Parry v. George, 439 U.S. 947 (1978). · Go Syfert
Search
Parry v. George, 439 U.S. 947 (1978). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“must be shown. the agreement becomes violative of section 1 of the sherman act only if it is anticompetitive in purpose and effect - in sum, it must be tested by the rule of reason.”
236 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 54 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Winter Hill Frozen Foods & Services, Inc. v. Haagen-Dazs Co. (mad, 1988-09-25) · Strongest negative: Hunt v. Mobil Oil Corp. (nysd, 1978-10-12)
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978 2002 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 49 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "but see" Hunt v. Mobil Oil Corp.
S.D.N.Y. · 1978 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see Oreck Corp. v. Whirlpool Corp., 579 F.2d 126 (2d Cir. 1978) (en banc), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 99 S.Ct. 340 , 58 L.Ed.2d 338 (1978). 42 .
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Winter Hill Frozen Foods & Services, Inc. v. Haagen-Dazs Co.
D. Mass. · 1988 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
must be shown. the agreement becomes violative of section 1 of the sherman act only if it is anticompetitive in purpose and effect - in sum, it must be tested by the rule of reason.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Johnson (2×)
Iowa · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
State v. Galloway, 187 N.W.2d 725, 728 (Iowa 1971); see State v. Cornell, 266 N.W.2d 15, 20 (Iowa), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 947 , 99 S.Ct. 340 , 58 L.Ed.2d 338 (1978) (holding trial court did not abuse its discretion in allowing the State to elicit from other witnesses the impeached witness’s out-of-court statements consistent with his trial testimony).
discussed Cited "see" K.M.B. Warehouse Distributors, Inc. v. Walker Manufacturing Company
2d Cir. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Oreck Corp. v. Whirlpool Corp., 579 F.2d 126, 133-34 (2d Cir.) (That another customer of the defendant convinced the defendant to cease dealings with plaintiff did not suffice to show anti-competitive effect.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 946 , 99 S.Ct. 340 , 58 L.Ed.2d 338 (1978); Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc., 429 U.S. 477, 488 , 97 S.Ct. 690, 697 , 50 L.Ed.2d 701 (1977) ("The antitrust laws ... were enacted for 'the protection of competition not competitors.' " (citation omitted)).
discussed Cited "see" K.M.B. Warehouse Distributors, Inc. v. Walker Manufacturing Co.
2d Cir. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Oreck Corp. v. Whirlpool Corp., 579 F.2d 126, 133-34 (2d Cir.) (That another customer of the defendant convinced the defendant to cease dealings with plaintiff did not suffice to show anti-competitive effect.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 946 , 99 S.Ct. 340 , 58 L.Ed.2d 338 (1978); Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc., 429 U.S. 477, 488 , 97 S.Ct. 690, 697 , 50 L.Ed.2d 701 (1977) (“The antitrust laws ... were enacted for ‘the protection of competition not competitors.’ ” (citation omitted)).
discussed Cited "see" Cornell v. State (2×)
Iowa Ct. App. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Cornell, 266 N.W.2d 15 (Iowa 1978), cert. denied, Cornell v. Iowa, 439 U.S. 947 , 99 S.Ct. 340 , 58 L.Ed.2d 338 (1978).
cited Cited "see" Re-Alco Industries, Inc. v. National Center for Health Education, Inc.
S.D.N.Y. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See Oreck Corp. v. Whirlpool Corp., 579 F.2d 126, 130 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 946 , 99 S.Ct. 340 , 58 L.Ed.2d 338 (1978).
examined Cited "see" Robert Allan Cornell v. Crispus Nix, Warden, Isp (4×)
8th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Cornell, 266 N.W.2d 15 (Iowa), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 947 , 99 S.Ct. 340 , 58 L.Ed.2d 338 (1978).
examined Cited "see" State v. Beynon (4×)
S.D. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Cornell, 266 N.W.2d 15, 20 (Iowa), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 947 , 99 S.Ct. 340 , 58 L.Ed.2d 338 (1978); State v. Coppola, 502 A.2d 802, 805 (R.I.1985).
discussed Cited "see" Retail Service Associates v. Conagra Pet Products Co.
