidentiary hearing" or of specific, articulated findings.
cited
Cited "see"
Smith v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc.
See Rogers v. Exxon Research & Engineering Co., 550 F.2d 834 (3rd Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1022 , 98 S.Ct. 749 , 54 L.Ed.2d 770 (1978). 2 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. John William Sherman, and Therese Ann Coupez, Seattle Times Company, a Delaware Corporation, and John Arthur Wilson, Seattle Times Company, a Delaware Corporation, and John Arthur Wilson v. United States District Court for the Western District of Washington
See Central South Carolina Chapter, Society of Professional Journalists v. Martin, 556 F.2d 706 (4th Cir. 1977) Cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1022 , 98 S.Ct. 749 , 54 L.Ed.2d 771 (1978); CBS, Inc. v. Young, 522 F.2d 234 (6th Cir. 1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Sherman
See Central South Carolina Chapter, Society of Professional Journalists v. Martin, 556 F.2d 706 (4th Cir. 1977) cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1022 , 98 S.Ct. 749 , 54 L.Ed.2d 771 (1978); CBS, Inc. v. Young, 522 F.2d 234 (6th Cir. 1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wagner v. Sperry Univac, Division of Sperry Rand Corp.
Item (3) clearly exceeds the scope of available relief, for the Third Circuit has explicitly held that the Act does not “authorize recompense for psychic distress attributable to unlawful age discrimination.” Rodriguez v. Taylor, 569 F.2d 1231, 1241 (3d Cir. 1977); see Rogers v. Exxon Research & Eng’ring Co., 550 F.2d 834 , 839-42 (1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1022 , 98 S.Ct. 749 , 54 L.Ed.2d 770 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Holliday v. Ketchum, MacLeod & Grove, Inc.
Accord, Rogers v. Exxon Research & Engineering Co., 550 F.2d 834, 838-40 (3d Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1022 , 98 S.Ct. 749 , 54 L.Ed.2d 770 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Catlett v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.
See, Rogers v. Exxon Research and Engineering Co., 550 F.2d 834, 839-842 (3d Cir. 1977), cert. den., 434 U.S. 1022 , 98 S.Ct. 749 , 54 L.Ed.2d 770 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Cianfrani
Accord, Central South Carolina Chapter, Society of Professional Journalists, Sigma Delta Chi v. Martin, 556 F.2d 706, 707-08 (4th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 98 S.Ct. 749 , 54 L.Ed.2d 771 (1978) (No. 77-263).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Cianfrani
Accord, Central South Carolina Chapter, Society of Professional Journalists, Sigma Delta Chi v. Martin, 556 F.2d 706, 707-08 (4th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1022 , 98 S.Ct. 749 , 54 L.Ed.2d 771 (1978) (No. 77-263). 32 We also believe intervenors to be "proper proponents of the particular legal rights on which they base their suit." Singleton v. Wulff, 428 U.S. 106, 112 , 96 S.Ct. 2868, 2873 , 49 L.Ed.2d 826 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Judson C. Brewer v. Quaker State Oil Refining Corporation Quaker State Corporation
(2×)
See, e.g., Rogers v. Exxon Research & Eng'g Co., 550 F.2d 834 , 843 (3d Cir.1977) (refusing to draw an adverse inference where destruction of a diary could have been unrelated to the lawsuit), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1022 , 98 S.Ct. 749 , 54 L.Ed.2d 770 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Simon
(2×)
See, e.g., Saxbe v. Washington Post Co., 417 U.S. 843, 850 , 94 S.Ct. 2811, 2815 , 41 L.Ed.2d 514 (1974) (“The proposition ‘that the Constitution imposes upon government the affirmative duty to make available to journalists sources of information not available to members of the public generally ... finds no support in the words of the Constitution or in any decision of the Court.’ ”) (quoting Pell v. Procunier, 417 U.S. at 834-35, 94 S.Ct. at 2810 ); Zemel, 381 U.S. at 17 , 85 S.Ct. at 1281 (“The right to speak and publish does not carry with it the unrestrained right to gather infor…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Marcia E. Stearns v. Consolidated Management, Inc.
