green
Positive treatment
4.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Am. Humanist Ass'n v. Perry
See Bolding v. Holshouser , 575 F.2d 461 , 466 (4th Cir.), cert. denied , 439 U.S. 837 , 99 S.Ct. 121 , 58 L.Ed.2d 133 (1978) ; Mitchum v. Foster , 407 U.S. 225 , 242, 92 S.Ct. 2151 , 32 L.Ed.2d 705 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
Waters v. Bass
See Bolding v. Holshouser, 575 F.2d 461, 465 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 837 , 99 S.Ct. 121 , 58 L.Ed.2d 133 , (1978) (holding that failure to provide adequate sanitary food service facilities establishes a cognizable claim). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Bohannon v. Durham County Hospital Corp.
Rule 12(b)(6) must be read consistently with the liberal pleading standards set forth in Rule 8, which requires only “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a)(2); see Bolding v. Holshouser, 575 F.2d 461, 464 (4th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 837 , 99 S.Ct. 121 , 58 L.Ed.2d 133 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Islam v. Jackson
(2×)
Deprivations Not Sufficiently Serious The Fourth Circuit recognizes the well-established principle that “inmates must be provided nutritionally adequate food, ‘prepared and served under conditions which do not present an immediate danger to the health and well being of the inmates who consume it.’ ” Shrader v. White, 761 F.2d 975, 986 (4th Cir.1985) (citations omitted); see Bolding v. Holshouser, 575 F.2d 461, 465 (4th Cir.) (prisoner’s allegation of. failure to provide adequate sanitary food service facilities states a cognizable claim), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 837 , 99 S.Ct. 121 , 5…
discussed
Cited "see"
Wayne Dillard Carver v. Knox County, Tennessee, Joe Fowler, Sheriff, Defendants/cross-Plaintiffs v. Ned Ray McWherter Defendants/cross-Defendants/appellants
See Bolding v. Holshouser, 575 F.2d 461, 466-67 (4th Cir.) (after noting that a prisoner's action against state officials residing in different districts within the state may be brought in any of the districts, the court added that upon a proper showing the district court might conclude to transfer such a case to a different district from the one in which it was filed), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 837 , 99 S.Ct. 121 , 58 L.Ed.2d 133 (1978). 22 We disagree also with the assertion that the class action plaintiffs in the present case are not members of the Grubbs class.
discussed
Cited "see"
Carver v. Knox County
See Bolding v. Holshouser, 575 F.2d 461, 466-67 (4th Cir.) (after noting that a prisoner’s action against state officials residing in different districts within the state may be brought in any of the districts, the court added that upon a proper showing the district court might conclude to transfer such a case to a different district from the one in which it was filed), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 837 , 99 S.Ct. 121 , 58 L.Ed.2d 133 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Providence and Worcester Railroad Company v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Penn Central Corporation, Intervenors
See Bangor & Aroostook Railroad v. ICC (“BAR”), 574 F.2d 1096 , 1103-04 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 837 , 99 S.Ct. 121 , 58 L.Ed.2d 133 (1978); Southern Pacific Railway v. United States, 277 F.Supp. 671, 685 (D.Neb.1967) (three-judge court), aff’d mem., 390 U.S. 744 , 88 S.Ct. 1442 , 20 L.Ed.2d 275 (1968).
cited
Cited "see"
Bennett v. Reed
See Bolding v. Holshouser, 575 *88 F.2d 461 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 837 , 99 S.Ct. 121 , 58 L.Ed.2d 133 (1978); Mitchum v. Foster, 407 U.S. 225 , 92 S.Ct. 2151 , 32 L.Ed.2d 705 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
Hassan A. Muhammad, A/K/A Irving L. Madden v. Charles J. Rowe
See Bolding v. Holshouser, 575 F.2d 461, 465 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 837 , 99 S.Ct. 121 , 58 L.Ed.2d 133 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Preval v. Reno
Compare Bolding v. Holshouser, 575 F.2d 461 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 837 , 99 S.Ct. 121 , 58 L.Ed.2d 133 (1978) (holding that broad pro se pleading with potentially cognizable claim should not be dismissed immediately). 5 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dawson v. Kendrick
When a prison regulation or practice offends a fundamental constitutional guarantee, federal courts will discharge their duty to protect constitutional rights. 416 U.S. at 405-06 , 94 S.Ct. at 1807-08 ; see also Bolding v. Holshouser, 575 F.2d 461, 466 (4th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 837 , 99 S.Ct. 121 , 58 L.Ed.2d 133 (1978).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Holshouser
v.
Bolding
v.
Bolding
No. 77-1843.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 2, 1978.
Published
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.