green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.6 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1987 ·
…rules which exclude relevant evidence which is not competent are permissible
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Major Burrus v. Warren Young, Superintendent, and the Attorney General of the State of Wisconsin
(2×)
rules which exclude relevant evidence which is not competent are permissible
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Wong
See Hughes v. Mathews (C.A.7, 1978), 576 F.2d 1250 , certiorari denied (1978), 439 U.S. 801 , 99 S.Ct. 43 , 58 L.Ed.2d 94 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Keystone Insurance v. Houghton
See County of Cook v. Berger, 648 F.Supp. 433 (N.D.Ill.1986) (relying on US. v. Field, 432 F.Supp. 55, 59 (S.D.N.Y.1977), aff'd mem., 578 F.2d 1371 (2d Cir.), cert. dismissed, 439 U.S. 801 , 99 S.Ct. 43 , 58 L.Ed.2d 94 (1978)); accord Charter Oak Ins.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Tillman
(2×)
The major purpose of the crime of felony murder is to reach negligent or accidental killings that would not otherwise qualify as murder."); see also Wilson, 1 Cal.3d at 440 , 462 P.2d at 28 , 82 Cal. Rptr. at 500 ; State v. Lashley, 233 Kan. 620, 631 , 664 P.2d 1358, 1369 (1983). [85] Utah Code Ann. § 76-5-202 (Supp. 1973); see also Utah Code Ann. § 76-5-202 (1978 & Supp. 1987). [86] Model Penal Code § 210.6(3) (1980). [87] Model Penal Code § 210.2 (1980); see also § 210.2 comment 7, at 42 (1980). [88] Model Penal Code § 210.6 comment 7, at 142 (1980). [89] Id.; see also § 210.6 comment…
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Rogers
See id. at 1051-52 (duplicative evidence may be excluded in court’s discretion) . . . see also Hughes v. Matthews, 576 F.2d 1250, 1258 (7th Cir.) (‘the right of a defendant to present relevant and competent evidence is not absolute and may “bow to accommodate other legitimate interests in the criminal trial process” ’), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 801 , 99 S. Ct. 43 , 58 L.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Castellano
See United States v. Field, 432 F.Supp. 55, 59 (S.D.N.Y.1977) (Lasker, J.), summarily affd, 578 F.2d 1371 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 801 , 99 S.Ct. 43 , 58 L.Ed.2d 94 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
The Kansas Power & Light Company, State Corporation Commission of the State of Kansas, Intervening v. Burlington Northern Railroad Company
See McLouth Steel Corp. v. Jewell Coal & Coke Co., 570 F.2d 594 (6th Cir.1978), cert. dismissed, 439 U.S. 801 , 99 S.Ct. 43 , 58 L.Ed.2d 94 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Charles T. Walsh and Bowe, Walsh & Associates
See United States v. Field, 432 F.Supp. 55, 59 (S.D.N.Y.1977), aff’d mem., 578 F.2d 1371 (2d Cir.), cert. dismissed, 439 U.S. 801 , 99 S.Ct. 43 , 58 L.Ed.2d 94 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lawrence Gilbert Chesher
(2×)
See United States v. Field, 432 F.Supp. 55, 59-60 (D.C.N.Y.1977), aff’d. mem., 578 F.2d 1371 (2d Cir.), cert, dism’d., 439 U.S. 801 , 99 S.Ct. 43 , 58 L.Ed.2d 94 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
South States Oil & Gas Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
See Tenneco Oil Co. v. FERC, 571 F.2d 834, 837 (5th Cir.), cert. dismissed, 439 U.S. 801 , 99 S.Ct. 43 , 58 L.Ed.2d 94 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Miskovsky v. State
(2×)
See also United States v. Field, 432 F.Supp. 55, 59 (S.D.N.Y.1977), cert. dismissed, 439 U.S. 801 , 99 S.Ct. 43 , 58 L.Ed.2d 94 (1978). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Strickland v. Linahan
See also, Hughes v. Mathews, 576 F.2d 1250 (7th Cir.1978) (no Fifth Amendment violation by admitting psychiatric testimony when the defendant admitted that he did the act and argued only that he lacked the specific intent required by the act), cert. dismissed, 439 U.S. 801 , 99 S.Ct. 43 , 58 L.Ed.2d 94 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Daniel Bifield
See id. at 1051-52 (duplicative evidence may be excluded in court’s discretion); United States v. DeStefano, 476 F.2d 324, 330 (7th Cir.1973) (court violates accused person’s constitutional right to present full defense when it denies him right to call an available witness, but no violation occurs unless witness denied to defendant could have produced relevant and material testimony); see also Hughes v. Matthews, 576 F.2d 1250, 1258 (7th Cir.) (“the right of a defendant to present relevant and competent evidence is not absolute and may ‘bow to accommodate other legitimate interests in …
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
The Upjohn Company v. Rachelle Laboratories, Inc. And International Rectifier Corporation,defendants-Appellants
See, e. g., McLouth Steel Corp. v. Jewell Coal and Coke Co., 570 F.2d 594, 608 (6th Cir.), cert. dismissed, 439 U.S. 801 , 99 S.Ct. 43 , 58 L.Ed.2d 94 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Vanderbush Sheet Metal Co.
See, e. g., McLouth Steel Corp. v. Jewell Coal & Coke Co., 570 F.2d 594 (6th Cir.), cert. dismissed, 439 U.S. 801 , 99 S.Ct. 43 , 58 L.Ed.2d 94 (1978); Mott v. Rowland, 85 Mich. 561 , 48 N.W. 638 (1891); Lake States Engineering Corp. v. Lawrence Seaway Corp., supra. In this case, the documents which comprise the contract are printed forms and typed pages on Toledo’s letterhead.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
McLouth Steel Corp.
v.
Jewell Coal & Coke Co.
v.
Jewell Coal & Coke Co.
No. 77-1676.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jul 21, 1978.
Published
Citer courts: Seventh Circuit (2)
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari dismissed July 21, 1978, under this Court’s Rule 60.