green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
6.9 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1983 ·
…the verdict of a jury must be sustained if there is substantial evidence taking the view most favorable to the government to support it
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 21 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Bert R. Slocum and Louise v. Slocum, United States of America v. Bert R. Slocum, Louise v. Slocum, Ray B. Slocum, Doris Fuller, Francille Miller
the verdict of a jury must be sustained if there is substantial evidence taking the view most favorable to the government to support it
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Slocum
the verdict of a jury must be sustained if there is substantial evidence taking the view most favorable to the government to support it
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Charles G. Stephens, Sr.
See United States v. Malatesta, 590 F.2d 1379, 1381 (5th Cir.) (participation in a criminal conspiracy may be inferred from a development and a collocation of circumstances) (citation omitted), cert. denied sub. nom., 444 U.S. 846 , 100 S.Ct. 91 , 100 S.Ct. 91 , 62 L.Ed.2d 59 (1979), cert. denied sub. nom., 440 U.S. 962 , 99 S.Ct. 1508 , 59 L.Ed.2d 777 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Christopher Barry Greer, Daniel Alvis Wood, Sean Christian Tarrant, Michael Lewis Lawrence, and Jon Lance Jordan
“The verdict of a jury must be sustained if there is substantial evidence, taking the view most favorable to the Government, to support it.” Glasser v. United States, 315 U.S. 60, 80 , 62 S.Ct. 457, 469 , 86 L.Ed. 680 (1942) (citations omitted); see United States v. Malatesta, 590 F.2d 1379, 1382 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 962 , 99 S.Ct. 1508 , 59 L.Ed.2d 777 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Charles Ivy
See United States v. Malatesta, 583 F.2d 748, 759 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 962 , 99 S.Ct. 1508 , 59 L.Ed.2d 777 [1979].
discussed
Cited "see"
Lochhead v. Alacano
See United States v. Malatesta, 590 F.2d 1379, 1381 (5th Cir.) (criminal conspiracy conviction requirements), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 962 , 99 S.Ct. 1508 , 59 L.Ed.2d 777 , 444 U.S. 846 , 100 S.Ct. 91 , 62 L.Ed.2d 59 (1979) (quoting Ingram v. United States, 360 U.S. 672, 678 , 79 S.Ct. 1314, 1319 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1503 (1975)); United States v. Elliott, 571 F.2d at 902-03 (general federal conspiracy law analogized to RICO conspiracy provisions).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Sabino De Leon
See United States v. Malatesta, 590 F.2d 1379 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 962 , 99 S.Ct. 1508 , 59 L.Ed.2d 777 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lonnie Dwain Clark, A/K/A Chick Clark
See United States v. Malatesta, 583 F.2d 748, 759 (5th Cir.1978), modified in another respect, 590 F.2d 1379 (5th Cir.1979) (en banc), cert, denied, 440 U.S. 962 , 99 S.Ct. 1508 , 59 L.Ed.2d 777 , 444 U.S. 846 , 100 S.Ct. 91 , 62 L.Ed.2d 59 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. John Bagnariol, United States of America v. Gordon L. Walgren, United States of America v. Patrick Gallagher
See generally United States v. Malatesta, 583 F.2d 748, 756 (5th Cir. 1978), aff’d on rehearing en banc, 590 F.2d 1379 (5th Cir.) (limited to reevaluation of unrelated issue), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 962 , 99 S.Ct. 1508 , 59 L.Ed.2d 777 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Joseph
Accord, United States v. Malatesta, 583 F.2d 748, 758 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 962 , 99 S.Ct. 1508 , 59 L.Ed.2d 777 (1979) ; United States v. Salinas, 564 F.2d 688, 692-93 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 951 , 98 S.Ct. 1577 , 55 L.Ed.2d 800 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Tom Welch, Charles Cashell, William L. Satterwhite and James M. Cochran
(2×)
See United States v. Malatesta, 590 F.2d 1379, 1381 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 962 , 99 S.Ct. 1508 , 59 L.Ed.2d 777 (1979) & 444 U.S. 846 , 100 S.Ct. 91 , 62 L.Ed.2d 59 (1979). “[P]articipation in a criminal conspiracy need not be proved by direct evidence; a common purpose and plan may be inferred from a ‘development and a collocation of circumstances.’ ” Id. (quoting Glasser v. United States, 315 U.S. 60 , 62 S.Ct. 457, 469 , 86 L.Ed. 680 (1942)).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Grand Jury Investigation.
