green
Positive treatment
9.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
State v. Phelps
(2×)
But see United States v. James, 590 F.2d 575, 581 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 917 , 99 S.Ct. 2836 , 61 L.Ed.2d 283 (1979); United States v. Cambindo Valencia, 609 F. 2d 603, 631 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 940 , 100 S.Ct. 2163 , 64 L.Ed.2d 795 (1980); United States v. Bell, 573 F.2d 1040, 1044 (8th Cir.1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Safavian
See United States v. Slade, 627 F.2d 293, 306-07 (D.C.Cir.1980) (citing United States v. James, 590 F.2d 575, 580-81 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 917 , 99 S.Ct. 2836 , 61 L.Ed.2d 283 (1979)).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Hernandez-Sendejas
See United States v. James, 590 F.2d 575 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 917 , 99 S.Ct. 2836 , 61 L.Ed.2d 283 (1979). 5 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Blackwell
Omnibus Brief at 17; see United States v. James, 576 F.2d 1121, 1127-32 (5th Cir.1978), modified, 590 F.2d 575 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 917 , 99 S.Ct. 2836 , 61 L.Ed.2d 283 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Hernandez-Miranda
See United States v. James, 590 F.2d 575 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 917 , 99 S.Ct. 2836 , 61 L.Ed.2d 283 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Isidro Nieto
See United States v. James, 590 F.2d 575, 582 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 917 , 99 S.Ct. 2836 , 61 L.Ed.2d 283 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Johnson
See United States v. James, 590 F.2d 575 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 917 , 99 S.Ct. 2836 , 61 L.Ed.2d 283 (1979). 11 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lang
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See United States v. James, 590 F.2d 575, 579 (5th Cir.) (stating that under Fed.R.Evid. 104, "the judge alone decides preliminary questions which relate to the competence of evidence, and the jury decides preliminary questions as to the conditional relevancy of the evidence”), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 917 , 99 S.Ct. 2836 , 61 L.Ed.2d 283 (1979). .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Garrido
See United States v. Wedelstedt, 589 F.2d 339, 348-49 (8th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 916 , 99 S.Ct. 2836 , 61 L.Ed.2d 283 (1979); see also Watts, 950 F.2d at 513 (holding evidence of preconspiracy drug activities involving one conspiracy member not prejudicial to other defendants; jury could compartmentalize information and preconspiracy evidence did not implicate other defendants except to convince the jury that first member was a drug dealer).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jose Hernandez Garrido, United States of America v. Ismael Villanueva-Hernandez, United States of America v. Jose Guerrero Valenzuela-Valles, United States of America v. Carlos Villanueva-Hernandez
See United States v. Wedelstedt, 589 F.2d 339, 348-49 (8th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 916 , 99 S.Ct. 2836 , 61 L.Ed.2d 283 (1979); see also Watts, 950 F.2d at 513 (holding evidence of preconspiracy drug activities involving one conspiracy member not prejudicial to other defendants; jury could compartmentalize information and preconspiracy evidence did not implicate other defendants except to convince the jury that first member was a drug dealer).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Kenneth Charles Fragoso
See United States v. James, 590 F.2d 575 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 917 , 99 S.Ct. 2836 , 61 L.Ed.2d 283 (1979). 4 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ernie Dimitric Caro, A/K/A Louis Caro
See United States v. James, 590 F.2d 575 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 917 , 99 S.Ct. 2836 , 61 L.Ed.2d 283 (1979). 3 .
