green
Positive treatment
7.2 score
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Allen J.
See United States v. Haro, 573 F.2d 661, 667 (10th Cm.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 851 , 99 S.Ct. 156 , 58 L.Ed.2d 155 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Asher, Robert B.
(2×)
Although the district court's factual finding to this effect was clearly erroneous, the Court agrees with the district court's implicit legal conclusion (i.e., that Asher's cross-examination was the proper focus of the factual inquiry) 9 For instance, Rule 801(d)(2), which like Rule 801(d)(1) is an exception to the general rule that hearsay evidence is inadmissible to show the truth of the matter asserted, is triggered when the admission of a party-opponent "is offered against a party...." Fed.R.Evid. 801(d)(2) (emphasis added) 10 In Provenzano, for example, we noted that "[s]ome evidence of […
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Evans
(2×)
See United States v. Snead, 447 F.Supp. 1321 (E.D.Pa.), affirmed 577 F.2d 730 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied 436 U.S. 930 , 98 S.Ct. 2829 , 56 L.Ed.2d 775 and 439 U.S. 851 , 99 S.Ct. 156 , 58 L.Ed.2d 154 (1978) (testimony clearly relevant and probative with respect to one defendant was properly admitted over co-defendant’s claim of prejudice).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Nolen
(2×)
See United States v. Snead, 447 F.Supp. 1321 (E.D.Pa.), affirmed 577 F.2d 730 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied 436 U.S. 930 , 98 S.Ct. 2829 , 56 L.Ed.2d 775 and 439 U.S. 851 , 99 S.Ct. 156 , 58 L.Ed.2d 154 (1978) (testimony clearly relevant and probative with respect to one defendant was properly admitted over co-defendant's claim of prejudice).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jose L. M. Pardo, United States of America v. Cecil P. Tate, United States of America v. Sixto R. Mendoza, United States of America v. Paul A. Goodwin
See United States v. Haro, 573 F.2d 661 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 851 , 99 S.Ct. 156 , 58 L.Ed.2d 155 (1978); United States v. Nogueira, 585 F.2d 23 (1st Cir. 1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Pardo
See United States v. Haro, 573 F.2d 661 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 851 , 99 S.Ct. 156 , 58 L.Ed.2d 155 (1978); United States v. Nogueira, 585 F.2d 23 (1st Cir. 1978).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Dickey
See, e.g., United States v. Haro, 573 F.2d 661, 667 (10th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 851 , 99 S.Ct. 156 , 58 L.Ed.2d 155 (1978); Foster v. United States, 282 F.2d 222, 224 (10th Cir.1960).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Dickey
See, e.g., United States v. Haro, 573 F.2d 661, 667 (10th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 851 , 99 S.Ct. 156 , 58 L.Ed.2d 155 (1978); Foster v. United States, 282 F.2d 222, 224 (10th Cir.1960).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Brown
See also United States v. Haro, 573 F.2d 661, 666-68 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 851 , 99 S.Ct. 156 , 58 L.Ed.2d 155 (1978) and United States v. Brumbaugh, 471 F.2d 1128, 1129 (6th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 412 U.S. 918 , 93 S.Ct. 2732 , 37 L.Ed.2d 144 (1973); United States v. Matanky, 482 F.2d 1319, 1324 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1039 , 94 S.Ct. 539 , 38 L.Ed.2d 329 (1973); United States v. Mucherino, 311 F.2d 172, 173-75 (4th Cir. 1962).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Stokes
v.
Fair, Correctional Superintendent
v.
Fair, Correctional Superintendent
No. 77-6870.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 2, 1978.
Published
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.