See United States v. Malatesta, 583 F.2d 748, 753 (5th Cir. 1978), Modified on other grounds, 590 F.2d 1379 (en banc), Cert. denied, 440 U.S. 962 , 99 S.Ct. 1508 , 59 L.Ed.2d 777 (1979); United States v. Dunham Concrete Products, Inc., 475 F.2d 1241 (5th Cir.), Cert. denied, 414 U.S. 832 , 94 S.Ct. 65 , 38 L.Ed.2d 66 (1973); In re Grand Jury Subpoena Served upon Pedro Archuleta, 432 F.Supp. at 599 . 33 Fifth, the court must weigh any evidence presented by the government to rebut the assumed truthfulness of reports which otherwise make a prima facie case of misconduct.
discussed
Cited "see"
Lance v. United States Department of Justice
See United States v. Malatesta, 583 F.2d 748, 753 (5th Cir. 1978), modified on other grounds, 590 F.2d 1379 (en banc), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 962 , 99 S.Ct. 1508 , 59 L.Ed.2d 777 (1979); United States v. Dunham Concrete Products, Inc., 475 F.2d 1241 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 832 , 94 S.Ct. 65 , 38 L.Ed.2d 66 (1973); In re Grand Jury Subpoena Served upon Pedro Archuleta, 432 F.Supp. at 599 .
discussed
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CHARLES G. STEPHENS, SR
See United States v. Malatesta, 590 F.2d 1379, 1381 (5th Cir.) (participation in a criminal conspiracy may be inferred from a development and a collocation of circumstances) (citation omitted), cert. denied sub. nom., 444 U.S. 846 , 100 S. Ct. 91 (1979), cert. denied sub. nom., 440 U.S. 962 , 99 S. Ct. 1508 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Edward A. Thomas
See, e.g., United States v. Licavoli, 725 F.2d 1040, 1046-47 (6th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1252 , 104 S.Ct. 3535 , 82 L.Ed.2d 840 (1984) (citing United States v. Malatesta, 583 F.2d 748, 758 (5th Cir.1978), ce rt. denied, 440 U.S. 962 , 99 S.Ct. 1508 , 59 L.Ed.2d 777 (1979)); United States v. Davis, 576 F.2d 1065, 1066-67 (3d Cir.1978), ce rt. denied, 439 U.S. 836 , 99 S.Ct. 119 , 58 L.Ed.2d 132 (1978); United States v. Forsythe, 560 F.2d 1127, 1134 (3d Cir.1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Scarfo
See also United States v. Malatesta, 583 F.2d 748, 759 (5th Cir.1978) (prosecutor calling defendant a “con man” and “hoodlum” supported by the evidence), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 962 , 99 S.Ct. 1508 , 59 L.Ed.2d 777 (1979); United States v. Williams, 726 F.2d 661, 664 (10th Cir.) (“drug smuggler”), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1245 , 104 S.Ct. 3523 , 82 L.Ed.2d 830 (1984); United States v. Ong, 541 F.2d 331 *1328 (2d Cir.1976) (“Chinatown’s chief corrupter for 20 years”), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 934 , 97 S.Ct. 1559 , 51 L.Ed.2d 780 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Andrew Meeks v. Donald A. Cabana, Superintendent, Mississippi Dept. Of Corrections
Norris, 588 F.2d at 135-37 ; see also Huff v. Wainwright, 583 F.2d 744, 745 (5th Cir.1978), *1323 cert. denied, 440 U.S. 963 , 99 S.Ct. 1508 , 59 L.Ed.2d 777 (1979); Loter v. Estelle, 546 F.2d 151, 152-53 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 846 , 98 S.Ct. 150 , 54 L.Ed.2d 112 (1977).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Lopez v. Richards
See, e.g., United States v. Malatesta, 583 F.2d 748, 754 (5th Cir.1978), aff’d on rehearing en banc, 590 F.2d 1379 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 962 , 99 S.Ct. 1508 , 59 L.Ed.2d 777 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Shane
See, e.g., United States v. Malatesta, 583 F.2d 748, 752-754 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 962 , 99 S.Ct. 1508 , 59 L.Ed.2d 777 (1979); United States v. Lawson, 502 F.Supp. 158, 166-167 (D.Md.1980); see also In re Grand Jury Proceedings, 658 F.2d 782, 783 (10th Cir.1981) (adverting to problem).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Joe Walker and Iverson Broadway, A/K/A Skeet
See also United States v. Malatesta, 590 F.2d 1379 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 962 , 99 S.Ct. 1508 , 59 L.Ed.2d 777 (1979); United States v. Harbin, 601 F.2d 773 (5th Cir. 1979). 4 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Huff
v.
Wainwright, Secretary, Department of Offender Rehabilitation of Florida
v.
Wainwright, Secretary, Department of Offender Rehabilitation of Florida
No. 78-5835.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 19, 1979.
Published
Citer courts: Eleventh Circuit (2)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.