green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
8.5 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1987 ·
…if judicial self-restraint is ever desirable, it is when a rule 403 analysis of a trial court is reviewed by an appellate tribunal.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 25 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Cowgill, Stella, of the Estate of George Cowgill, Deceased and Individually v. Raymark Industries, Inc. H.K. Porter Company, Inc. Pacor, Inc. Eagle-Picher Industries, J.P. Stevens & Company, Garlock, Inc., Precision Seal Division, Southern Textile Company, Armstrong World Industries, Inc., Nicolet, Inc., Keene Corporation, Owens-Illinois Glass Company, Celotex Corporation, Gaf Corporation, Fibreboard Corporation, Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation, Forty-Eight Insulation, Inc. Pittsburgh Corning Corporation, C.E. Refractories v. Porter Hayden, Co., Lafavorite Rubber Mfg. Co. Appeal of Stella Cowgill
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
if judicial self-restraint is ever desirable, it is when a rule 403 analysis of a trial court is reviewed by an appellate tribunal.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Cowgill v. Raymark Industries, Inc.
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
if judicial self-restraint is ever desirable, it is when a rule 403 analysis of a trial court is reviewed by an appellate tribunal.
discussed
Cited "see"
Gipson v. Younes
(2×)
Duncan v. Wells , 23 F.3d 1322 , 1323-24 (8th Cir. 1994); see United States v. Long , 574 F.2d 761 , 767 (3d Cir.) (`If judicial selfrestraint is ever desirable, it is when a Rule 403 analysis of a trial court is reviewed by an appellate tribunal.'), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 985 , 99 S.Ct. 577 , 58 L.Ed.2d 657 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Williams v. Nebraska State Penitentiary
Duncan v. Wells, 23 F.3d 1322, 1323-24 (8th Cir.1994); see United States v. Long, 574 F.2d 761, 767 (3rd Cir.) ("If judicial self-restraint is ever desirable, it is when a Rule 403 analysis of a trial court is reviewed by an appellate tribunal."), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 985 , 99 S.Ct. 577 , 58 L.Ed.2d 657 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Williams v. Nebraska State Penitentiary
Duncan v. Wells, 23 F.3d 1322, 1323-24 (8th Cir.1994); see United States v. Long, 574 F.2d 761, 767 (3rd Cir.) (“If judicial self-restraint is ever desirable, it is when a Rule 403 analysis of a trial court is reviewed by an appellate tribunal.”), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 985 , 99 S.Ct. 577 , 58 L.Ed.2d 657 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert Peter Russell
See United States v. Long, 574 F.2d 761, 766 (3d Cir.) (“The draftsmen of Rule 404(b) intended it to be construed as one of ‘inclusion,’ and not ‘exclusion.’ They intended to emphasize admissibility of ‘other crime’ evidence.”), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 985 , 99 S.Ct. 577 , 58 L.Ed.2d 657 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bullock v. Foley Bros. Dry Goods Corp.