cited
Cited "see"
Williams v. State
See United States v. James, 590 F.2d 575, 577 (5th Cir.1979), cert, denied, 442 U.S. 917 , 99 S.Ct. 2836 , 61 L.Ed.2d 283 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Mervyn Harold Cross A/K/A Eric Cross, and Robert Carter Lodge
See United States v. James, 590 F.2d 575 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 917 , 99 S.Ct. 2836 , 61 L.Ed.2d 283 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Taylor
United States v. Feola, supra, 651 F.Supp. at 1129 ; see United States v. James, 590 F.2d 575 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 917 , 99 S.Ct. 2836 , 61 L.Ed.2d 283 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Matos-Peralta
See United States v. James, 576 F.2d 1121, 1127-32 (5th Cir.1978), modified en banc, 590 F.2d 575 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 917 , 99 S.Ct. 2836 , 61 L.Ed.2d 283 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Thomas Donald Chestang, A/K/A Donnie, and Roy H. Chestang
See United States v. James, 590 F.2d 575, 580-81 (5th Cir.) (before statements are admitted against a defendant under Rule 801(d)(2)(E), there must be substantial evidence that a conspiracy existed, that the defendant and the declarant were members of the conspiracy, and that the statements were made in the course of and in furtherance of the conspiracy), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 917 , 99 S.Ct. 2836 , 61 L.Ed. 2d 283 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Enrique Almeida-Biffi
See United States v. James, 590 F.2d 575 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 917 , 99 S.Ct. 2836 , 61 L.Ed.2d 283 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Frederick Cody Magee, John Olin Buchanan, George Walter Hanson, Jr., and Robert Frank Norris
See United States v. James, 590 F.2d 575, 581 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 917 , 99 S.Ct. 2836 , 61 L.Ed.2d 283 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jorge Arroyo, A/K/A Sergio
See United States v. James, 590 F.2d 575 (5th Cir.1979) (en banc), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 917 , 99 S.Ct. 2836 , 61 L.Ed.2d 283 (1979); cf. Leal, 781 F.2d at 1111 (overturning a grant of a new trial, because the judge had erred in determining that an evidentiary error had occurred).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Zuluaga
See United States v. James, 576 F.2d 1121, 1127-32 (5th Cir.1978), modified in part, 590 F.2d 575 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 917 , 99 S.Ct. 2836 , 61 L.Ed.2d 283 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Santoro
James Hearing Defendants seek a pretrial hearing to determine the admissibility of any statements the government may offer into evidence as coconspirator hearsay under Fed. *185 R.Evid. 801(d)(2)(E). 31 This procedure, which is the preferred (but not required) practice in some circuits, see United States v. Ammar, 714 F.2d 238, 246 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 936 , 104 S.Ct. 344 , 78 L.Ed.2d 311 (1983); United States v. Montemayor, 703 F.2d 109, 116-17 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 822 , 104 S.Ct. 89 , 78 L.Ed.2d 97 (1983); see generally United States v. James, 576 F.2d 1121, 1127-3…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ianniello
See United States v. James, 576 F.2d 1121 (5th Cir.1978), modified en banc 590 F.2d 575 (5th Cir), cert.denied, 442 U.S. 917 , 99 S.Ct. 2836 , 61 L.Ed.2d 283 (1979). 100 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Persico
Evid. 801(d)(2)(E); see United States v. James, 576 F.2d 1121, 1127-32 (5th Cir. 1978), modified en banc, 590 F.2d 575 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 917 , 99 S.Ct. 2836 , 61 L.Ed.2d 283 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
John R. (Bob) Park D/B/A Action Real Estate, Cross v. El Paso Board of Realtors, and E. Dempsey Gunaca, Defendants-Cross
See United States v. James, 590 F.2d 575, 582-83 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 917 , 99 S.Ct. 2836 , 61 L.Ed.2d 283 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Acosta
See United States v. James, 590 F.2d 575 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 917 , 99 S.Ct. 2836 , 61 L.Ed.2d 283 (1979); Fed.R.Evid. 801(d)(2). 20 This Court has established procedures and standards for the admissibility of coconspirator statements congruent with the Federal Rules of Evidence.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Acosta
See United States v. James, 590 F.2d 575 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 917 , 99 S.Ct. 2836 , 61 L.Ed.2d 283 (1979); Fed.R.Evid. 801(d)(2).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Walter Lewis Clark, Iii, and George R. Newton, Moody Nichols, Defendants
See generally United States v. James, 590 F.2d 575, 581 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 917 , 99 S.Ct. 2836 , 61 L.Ed.2d 283 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States Ex Rel. Fuller v. Attorney General
