green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
11.0 score
“it is not necessary for a charge of conspiracy to have been brought in order for coconspirator hearsay to become admissible.”
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 28 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Hadi Zandi, United States of America v. Mehdi Zandi
it is not necessary for a charge of conspiracy to have been brought in order for coconspirator hearsay to become admissible.
examined
Cited "see"
95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9376, 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 16,355 United States of America v. Anthony C. Sarno and Charles W. Knapp, (Two Cases). United States of America v. Joseph v. Nash
(4×)
See United States v. Weiner, 578 F.2d 757, 785-86 (9th Cir.) (analyzing "false statement" convictions under various securities laws), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 981 , 99 S.Ct. 568 , 58 L.Ed.2d 651 (1978); see also United States v. Simon, 425 F.2d 796, 805 (2d Cir.1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 1006 , 90 S.Ct. 1235 , 25 L.Ed.2d 420 (1970).
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Sarno
(4×)
See United States v. Weiner, 578 F.2d 757, 785-86 (9th Cir.) (analyzing “false statement” convictions under various securities laws), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 981 , 99 S.Ct. 568 , 58 L.Ed.2d 651 (1978); see also United States v. Simon, 425 F.2d 796, 805 (2d Cir.1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 1006 , 90 S.Ct. 1235 , 25 L.Ed.2d 420 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Billie Jo Dotson
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See abo United States v. Pierorazio, 578 F.2d 48, 49-51 (3rd Cir.) (citing cases), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 981 , 99 S.Ct. 568 , 58 L.Ed.2d 652 (1978). .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Welton Zolicoffer
(2×)
See United States v. Pierorazio, 578 F.2d 48 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 981 , 99 S.Ct. 568 , 58 L.Ed.2d 652 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Donald Johnstone
See United States v. Pierorazio, 578 F.2d 48, 51 (3d Cir.) ("[W]e hold that proof of an underlying inchoate crime, such as attempt or conspiracy ..., is sufficient to sustain a facilitation conviction under § 843(b).”), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 981 , 99 S.Ct. 568 , 58 L.Ed.2d 652 (1978); see also United States v. Thomas, 586 F.2d 123 (9th Cir.1978) (proof of inchoate crime of conspiracy as underlying felony in § 843(b) prosecution is sufficient). 6 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Joseph Charles Bonanno, Jr.
See United States v. Weiner, 578 F.2d 757, 766 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 981 , 99 S.Ct. 568 , 58 L.Ed.2d 651 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael Paris
(2×)
See United States v. Weiner, 578 F.2d 757 , 771 & n. 12 (9th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 981 , 99 S.Ct. 568 , 58 L.Ed.2d 651 (1978); see also United States v. Tindle, 808 F.2d 319, 326-28 (4th Cir.1986) (rejecting immunity claim on similar facts); United States v. Adams, 759 F.2d 1099, 1107 (3d Cir.) (calling similar claim "without merit”) (dictum), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 971 , 106 S.Ct. 336 , 88 L.Ed.2d 321 (1985). .
cited
Cited "see"
People v. Reyher
See United States v. Weiner, 578 F.2d 757 (9th Cir.), cert. denied 439 U.S. 981 , 99 S.Ct. 568 , 58 L.Ed.2d 651 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Joseph C. Gallo Frederick Graewe Hartmut Graewe, Kevin Joseph McTaggart Angelo A. Lonardo
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See United States v. Weiner, 578 F.2d 757, 789 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 981 , 99 S.Ct. 568 , 58 L.Ed.2d 651 (1978); United States v. Piascik, 559 F.2d 545, 549-50 (9th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1062 , 98 S.Ct. 1235 , 55 L.Ed.2d 762 (1978); Houston v. United States, 419 F.2d 30, 34 (5th Cir.1969).
cited
Cited "see"
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Whitman
See SEC v. Csapo, 533 F.2d 7 (D.C.Cir.1976); see generally United States v. Weiner, 578 F.2d 757, 773 (9th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 981 , 99 S.Ct. 568 , 58 L.Ed.2d 651 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Cleveland R. Rodgers
See United States v. Pierorazio, 578 F.2d 48, 50 (3d Cir.) (generally comparing old and new sections), ce rt. denied, 439 U.S. 981 , 99 S.Ct. 568 , 58 L.Ed.2d 652 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Alfred A. Johnson
(2×)
United States v. Schroeder, 433 F.2d 846, 851 (8th Cir.1970); see United States v. Weiner, 578 F.2d 757, 764 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 981 , 99 S.Ct. 568 , 58 L.Ed.2d 651 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Tarzian
See, United States v. Weiner, 578 F.2d 757 (9th Cir.1978) cert. denied 439 U.S. 981 , 99 S.Ct. 568 , 58 L.Ed.2d 651 (1978). 3 Addition *242 ally, defendant’s argument in reliance on Ernst and Ernst v. Hochfelder, 425 U.S. 185 , 96 S.Ct. 1375 , 47 L.Ed.2d 668 (1976) and other cases construing S.E.C.
cited
Cited "see"
Alfred B. Freeman v. Chicago Musical Instrument Co.