(2×)
See, e.g., Rogers v. Exxon Research & Engineering Co., 550 F.2d 834 (3d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1022 , 98 S.Ct. 749 , 54 L.Ed.2d 770 (1978) (recognizing equitable reasons for not enforcing deferral requirement); Rucker v. Great Scott Supermarkets, 528 F.2d 393 (6th Cir.1976) (“jurisdictional” requirement that plaintiff give 60 days notice of intent to file suit under ADEA may be waived when “special facts” are present); Ott v. Midland-Ross corporation, 523 F.2d 1367 (6th Cir.1975) (180-day filing requirement of ADEA is jurisdictional, but may be tolled).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Krodel v. Young
See, e.g., Rogers v. Exxon Research & Engineering Co., 550 F.2d 834, 842 (3d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1022 , 98 S.Ct. 749 , 54 L.Ed.2d 770 (1978); Brennan v. Ace Hardware Corp., 495 F.2d 368 , 374 n. 11 (8th Cir.1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Thomas J. Lipton, Inc.
See, e.g., Rogers v. Exxon Research & Engineering Co., 550 F.2d 834, 839 (3d Cir.1977) (legal relief sought and jury was allowed), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1022 , 98 S.Ct. 749 , 54 L.Ed.2d 770 (1978); Morelock v. NCR Corp., 546 F.2d 682, 688-89 (6th Cir.1976) (equitable relief sought and no jury granted), vacated and remanded, 435 U.S. 911 , 98 S.Ct. 1463 , 55 L.Ed.2d 503 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Tosco Corp. v. Eubanks
See, e. g., Central South Carolina Chapter v. Martin, 556 F.2d 707 (4th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1022 , 98 S.Ct. 749 , 54 L.Ed.2d 771 (1978); United States v. Sherman, 581 F.2d 1358 (9th Cir. 1978); CBS Inc. v. Young, 522 F.2d 234 (6th Cir. 1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Alice Nakshian v. W. Graham Claytor, in His Official Capacity as Secretary of the Navy
Compare Rogers v. Exxon Research & Eng’r Co., 550 F.2d 834 (3d Cir. 1977) (right to jury trial), cert denied, 434 U.S. 1022 , 98 S.Ct. 749 , 54 L.Ed.2d 770 (1978), and Pons v. Lorillard, 549 F.2d 950 (4th Cir. 1977) (same), aff’d, 434 U.S. 575 , 98 S.Ct. 866 , 55 L.Ed.2d 40 (1978), with Morelock v. NCR Corp., 546 F.2d 682 (6th Cir. 1976) (no right to jury trial), vacated and remanded, 435 U.S. 911 , 98 S.Ct. 1463 , 55 L.Ed.2d 503 (1978). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc. v. Jerome
Compare Central South Carolina Chapter v. Martin, 556 F.2d 706 (4th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1022 , 98 S.Ct. 749 , 54 L.Ed.2d 771 (1978) (participants may be ordered not to discuss proceedings in order to protect defendant’s right to fair trial), and Gannett Co. v. DePasquale, 43 N.Y.2d 370 , 401 N.Y.S.2d 756 , 372 N.E.2d 544 (N.Y. filed December 19, 1977), cert. granted,----U.S. -------, - S.Ct. ----, — L.Ed.2d--------, (1978) (suppression hearing may be closed to protect right of defendant to an impartial jury), with Chase v. Robson, 435 F.2d 1059 (7th Cir. 1970) (court may not…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Central South Carolina Chapter, Society of Professional Journalists, Sigma Delta Chi
v.
Martin, U. S. District Judge
v.
Martin, U. S. District Judge
No. 77-263.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 9, 1978.
Certiorari, White.
Published
C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
Mr. Justice White and Mr. Justice Powell would grant certiorari.