See United States v. James, 590 F.2d 575, 581-82 (5th Cir.), cert. denied 442 U.S. 917 , 99 S.Ct. 2836 , 61 L.Ed.2d 283 (1979); People v. Goodman, 81 Ill.2d 278, 284 , 41 Ill.Dec. 793 , 408 N.E.2d 215 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Harold Haimowitz, Dan Scarborough, George L. Onett
See United States v. James, 590 F.2d 575, 578 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 917 , 99 S.Ct. 2836 , 61 L.Ed.2d 283 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Walker
See United States v. James, 590 F.2d 575 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 917 , 99 S.Ct. 2836 , 61 L.Ed.2d 283 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Walker
See United States v. James, 590 F.2d 575 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 917 , 99 S.Ct. 2836 , 61 L.Ed.2d 283 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ammar
(2×)
See United States v. James, 590 F.2d 575, 581 (5th Cir.) (in banc), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 917 , 99 S.Ct. 2836 , 61 L.Ed.2d 283 (1979). 20 Appellants contend that before allowing the introduction of any coconspirator statement the district court should have held a preliminary hearing at which the determination referred to above should have been made. 4 In United States v. James, 590 F.2d at 581-82 , on which they rely, the Fifth Circuit expressed its preference for requiring the government to establish the existence of the conspiracy and each defendant's participation in it by independent evid…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ammar
(2×)
See United States v. James, 590 F.2d 575, 581 (5th Cir.) (in banc), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 917 , 99 S.Ct. 2836 , 61 L.Ed.2d 283 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. John Charles Richardson
See United States v. James, 590 F.2d 575, 581-83 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 917 , 99 S.Ct. 2836 , 61 L.Ed.2d 283 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Saavedra v. State
See United States v. James, 590 F.2d 575 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 917 , 99 S.Ct. 2836 , 61 L.Ed.2d 283 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Blackston
Fed.R.Evid. 801(d)(2)(E); see U. S. v. James, 590 F.2d 575 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert, denied, 442 U.S. 917 , 99 S.Ct. 2836 , 61 L.Ed.2d 283 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Saimiento-Rozo
See United States v. James, 590 F.2d 575, 578 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 917 , 99 S.Ct. 2836 , 61 L.Ed.2d 283 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Saimiento-Rozo
See United States v. James, 590 F.2d 575, 578 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 917 , 99 S.Ct. 2836 , 61 L.Ed.2d 283 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Paul F. Newton & Co. v. Texas Commerce Bank
See United States v. James, 590 F.2d 575, 578 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 917 , 99 S.Ct. 2836 , 61 L.Ed.2d 283 (1979); Fed.R.
discussed
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,702, 7 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1080 Paul F. Newton & Company and Daniel O'connell, Receiver v. Texas Commerce Bank, Pressman, Frohlic & Frost
See United States v. James, 590 F.2d 575, 578 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 917 , 99 S.Ct. 2836 , 61 L.Ed.2d 283 (1979); Fed.R.Evid. 801(d)(2)(E). 38 Fed.R.Evid. 801(d)(2)(E) excludes from the definition of "hearsay" a statement that "is offered against a party and is ... a statement by a coconspirator of a party during the course and in furtherance of the conspiracy." In United States v. James, the en banc court interpreted Rule 801(d)(2)(E) to remove a statement made by a coconspirator from the application of the hearsay rule if the party seeking to introduce the statement has…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Auviene D'antignac, A/K/A Jack D'antignac, Patrick Glen Knight, Thomas Olden Thornton, Timothy David Cahill and Robert Wheeler Welch
See United States v. James, 590 F.2d 575 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 917, 99 S.Ct. 2836 , 61 L.Ed.2d 283 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Terry Wayne Hilton A/K/A Wayne Milton, William J. Baggett and Andrew N. Stover
See United States v. Whitmire, 595 F.2d 1303 , 1315 n. 36 (5th Cir. 1979), petition for cert. filed, 442 U.S. 917 , 99 S.Ct. 2836 , 61 L.Ed.2d 283 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Continental Group, Inc., in No. 78-2328. United States v. Chase Bag Company, in No. 78-2330. United States v. Cooper, James K., in No. 78-2331. United States v. Rue, Harrison B., in No. 78-2332
See United States v. James, 590 F.2d 575, 582 (5th Cir.) (en banc), Cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 99 S.Ct. 2836 , 61 L.Ed.2d 283 (1979); United States v. Macklin, 573 F.2d 1046 , 1049 n.3 (8th Cir.), Cert. denied, 439 U.S. 852 , 99 S.Ct. 160 , 58 L.Ed.2d 157 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Continental Group, Inc.