See Comden v. Superior Court, *722 20 Cal.3d 906 , 145 Cal.Rptr. 9, 16 , 576 P.2d 971, 978 , cert. denied, 439 U.S. 981 , 99 S.Ct. 568 , 58 L.Ed.2d 652 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Hansen
(2×)
See United States v. Weiner, 578 F.2d 757 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 981 , 99 S.Ct. 568 , 58 L.Ed.2d 651 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Carl Fielding
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See United States v. Weiner, 578 F.2d 757, 768 (9th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 981 , 99 S.Ct. 568 , 58 L.Ed.2d 651 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. James C. Hamilton
See United States v. Weiner, 578 F.2d 757 (CA9 1978), cert. denied 439 U.S. 981 , 99 S.Ct. 568 , 58 L.Ed.2d 651 .
cited
Cited "see"
Central Power & Light Co. v. Public Utility Commission of Texas
See Central Power & Light Co. v. FERC, 188 U.S.App.D.C. 56 , 575 F.2d 937 , cert. denied, - U.S. -, 99 S.Ct. 568 , 58 L.Ed.2d 652 (1978). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Central Power And Light Company v. The Public Utility Commission Of Texas
See Central Power & Light Co. v. FERC, 188 U.S.App.D.C. 56 , 575 F.2d 937 , Cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 99 S.Ct. 568 , 58 L.Ed.2d 652 (1978) 2 Dismissal without prejudice, rather than a stay, is appropriate in abstention cases in which Texas courts are involved.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rex G. Endicott
United States v. Crisco, 725 F.2d 1228, 1233 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 977 , 104 S.Ct. 2360 , 80 L.Ed.2d 832 (1984); see also United States v. Weiner, 578 F.2d 757, 765 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 981 , 99 S.Ct. 568 , 58 L.Ed. 2d 651 (1978) (contact between juror and court bailiff not prejudicial).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mid-Tex Electric Cooperative v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
“As a result, it becomes crucial that the Commission’s order include a reasoned opinion detailing those factual elements in the record that underlie the Commission’s actions.” Public Systems v. FERC, 606 F.2d 973 , 979 (D.C.Cir.1979) (reviewing an agency decision under the identical review provision of the Natural Gas Act); see also Central Power & Light Co. v. FERC, 575 F.2d 937 , 939 (D.C.Cir.) (FERC has an “obligation to articulate its reasoning” for agency actions), cert. denied, Dallas Power & Light Co. v. Central Power & Light Co., 439 U.S. 981 , 99 S.Ct. 568 , 58 L.Ed.2d 652…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Elmer Mims, United States of America v. Franklin Michael Einfeldt, United States of America v. Le Minh Thanh, United States of America v. Roger W. Techau, United States of America v. Burdell Doolin
See also United States v. Pierorazio, 578 F.2d 48, 51 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 981 , 99 S.Ct. 568 , 58 L.Ed.2d 652 (1978). 8 As noted previously, when considering the sufficiency of the evidence underlying a jury verdict, this court must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Mims
See also United States v. Pierorazio, 578 F.2d 48, 51 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 981 , 99 S.Ct. 568 , 58 L.Ed.2d 652 (1978). 8 As noted previously, when considering the sufficiency of the evidence underlying a jury verdict, this court must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Gray
See, e.g., United States v. Weiner, 578 F.2d 757, 768 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 981 , 99 S.Ct. 568 , 58 L.Ed.2d 651 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Rougemont
See, e.g., United States v. Weiner, 578 F.2d 757 (9th Cir.1978), cert. denied 439 U.S. 981 , 99 S.Ct. 568 , 58 L.Ed.2d 651 (1978); Benton v. State, 394 So.2d 474 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1981); Sinns v. State, 248 Ga. 385 , 283 S.E.2d 479 (1981); State v. Newman, 326 N.W.2d 796 (Iowa 1982); State v. Tripp, 52 N.C.App. 244 , 278 S.E.2d 592 (1981); State v. Bolling, 246 S.E.2d 631 (W.Va.1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United Pacific Insurance Co. v. Zardenetta
When the client’s right to counsel of his choice and the need to maintain ethical standards of professional responsibility clash “[T]he preservation of public trust both in the scrupulous administration of justice and in the integrity of the bar is paramount ...” and “[The client’s recognizably important right to counsel of his choice] must yield, however, to considerations of ethics which run to the very integrity of the judicial process.” Hull v. Celanese Corp., 513 F.2d 568, 572 (2d Cir.1975); see also Comden v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County, 20 Cal.3d 906 , 576 P.2d 971 …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Espiefs v. Settle
See also U. S. v. Weiner, 578 F.2d 757 (9th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 981 , 99 S.Ct. 568 , 58 L.Ed.2d 651 (mem.1978) rehearing denied 439 U.S. 1135 , 99 S.Ct. 1060 , 59 L.Ed.2d 98 (mem.1979); U. S. v. Seiffert, 463 F.2d 1980 (5th Cir. 1972) on remand 357 F.Supp. 801 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Comden et ux.
v.
Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles (Doris Day Distributing Co., Real Parties in Interest)
v.
Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles (Doris Day Distributing Co., Real Parties in Interest)
No. 78-305.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 27, 1978.
Cited by 4 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Fourth Circuit (1)
Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.