D. Conn. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See Oreck Corp. v. Whirlpool Corp., 579 F.2d 126, 133 (2d Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 946 , 99 S.Ct. 340 , 58 L.Ed.2d 338 (1978); Blaine v. Meineke Discount Muffler Shop, Inc., 670 F.Supp. 1107, 1112 (D.Conn.1987); McKeown Distributors, Inc. v. Gyp-Crete Corp., 618 F.Supp. 632, 645 (D.Conn.1985).
cited Cited "see" Disenos Artisticos E Industriales, S.A. v. Work
E.D.N.Y · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See Oreck Corp. v. Whirlpool Corp., 579 F.2d 126, 131 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 946 , 99 S.Ct. 340 , 58 L.Ed.2d 338 (1978). 31 Other circuits have agreed with this conclusion.
cited Cited "see" MLC, INC. v. North American Philips Corp., Inc.
S.D.N.Y. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See Oreck Corp. v. Whirlpool Corp., 579 F.2d 126, 130 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 946 , 99 S.Ct. 340 , 58 L.Ed.2d 338 (1978).
discussed Cited "see" Topps Chewing Gum, Inc. v. Major League Baseball Players Ass'n
S.D.N.Y. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See Oreck Corp. v. Whirlpool Corp., 579 F.2d 126, 131 (2d Cir.) (en banc) (“It is important to distinguish between ‘horizontal’ restraints, i.e. agreements between competitors and ‘vertical’ restraints, i.e. combinations of persons at different levels of the market structure____ Horizontal restraints alone have been characterized as ‘naked restraints of trade with no purpose except stifling competition,’ ... and, therefore, per se violations of the Sherman Act.”) (emphasis added), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 946 , 99 S.Ct. 340 , 58 L.Ed.2d 338 (1978); Level I Sportswear, Inc. v. Cha…
discussed Cited "see" A.I. Root Co. v. Computer Dynamics, Inc.
N.D. Ohio · 1985 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord Com-Tel, Inc., supra, 669 F.2d at 409 (citing Oreck Corp. v. Whirlpool Corp., 579 F.2d 126, 131 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 946 , 99 S.Ct. 340 , 58 L.Ed.2d 338 (1978)); Muenster Butane, Inc. v. Stewart Co., 651 F.2d 292, 295 (5th Cir.1981).
discussed Cited "see" Bunch v. Artec International Corp.
S.D.N.Y. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See Oreck Corp. v. Whirlpool Corp., 579 F.2d 126, 131 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 946 , 99 S.Ct. 340 , 58 L.Ed.2d 338 (1978); see also White & White, Inc. v. American Hospital Supply, 540 F.Supp. 951, 1033-34 (W.D.Mich.1982). 10 .
discussed Cited "see" Graen's Mens Wear, Inc. v. Stille-Pierce Agency (2×)
Iowa · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Cornell, 266 N.W.2d 15, 20 (Iowa), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 947 , 99 S.Ct. 340 , 58 L.Ed.2d 338 (1978); State v. Galloway, 187 N.W.2d 725, 728 (Iowa 1971); State v. Vincent, 24 Iowa 570 , 574r-75 (1868).
discussed Cited "see" Laurence J. Gordon, Inc. v. Brandt, Inc.
W.D. Wash. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See Oreck Corp. v. Whirlpool Corp., 579 F.2d 126, 131 (2nd Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 946 , 99 S.Ct. 340 , 58 L.Ed.2d 338 , rehearing denied, 439 U.S. 1104 , 99 S.Ct. 883 , 59 L.Ed.2d 64 (1979).
cited Cited "see" White & White, Inc. v. American Hospital Supply Corp.
W.D. Mich. · 1982 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord, see Oreck Corp. v. Whirlpool Corp., 579 F.2d 126, 131 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 946 , 99 S.Ct. 340 , 58 L.Ed.2d 338 (1978).
discussed Cited "see" Battle v. Lubrizol Corporation
8th Cir. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See Oreck Corp. v. Whirlpool Corp., 579 F.2d 126 (2d Cir.) (banc), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 946 , 99 S.Ct. 340 , 58 L.Ed.2d 338 (1978) (applying rule of reason analysis); accord, Gough v. Rossmoor Corp., 585 F.2d 381 (9th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 936 , 99 S.Ct. 1280 , 59 L.Ed.2d 494 (1979); H & B Equipment Co. v. International Harvester Co., 577 F.2d 239 (5th Cir. 1978); see generally Comment, Vertical Agreements to Terminate Competing Distributors: Oreck Corp. v. Whirlpool Corp., 92 Harv.L.Rev. 1160 (1979) (supporting Oreck); Comment, Vertical Agreement as Horizontal Restraint: Cernut…
cited Cited "see" Roesch, Inc. And Marketing Division, Inc. v. Star Cooler Corporation, a Missouri Corporation Hussmann Refrigeration, Inc. And Tour Ice Midwest, Inc.
