green
Positive treatment
3.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Langley v. Ryder
Pro. art. 382 (criminal prosecution instituted by way of indictment, information, or affidavit); cf. Barancik v. Investors Funding Corp., 489 F.2d 933 (7th Cir.1973) (section 2283 does not bar issuance of the injunction if the state action was not pending when the federal injunction is sought, even though the state action commenced prior to federal action on the request; but cf. Roth v. Bank of the Commonwealth, 583 F.2d 527 (6th Cir.1978), cert. dismissed, 442 U.S. 925 , 99 S.Ct. 2852 , 61 L.Ed.2d 292 (1979) (contrary view). 1 The Younger doctrine also does not apply here, although for a slig…
cited
Cited "see"
Stile v. COPLEY TP., OHIO
See Roth v. Bank of the Commonwealth, 583 F.2d 527, 537-38 (6th Cir.1978), ce rt. dismissed, 442 U.S. 925 , 99 S.Ct. 2852 , 61 L.Ed.2d 292 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Smith v. Securities & Exchange Commission
See Roth v. Bank of Commonwealth, 583 F.2d 527, 538 (6th Cir.1978), ce rt. dismissed, 442 U.S. 925 , 99 S.Ct. 2852 , 61 L.Ed.2d 292 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,565 Richard J. Smith v. Securities and Exchange Commission, (95-5862/6625), Elaine Cacheris Sandy Harris David M. Rosen and Any Other Persons Acting in Concert Therewith, (95-5862), (95-6625)
See Roth v. Bank of Commonwealth, 583 F.2d 527, 538 (6th Cir.1978), cert. dismissed, 442 U.S. 925 , 99 S.Ct. 2852 , 61 L.Ed.2d 292 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cabot Corp. v. King
See Roth v. Bank of the Commonwealth, 583 F.2d 527, 537-38 (6th Cir.1978), cert. granted, 440 U.S. 944 , 99 S.Ct. 1420 , 59 L.Ed.2d 632 cert. dismissed, 442 U.S. 925 , 99 S.Ct. 2852 , 61 L.Ed.2d 292 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wayside Farm, Inc. v. Bowen
See Roth v. Bank of the Commonwealth, 583 F.2d 527, 537-38 (6th Cir.1978), cert. granted, 440 U.S. 944 , 99 S.Ct. 1420 , 59 L.Ed.2d 632 , cert. dismissed, 442 U.S. 925 , 99 S.Ct. 2852 , 61 L.Ed.2d 292 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Brotherhood Of Locomotive Engineers v. Consolidated Rail Corporation
See Roth v. Bank of Commonwealth, 583 F.2d 527 (6th Cir.1978), cert. dismissed, 442 U.S. 925 , 99 S.Ct. 2852 , 61 L.Ed.2d 292 (1979); Urbain v. Knapp Mfg.
cited
Cited "see"
Division No. 1, Detroit, Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
See Roth v. Bank of Commonwealth, 583 F.2d 527 (6th Cir.1978), cert. dismissed, 442 U.S. 925 , 99 S.Ct. 2852 , 61 L.Ed.2d 292 (1979); Urbain v. Knapp Mfg.
discussed
Cited "see"
Goldhaber v. Foley
See Roth v. Bank of the Commonwealth, 583 F.2d 527 (6th Cir. 1978), cert. dismissed, 442 U.S. 925 , 99 S.Ct. 2852 , 61 L.Ed.2d 292 (1979); Fitzgerald v. Mountain Laurel Racing, Inc., 464 F.Supp. 263, 269 (W.D.Pa.), aff’d, 607 F.2d 589 (3rd Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 956 , 100 S.Ct. 2927 , 64 L.Ed.2d 814 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Frisch's Restaurant, Inc. v. Shoney's Inc.
See also Roth v. Bank of the Commonwealth, 583 F.2d 527, 537 (6th Cir.1978), cert. dismissed, 442 U.S. 925 , 99 S.Ct. 2852 , 61 L.Ed.2d 292 (1979). "[T]he four considerations applicable to preliminary injunction decisions are factors to be balanced, not prerequisites that must be met." In re DeLorean Motor Co., 755 F.2d at 1229.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Frisch's Restaurant, Inc. v. Shoney's Inc.
See also Roth v. Bank of the Commonwealth, 583 F.2d 527, 537 (6th Cir.1978), cert. dismissed, 442 U.S. 925 , 99 S.Ct. 2852 , 61 L.Ed.2d 292 (1979). “[T]he four considerations applicable to preliminary injunction decisions are factors to be balanced, not prerequisites that must be met.” In re DeLorean Motor Co., 755 F.2d at 1229.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Accident Fund v. Baerwaldt
See e.g., Roth v. Bank of the Commonwealth, 583 F.2d 527, 537 (CA.6 1978), cert. dism’d, 442 U.S. 925 , 99 S.Ct. 2852 , 61 L.Ed.2d 292 (1979); Hart v. Ferris State College, 557 F.Supp. 1379 (WD.Mich.1983).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Haywood
v.
Illinois
v.
Illinois
No. 78-5950.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 4, 1979.
Published
440 U. S. 948. Motion for leave to file petition for rehearing denied.