green
Positive treatment
3.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "see"
John Albert Strand v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
See Wilson v. Commissioner, cert. denied, 439 U.S. 832 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cabral v. Sullivan
See United States v. Rauch, 574 F.2d 706, 707 (2d Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 832 , 99 S.Ct. 110 , 58 L.Ed.2d 126 cert. denied, 439 U.S. 893 , 99 S.Ct. 250 , 58 L.Ed.2d 238 (1978); Manual for Complex Litigation Second 142 n. 45 (1986); W.
cited
Cited "see"
National Labor Relations Board v. Best Products Co., Inc.
See NLRB v. Heath Tec Division/San Francisco, 566 F.2d 1367, 1372 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 832 , 99 S.Ct. 110 , 58 L.Ed.2d 127 (1978). 6 *909 IV.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Roy L. Williams, Thomas F. O'malley, Andrew G. Massa, Joseph Lombardo
See United States v. Williams, 580 F.2d 578 , 583 n. 21 (D.C.Cir.) (Title III case), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 832 , 99 S.Ct. 112 , 58 L.Ed.2d 127 (1978); United States v. Wright, 524 F.2d 1100, 1102 (2d Cir.1975) (same); see also United States v. Chase, 692 F.2d 69, 70 (9th Cir.1982) (Fourth Amendment standing law); United States v. Hansen, 652 F.2d 1374, 1386-87 (10th Cir.1981) (same).
discussed
Cited "see"
Southway Theatres, Inc. v. Georgia Theatre Company
See Dillon Materials Handling, Inc. v. Albion Industries Division of King-Seeley Thomas Co., 567 F.2d 1299 , 1301-02 & n.8 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 832 , 99 S.Ct. 111 , 58 L.Ed.2d 127 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Perez
See generally U. S. v. Beardslee, 562 F.2d 1016 (6th Cir. 1977) cert. denied 439 U.S. 832 , 99 S.Ct. 113 , 58 L.Ed.2d 128 ; U. S. v. Porter, 581 F.2d 698 (8th Cir. 1978); Black v. O’Haver, 567 F.2d 361 (10th Cir. 1977) cert. denied, 435 U.S. 969 , 98 S.Ct. 1609 , 56 L.Ed.2d 61 ; Nation Wide Inc. v. Scullin, 256 F.Supp. 929 (D.N.J.1966), affirmed 377 F.2d 554 (3rd Cir. 1967).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Felt
See United States v. Williams, 580 F.2d 578, 586 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 832 , 99 S.Ct. 112 , 58 L.Ed.2d 127 (1978) (in “taint” proceeding under Alderman effect of disclosure on national security minimized because limited to “ ‘defendant’s own conversations’ ” overheard on “ ‘own premises’ ”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Klein
See, e.g., United States v. Williams, 580 F2d 578, 583 (DC Cir), cert den, 439 US 832 (1978) (an accused may only seek suppression where electronic eavesdropping was directed at him, the Government intercepted his conversations, or the wiretapped communications occurred at least partly on his premises); United States v. King, 478 F2d 494, 506 (9th Cir), cert den, 414 US 846 (1973) (a defendant may move to suppress “only if his privacy was actually invaded; that is, if he was a participant in an intercepted conversation, or if such conversation occurred on his premise”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Milton Eugene Robins
Compare United States v. Williams, 580 F.2d 578 (D.C.Cir.) (to facilitate an accused's effort to demonstrate that evidence employable against him is contaminated by illegal surveillance previously conducted, the government, upon request, must affirm or deny the occurrence of the alleged unlawful act), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 832 , 99 S.Ct. 112 , 58 L.Ed.2d 127 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Robins
Compare United States v. Williams, 580 F.2d 578 - (D.C.Cir.) (to facilitate an accused’s effort to demonstrate that evidence employable against him is contaminated by illegal surveillance previously conducted, the government, upon request, must affirm or deny the occurrence of the alleged unlawful act), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 832 , 99 S.Ct. 112 , 58 L.Ed.2d 127 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Lilla
United States v. DiMuro, 540 F.2d 503, 510-11 (1st Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1038 , 97 S.Ct. 733 , 50 L.Ed.2d 749 (1977); United States v. Feldman, 535 F.2d 1175, 1178-79 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 940 , 97 S.Ct. 354 , 50 L.Ed.2d 309 (1976); United States v. Vento, 533 F.2d 838, 849-50 (3d Cir.1976); United States v. Kalustian, 529 F.2d 585, 589-90 (9th Cir.1975); see also United States v. Williams, 188 U.S.App.D.C. 315 , 580 F.2d 578, 589 , cert. denied, 439 U.S. 832 , 99 S.Ct. 112 , 58 L.Ed.2d 127 (1978) (affiant's conclusion as to the need for wiretap upheld when read in con…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Lilla
United States v. DiMuro, 540 F.2d 503, 510-11 (1st Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1038 , 97 S.Ct. 733 , 50 L.Ed.2d 749 (1977); United States v. Feldman, 535 F.2d 1175, 1178-79 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 940 , 97 S.Ct. 354 , 50 L.Ed.2d 309 (1976); United States v. Vento, 533 F.2d 838, 849-50 (3d Cir.1976); United States v. Kalustian, 529 F.2d 585, 589-90 (9th Cir.1975); see also United States v. Williams, 188 U.S.App.D.C. 315 , 580 F.2d 578, 589 , cert. denied, 439 U.S. 832 , 99 S.Ct. 112 , 58 L.Ed.2d 127 (1978) (affiant’s conclusion as to the need for wiretap upheld when read in c…
Lacey
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 77-1751.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 2, 1978.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.