8th Cir. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See Oreck Corp. v. Whirlpool Corp., 579 F.2d 126, 137 (2d Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 946 , 99 S.Ct. 340 , 58 L.Ed.2d 338 (1978).
discussed Cited "see" Battle v. Lubrizol Corp.
8th Cir. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See Oreck Corp. v. Whirlpool Corp., 579 F.2d 126 (2d Cir.) (banc), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 946 , 99 S.Ct. 340 , 58 L.Ed.2d 338 (1978) (applying rule of reason analysis); • accord, Gough v. Rossmoor Corp., 585 F.2d 381 (9th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 936 , 99 S.Ct. 1280 , 59 L.Ed.2d 494 (1979); H & B Equipment Co. v. International Harvester Co., 577 F.2d 239 (5th Cir. 1978); see generally Comment, Vertical Agreements to Terminate Competing Distributors: Oreck Corp. v. Whirlpool Corp., 92 Harv.L.Rev. 1160 (1979) (supporting Oreck); Comment, Vertical Agreement as Horizontal Restraint: Ce…
cited Cited "see" Commonwealth v. Dane Entertainment Services, Inc.
Mass. App. Ct. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hays v. State, 145 Ga. App. 65, 66 , cert. denied, 439 U.S. 947 (1978).
cited Cited "see" Copy-Data Systems, Inc., and Synergistics, Inc. v. Toshiba America, Inc.
2d Cir. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See Oreck Corp. v. Whirlpool Corp., 579 F.2d 126, 133-34 (2d Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 946 , 99 S.Ct. 340 , 58 L.Ed.2d 338 (1978).
cited Cited "see" Bustop Shelters, Inc. v. Convenience & Safety Corp.
S.D.N.Y. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See Oreck Corp. v. Whirlpool Corp., 579 F.2d 126 (2d Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 946 , 99 S.Ct. 340 , 58 L.Ed.2d 338 (1978).
examined Cited "see" A. H. Cox & Company, a Corporation v. Star MacHinery Company, a Corporation Star Rentals, Inc., a Corporation and R. O. Products, Inc., a Corporation (3×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
9th Cir. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
Mutual Fund Investors, Inc. v. Putnam Management Co., supra, 553 F.2d at 626-27 ; see Oreck Corp. v. Whirlpool Corp., 579 F.2d 126 (2d Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 946 , 99 S.Ct. 340 , 58 L.Ed.2d 338 (1978).
examined Cited "see" A. H. Cox & Co. v. Star Machinery Co. (3×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
9th Cir. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
Mutual Fund Investors, Inc. v. Putnam Management Co., supra, 553 F.2d at 626-27 ; see Oreck Corp. v. Whirlpool Corp., 579 F.2d 126 (2d Cir.) (en bane), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 946 , 99 S.Ct. 340 , 58 L.Ed.2d 338 (1978).
discussed Cited "see" Watson v. Ray (2×)
S.D. Ohio · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See George v. Parry, 77 P.R.D. 421, 424 (S.D.N.Y.), aff’d 578 F.2d 1367 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 947 , 99 S.Ct. 340 , 58 L.Ed.2d 338 (1978); Held v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Co., 64 F.R.D. 346, 347-48 (S.D.Tex.1974).
discussed Cited "see" National Bank of Canada v. Interbank Card Ass'n
S.D.N.Y. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See Oreck Corp. v. Whirlpool Corp., 579 F.2d 126, 133 (2d Cir.) (remanding for new trial under rule of reason after jury verdict based on per se instructions) ce rt. denied 439 U.S. 946 , 99 S.Ct. 340 , 58 L.Ed.2d 338 (1978). 13 2.
discussed Cited "see" Michele Sindona v. George v. Grant, United States Marshal for the Southern District of New York, George v. Grant, United States Marshal for the Southern District of New York v. Michele Sindona (2×)
2d Cir. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Fritz, 580 F.2d 370 , 375 n.1 (10 Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 947 , 99 S.Ct. 340 , 58 L.Ed.2d 338 (1978).
discussed Cited "see" Sindona v. Grant (2×)
2d Cir. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Fritz, 580 F.2d 370 , 375 n.1 (10 Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 947 , 99 S.Ct. 340 , 58 L.Ed.2d 338 (1978).
discussed Cited "see" Nifty Foods Corporation v. The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc. And Pet Incorporated
2d Cir. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See Oreck Corp. v. Whirlpool Corp., 579 F.2d 126 (2d Cir. 1978) (en banc), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 946 , 99 S.Ct. 340 , 58 L.Ed.2d 338 , reh. denied, 439 U.S. 1104 , 99 S.Ct. 883 , 59 L.Ed.2d 65 (1978).