See United States v. James, 590 F.2d 575, 582 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, - U.S. - , 99 S.Ct. 2836 , 61 L.Ed.2d 283 (1979); United States v. Macklin, 573 F.2d 1046 , 1049 n.3 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 852 , 99 S.Ct. 160 , 58 L.Ed.2d 157 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jimmy Beaumont, Alvin Paul Brevell, Jr., A/K/A \Junior\"
See Bourjaily v. United States, 483 U.S. 171, 175-181 , 107 S.Ct. 2775, 2778-82 , 97 L.Ed.2d 144 (1987) (discussing admission of coconspirators’ statements under Rule 801(d)(2)(E)); see also United States v. James, 590 F.2d 575, 582-83 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 917 , 99 S.Ct. 2836 , 61 L.Ed.2d 283 (1979) (district court may conditionally admit coconspirators’ statements).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Van Hemelryck
See, e.g., United States v. Byrom, 910 F.2d 725, 734 (11th Cir.1990); see also United States v. James, 590 F.2d 575 (5th Cir.) (en banc), 2 cert. denied, 442 U.S. 917 , 99 S.Ct. 2836 , 61 L.Ed.2d 283 (1979), overruled in part by Bourjaily v. United States, 483 U.S. 171 , 107 S.Ct. 2775 , 97 L.Ed.2d 144 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. George Van Hemelryck, Golbert Bustamante, Tyrone Giraldo, United States of America v. George Van Hemelryck, Maria Alvardo, Lilacia Marina Bustamante
See, e.g., United States v. Byrom, 910 F.2d 725, 734 (11th Cir.1990); see also United States v. James, 590 F.2d 575 (5th Cir.) (en banc), 2 cert. denied, 442 U.S. 917 , 99 S.Ct. 2836 , 61 L.Ed.2d 283 (1979), overruled in part by Bourjaily v. United States, 483 U.S. 171 , 107 S.Ct. 2775 , 97 L.Ed.2d 144 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Michael Lee Bolick
See also United States v. James, 590 F.2d 575 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 917 , 99 S.Ct. 2836 , 61 L.Ed.2d 283 (1979); United States v. Macklin, 573 F.2d 1046, 1049, n. 3 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 852 , 99 S.Ct. 160 , 58 L.Ed.2d 157 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Marvin P. Johnson, Robert A. Wilkins, Duane Quamina, Patricia Gordon, Mark Francis Johnson
Thus, based on the theory of conspiracy, “[i]t has always been the law that where an indictment alleges a conspiracy to commit several offenses against the United States, the charge is sustained by adequate pleadings and proof of conspiracy to commit any one of the offenses.” United States v. James, 528 F.2d 999, 1014 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 959 , 97 S.Ct. 382 , 50 L.Ed.2d 326 (1976); see also United States v. Wedelstedt, 589 F.2d 339, 340 (8th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 916 , 99 S.Ct. 2836 , 61 L.Ed.2d 283 (1979); United States v. Dixon, 536 F.2d 1388, 1401-02 (2d Cir. 1…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Wedelstedt
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 78-1383.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 4, 1979.
Published
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.