green
Positive treatment
4.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Brown v. Kelly
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Marcera, 442 U.S. at 915 , 99 S.Ct. 2833 (remanding the case for further consideration in light of recent precedent regarding inmate confinement facilities).
cited
Cited "see"
Krueger v. New York Telephone Co.
See Marcera v. Chinlund, 595 F.2d 1231, 1240 (2d Cir.), vacated on other grounds, 442 U.S. 915 , 99 S.Ct. 2833 , 61 L.Ed.2d 281 (1979); see Enterprise Wall Paper Mfg.
cited
Cited "see"
Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Town of Hyde Park
See Marcera v. Chinlund, 595 F.2d 1231, 1237 (2d Cir.1979), vacated on other grounds, 442 U.S. 915 , 99 S.Ct. 2833 , 61 L.Ed.2d 281 (1979). 1.
cited
Cited "see"
Consolidated Rail Corporation v. Town Of Hyde Park
See Marcera v. Chinlund, 595 F.2d 1231, 1237 (2d Cir.1979), vacated on other grounds, 442 U.S. 915 , 99 S.Ct. 2833 , 61 L.Ed.2d 281 (1979). 82 1.
discussed
Cited "see"
Henson v. East Lincoln Township
See Marcera v. Chinlund, 595 F.2d 1231 (2d Cir.), vacated on other grounds sub nom Lombard v. Marcera, 442 U.S. 915 , 99 S.Ct. 2833 , 61 L.Ed.2d 281 (1979); Leist v. Shawano Co., 91 F.R.D. 64 (E.D.Wisc.1981); Hoyson v. Schilling, 418 F.Supp. 1223 (N.D.Ind.1976); Rodriguez v. Township of DeKalb, No. 80 C 1509 (N.D.Ill.
cited
Cited "see"
Arrango v. Ward
See Marcera v. Chinlund, 595 F.2d 1231, 1239 (2d Cir.), vacated on other grounds, 442 U.S. 915 , 99 S.Ct. 2833 , 61 L.Ed.2d 281 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
In re Arthur Treacher's Franchisee Litigation
See Marcera v. Chinlund, 595 F.2d 1231, 1239 (2d Cir.), vacated on other grounds, 442 U.S. 915 , 99 S.Ct. 2833 , 61 L.Ed.2d 281 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Stephen H. Marks v. San Francisco Real Estate Board
(2×)
See Marcera v. Chinlund, 595 F.2d 1231 , 1236 n. 8 (2d Cir.), vacated and remanded on other grnds., 442 U.S. 915 , 99 S.Ct. 2833 , 61 L.Ed.2d 281 (1979); Merrill-National Lab., Inc. v. Zenith Lab., Inc., 579 F.2d 786 , 791 (3d Cir. 1978); Yamamoto v. Omiya, 564 F.2d 1319 , 1325 n. 11 (9th Cir. 1977); Genosick v. Richmond Unified School Dist., 479 F.2d 482 (9th Cir. 1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Meachem v. Wing
See, e.g., Marcera v. Chinlund, 595 F.2d 1231, 1237 (2d Cir.1979) (“It is well established that civil rights actions are the paradigmatic 23(b)(2) class suits, for they seek classwide structural relief that would clearly redound equally to the benefit of each class member."), vacated on other grounds, Lombard v. Marcera, 442 U.S. 915 , 99 S.Ct. 2833 , 61 L.Ed.2d 281 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Luyando v. Bowen
See also, Marcera v. Chinlund, 595 F.2d 1231 (2d Cir.), vacated on other grounds, 442 U.S. 915 , 99 S.Ct. 2833 , 61 L.Ed.2d 281 (1979) (defendant class of 42 public officials certified); Kendall v. True, 391 F.Supp. 413 (W.D.Ky.1975) (defendant class of 16 judges certified).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Charles E. Wagner, for Himself and Others Similarly Situated v. Reese H. Taylor, Jr., Chairman, Interstate Commerce Commission
(2×)
Police Benevolent Ass'n v. Port Auth., 698 F.2d 150, 152 (2d Cir.1983); see also Marcera v. Chinlund, 595 F.2d 1231 , 1236 n. 8 (2d Cir.), vacated on other grounds, 442 U.S. 915 , 99 S.Ct. 2833 , 61 L.Ed.2d 281 (1979); Sanders v. Levy, 558 F.2d 636, 643 (2d Cir.1976), adhered to on this point en banc, 558 F.2d 646, 647-648 (2d Cir.1977), rev’d on other grounds sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Follette v. Vitanza
Most often, “juridical links” are found in cases where all members of the proposed class “are officials of a single state and are charged with enforcing or uniformly acting in accordance with a state statute, or common rule or practice of state-wide application, which is alleged to be unconstitutional.” Mudd v. Busse, 68 F.R.D. 522, 528 (N.D.Ill.1975); see also Marcera v. Chinlund, 595 F.2d 1231, 1238-39 (2d Cir.), vacated on other grounds, 442 U.S. 915 , 99 S.Ct. 2833 , 61 L.Ed.2d 281 (1979); DeAllaume, 110 F.R.D. at 303-304 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Harris v. Graddick
However, “[i]n a Rule 23(b)(2) class action, mechanics of the notice process are left to the discretion of the district court subject only to the broad ‘reasonableness’ standard imposed by due process.” Fowler v. Birmingham News Co., 608 F.2d 1055, 1058 (5th Cir.1979); see also Marcera v. Chinlund, 595 F.2d 1231 , 1240 n. 13 (2d Cir.), vacated on other grounds, 442 U.S. 915 , 99 S.Ct. 2833 , 61 L.Ed.2d 281 (1979) (same for notice to defendant class).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Akerman v. Oryx Communications, Inc.
See, e.g., Marcera v. Chinlund, 595 F.2d 1231 , 1238-39 (2d Cir.1979), vacated on other grounds, 442 U.S. 915 , 99 S.Ct. 2833 , 61 L.Ed.2d 281 (1979); Samuel v. University of Pittsburg, 56 F.R.D. 435, 439 (W.D.Pa. 1972); see also Mudd v. Busse, 68 F.R.D. at 528 (collecting cases).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lake v. Speziale
See also Marcera v. Chinlund, 595 F.2d 1231 , 1238 & n. 10 (2d Cir.) (describing Rule 23(b)(2) as an appropriate vehicle for injunctive relief against a defendant class of local public officials), vacated on other grds., 442 U.S. 915 , 99 S.Ct. 2833 , 61 L.Ed.2d 281 (1979). 9 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Williams
v.
Zbaraz
v.
Zbaraz
No. A-958.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 4, 1979.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
D. C. N. D. Ill. Application for stay, addressed to Mr. Justice Rehnquist and referred to the Court, denied.