discussed Cited "see" Ambook Enterprises v. Time Incorporated
2d Cir. · 1979 · signal: see · confidence high
See Oreck Corp. v. Whirlpool Corp., 579 F.2d 126 (2 Cir.) (en banc), Cert. denied, 439 U.S. 946 , 99 S.Ct. 340 , 58 L.Ed.2d 338 (1978); Gough v. Rossmoor Corp., 585 F.2d 381, 387 (9 Cir. 1978), Cert. denied, 440 U.S. 936 , 99 S.Ct. 1280 , 59 L.Ed.2d 494 (1979); Sullivan, Antitrust § 90 (1977).
discussed Cited "see" Ambook Enterprises v. Time Inc.
2d Cir. · 1979 · signal: see · confidence high
See Oreck Corp. v. Whirlpool Corp., 579 F.2d 126 (2 Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 946 , 99 S.Ct. 340 , 58 L.Ed.2d 338 (1978); Gough v. Rossmoor Corp., 585 F.2d 381, 387 (9 Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 936 , 99 S.Ct. 1280 , 59 L.Ed.2d 494 (1979); Sullivan, Antitrust § 90 (1977).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Parts Depot Co. v. Florida Auto Supply
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1996 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Oreck Corp. v. Whirlpool Corp., 579 F.2d 126, 128 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 946 , 99 S.Ct. 340 , 58 L.Ed.2d 338 (1978).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Volmar Distributors, Inc. v. New York Post Co., Inc.
S.D.N.Y. · 1993 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Oreck Corp. v. Whirlpool Corp., 579 F.2d 126 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 946 , 99 S.Ct. 340 , 58 L.Ed.2d 338 (1978).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Belfiore v. New York Times Co.
D. Conn. · 1986 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Oreck Corp. v. Whirlpool Corp., 579 F.2d 126 , 130 n. 5, 133-34 (2 Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 946 , 99 S.Ct. 340 , 58 L.Ed.2d 338 (1978).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Westman Commission Company, Cross-Appellant v. Hobart International, Inc., Cross-Appellee (2×)
10th Cir. · 1986 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Oreck Corp. v. Whirlpool Corp., 579 F.2d 126, 133-34 (2d Cir.1978) (en banc), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 946 , 99 S.Ct. 340 , 58 L.Ed.2d 338 (1979); Ace Beer Distributors v. Kohn, Inc., 318 F.2d 283 , 286-87 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 922 , 84 S.Ct. 267 , 11 L.Ed.2d 166 (1963); Packard Motor Car Co. v. Webster Motor Car Co., 243 F.2d 418, 420-21 (D.C.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Woodbury Daily Times Co. v. Los Angeles Times-Washington Post News Service
D.N.J. · 1985 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, Oreck Corp. v. Whirlpool Corp., 579 F.2d 126, 131 (2nd Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 946 , 99 S.Ct. 340 , 58 L.Ed.2d 338 (1979).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Uniroyal, Inc. v. Hoff and Thames, Inc.
S.D. Miss. · 1981 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Oreck Corp. v. Whirlpool Corp., 579 F.2d 126 (2nd Cir. en banc 1975), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 946 , 99 S.Ct. 340 , 58 L.Ed.2d 338 (1978); Dougherty v. Continental Oil Co., 579 F.2d 954, 961, n.3 (5th Cir. 1978). 2 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Thorp (2×)
D. Colo. · 1980 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., United States v. Fritz, 580 F.2d 370, 377 (10th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 947 , 99 S.Ct. 340 , 58 L.Ed.2d 338 (the test of voluntariness is whether the incriminating statements were “in any way coerced so as not to be the product of the free, independent will of the confessor”).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Wellman v. Dickinson (2×)
S.D.N.Y. · 1980 · signal: see also · confidence low
Munsey Trust v. Sycor, Inc., 457 F.Supp. 924, 926 (S.D.N.Y.1978) (MacMahon, J.); Feder v. Harrington, supra, 58 F.R.D. at 174-75 ; see also George v. Parry, 77 F.R.D. 421, 424 (S.D.N.Y.) (MacMahon, J.), aff’d, 578 F.2d 1367 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 947 , 99 S.Ct. 340 , 58 L.Ed.2d 338 (1978).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Campbell (2×)
Iowa · 1980 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., State v. Cornell, 266 N.W.2d 15, 18 (Iowa), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 947 , 99 S.Ct. 340 , 58 L.Ed.2d 338 (1978); State v. Richardson, 137 Iowa 591, 594 , 115 N.W. 220, 221-22 (1908).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Aladdin Oil Company v. Texaco, Inc. And Poweram Oil Co., Inc.
