green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.0 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Ramos v. Seidl
doubt should not be cast upon his credibility as a penalty for exercising his prerogative to make no statement to the arresting officer
discussed
Cited "see"
Larouche v. Webster
“From such a statement, the factfinder may infer that an event that normally would be reflected in the public record did not occur.” Pinto-Mejia, 720 F.2d at 257 (emphasis added); see United States v. Robinson, 544 F.2d 110, 114 (2d Cir.) (“The absence of a record of an event which would ordinarily be recorded gives rise to a legitimate negative inference that the event did not occur.”), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1050 , 98 S.Ct. 901 , 54 L.Ed.2d 803 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Vincent C. Wiley v. United States of America Citizens Federal Mortgage Corporation State of Ohio Franklin County Treasurer and Houng Thai
See United States v. Robinson, 544 F.2d 110, 114 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1050 , 98 S.Ct. 901 , 54 L.Ed.2d 803 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. David McHenry United States of America v. John Gulde
See United States v. Garcia-Rodriguez, 558 F.2d 956, 965-66 (9th Cir.1977) (instructions must "fairly and adequately" explain charges), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1050 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jay Vee Wanless, A/K/A William Earl Wanless, Douglass Scott Tompkins, Linda Aune, and Michael Eugene Beck
(2×)
See United States v. Garcia-Rodriguez, 558 F.2d 956, 965 (9th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1050 , 98 S.Ct. 900 , 54 L.Ed.2d 802 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Post
See United States v. Impson (C.A. 5, 1977), 562 F. 2d 970, 971 , certiorari denied (1978), 434 U.S. 1050 ; United States, ex rel.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. David Joe Massey
See United States v. Impson, 531 F.2d 274, 277 (5th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1050 , 98 S.Ct. 900 , 54 L.Ed.2d 803 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Sandor Regner
(2×)
See United States v. Robinson, 544 F.2d 110, 114-15 (2d Cir. 1976), cert, denied, 434 U.S. 1050 , 98 S.Ct. 901 , 54 L.Ed.2d 803 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Robinson v. People
United States v. Calhoun, 544 F.2d 291 (6th Cir.1976); see also United States v. Robinson, 544 F.2d 110 , 113 n. 4 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1050 , 98 S.Ct. 901 , 54 L.Ed.2d 803 (1978) (stating that “it is not improper to exclude the testimony of lay witnesses asked to render an opinion whether the individual in a bank photograph is the defendant,” although, under the facts of that case, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals allowed such lay opinion testimony). 2 However, even this minority of jurisdictions has not adopted a per se rule excluding such lay opinion testimony.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Gilmore v. Henderson
Compare United States v. Robinson, 544 F.2d 110, 115-16 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1050 , 98 S.Ct. 901 , 54 L.Ed.2d 803 (1978).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Smiley
v.
California
v.
California
No. 77-5850.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 23, 1978.
Published
Citer courts: D. New Jersey (1)
Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.