5th Cir. · 1979 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Oreck Corp. v. Whirlpool Corp., 579 F.2d 126, 133 (2d Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 946 , 99 S.Ct. 340 , 58 L.Ed.2d 338 (1978); Northwest Power Products, Inc. v. Omark Industries, 576 F.2d 83, 87 (5th Cir. 1978); Dillon Materials Handling Inc. v. Albion Industries, 567 F.2d 1299 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 832 , 99 S.Ct. 111 , 58 L.Ed.2d 127 (1978); Universal Brands, Inc. v. Philip Morris, Inc., 546 F.2d 30, 33 (5th Cir. 1977); Dreibus v. Wilson, 529 F.2d 170 (9th Cir. 1975).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Mannington Mills, Inc. v. Congoleum Industries, Inc. (2×)
3rd Cir. · 1979 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Cernuto, 595 F.2d at 168 -69 With Oreck Corp. v. Whirlpool Corp., 579 F.2d 126 (2d Cir.) (En banc ), Cert. denied, 439 U.S. 946 , 99 S.Ct. 340 , 58 L.Ed.2d 338 (1978).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Sherman v. British Leyland Motors, Ltd.
9th Cir. · 1979 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Oreck Corp. v. Whirlpool Corp., 579 F.2d 126 (2d Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 946 , 99 S.Ct. 340 , 58 L.Ed.2d 338 (1978). .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Gary H. Sherman v. British Leyland Motors, Ltd.
9th Cir. · 1979 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Oreck Corp. v. Whirlpool Corp., 579 F.2d 126 (2d Cir.) (En banc ), Cert. denied, 439 U.S. 946 , 99 S.Ct. 340 , 58 L.Ed.2d 338 (1978) 44 This act provides in the only part that could be relevant here: It shall be unlawful for any person engaged in commerce, in the course of such commerce . . . to . . . make a sale or contract for sale of goods . . . machinery . . . or other commodities . . . for use . . . or resale within the United States . . . on the condition, agreement, or understanding that the lessee or purchaser thereof shall not use or deal in the goods . . . machinery . . . or…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Wedgewood Investment Corp. v. International Harvester Co.
Ariz. Ct. App. · 1979 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Oreck Corp. v. Whirlpool Corp., 579 F.2d 126 (2nd Cir.) cert. denied 439 U.S. 946 , 99 S.Ct. 340 , 58 L.Ed.2d 338 (1978); Eastcoast Equipment Co. v. Harnischfeger Corp., 354 F.Supp. 335 (E.D.Pa.1973); Potter’s Photographic Applications Co. v. Ealing Corp., 292 F.Supp. 92 (E.D.N.Y.1968).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Cernuto, Inc. v. United Cabinet Corp.
3rd Cir. · 1979 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Schwing Motor Co. v. Hudson Sales Corp., 138 F.Supp. 899 (D.Md.), aff’d, 239 F.2d 176 (4th Cir. 1956), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 823 , 78 S.Ct. 30 , 2 L.Ed.2d 38 (1957). . 579 F.2d 126 (2d Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 99 S.Ct. 340 , 58 L.Ed.2d 338 (1978). .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Cernuto, Incorporated v. United Cabinet Corporation
3rd Cir. · 1979 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Schwing Motor Co. v. Hudson Sales Corp., 138 F.Supp. 899 (D.Md.), Aff'd, 239 F.2d 176 (4th Cir. 1956), Cert. denied, 355 U.S. 823 , 78 S.Ct. 30 , 2 L.Ed.2d 38 (1957) 23 579 F.2d 126 (2d Cir.) (En banc ), Cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 99 S.Ct. 340 , 58 L.Ed.2d 338 (1978) 24 Id. 130 25 On the other hand, if United acted in pursuit of its own policy, but that policy was itself a form of resale price maintenance, involving other parties in its enforcement, it might constitute a Per se violation of the Act under United States v. Parke, Davis & Co., 362 U.S. 29 , 80 S.Ct. 503 , 4 L.Ed.2d 505…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Parry, Commissioner, Department of Social Services of Orange County
v.
George
No. 78-384.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 30, 1978.
439 U.S. 947
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 86%
Citer courts: D. Massachusetts (1)

C. A. 2d Cir. Motion of respondents for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.