National Bellas Hess v. Illinois Department of Revenue, 386 U.S. 753 , 87 S.Ct. 1389 , 18 L.Ed.2d 505 (1967) (states cannot require out-of-state mail order firms to collect state sales/use taxes if their business presence in the state was limited to the sending of sales catalogs or other forms of advertising because it was an undue burden on interstate commerce); see Bullock v. Lone Star Gas Co., 567 S.W.2d 493, 497 (Tex.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 985 , 99 S.Ct. 577 , 58 L.Ed.2d 657 (1978); Bullock v. Delta Industrial Construction Co., 668 S.W.2d 502 (Tex.App.1984, no writ); see generally, 85 C…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Traitz
See United States v. Scarfo, 850 F.2d at 1019 ("[i]f judicial self restraint is ever desirable, it is when a Rule 403 analysis of a trial court is reviewed by an appellate tribunal."), citing, United States v. Long, 574 F.2d 761, 767 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 985 , 99 S.Ct. 577 , 58 L.Ed.2d 657 (1978). 122 Appellants contend that notwithstanding the merits of the district court's analysis concerning the admissibility of the tapes under Rules 403 and 404(b), the district court erred in admitting the evidence without requiring the government to prove that the tapes were admissible pursua…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Traitz
See United States v. Scarfo, 850 F.2d at 1019 (“[i]f judicial self restraint is ever desirable, it is when a Rule 403 analysis of a trial court is reviewed by an appellate tribunal.”), citing, United States v. Long, 574 F.2d 761, 767 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 985 , 99 S.Ct. 577 , 58 L.Ed.2d 657 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. George W. Anderson A/K/A \Asmar\". Appeal of George Anderson
See United States v. Long, 574 F.2d 761, 768 (3d Cir.) cert. denied 439 U.S. 985 , 99 S.Ct. 577 , 58 L.Ed.2d 657 (1978). 27 In this case, over $21,000 was found.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Anderson
See United States v. Long, 574 F.2d 761, 768 (3d Cir.) cert. denied 439 U.S. 985 , 99 S.Ct. 577 , 58 L.Ed.2d 657 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Mario F. Driggs
See United States v. Long, 574 F.2d 761 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 985 , 99 S.Ct. 577 , 58 L.Ed.2d 657 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hoag v. Valley National Bank
See North Carolina National Bank v. South Carolina National Bank, 449 F.Supp. 616 (D.S.C.1976), aff’d, 573 F.2d 1305 (4th Cir.1978), cert. den., 439 U.S. 985 , 99 S.Ct. 577 , 58 L.Ed.2d 657 (1978); Barkley Clark, The Law of Bank Deposits, Collections and Credit Cards, §§ 5.7, 5.8 (Revised ed. 1981, 1985 Cumulative Supplement No. 2); White & Summers, Uniform Commercial Code §§ 16-4, 17-7 (2d ed. 1980); Malcom, Reflections on West Side Bank, A Draftsman’s View, 18 Catholic University L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Johnson v. City of Fairbanks
(2×)
See United States v. Long, 574 F.2d 761, 766 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 985 , 99 S.Ct. 577 , 58 L.Ed.2d 657 (1978) (discussing the proper roles of trial and appellate courts respectively in applying comparable Federal Rules of Evidence 404(b) and 403).
cited
Cited "see"
William Nicholson and Floyd Little v. Lawrence Layton, Etc.
See United States v. Long, 574 F.2d 761, 767 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 985 , 99 S.Ct. 577 , 58 L.Ed.2d 657 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
American Petrofina, Inc. v. PPG Industries, Inc.
(2×)
See Bullock v. Lone Star Gas Co., 558 S.W.2d 566, 570 (Tex.Civ.App.—Waco 1977), rev’d on other grounds, 567 S.W.2d 493 , 99 S.Ct. 577 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Leon
See United States v. Long, 574 F.2d 761, 767 (3d Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 985 , 99 S.Ct. 577 , 58 L.Ed.2d 657 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Leon
See United States v. Long, 574 F.2d 761, 767 (3d Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 985 , 99 S.Ct. 577 , 58 L.Ed.2d 657 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Bullock v. Delta Industrial Construction Co.
See Bullock v. Lone Star Gas Co., 567 S.W.2d 493, 497 (Tex.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 985 , 99 S.Ct. 577 , 58 L.Ed.2d 657 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
U.S.A. Petroleum Corp. v. Anaconda Co.
See United States v. Long, 574 F.2d 761 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 985 , 99 S.Ct. 577 , 58 L.Ed.2d 657 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.
See United States v. Long, 574 F.2d 761 (3rd Cir.), cert, denied, 439 U.S. 985 , 99 S.Ct. 577 , 58 L.Ed.2d 657 (1978); John McShain, Inc. v. Cessna Aircraft Co., 563 F.2d 632 (3rd Cir. 1977); United States v. Flenory, 619 F. 2d 301 (3rd Cir. 1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
In the exercise of his discretion the district judge must weigh the probative value of rebuttal or impeachment evidence against its potential prejudicial impact under both Rule 403 and Rule 607. 3 Weinstein's Evidence P 607(05) at 607-52 & n.9, 607-55-56 (1977); See generally, United States v. Long, 574 F.2d 761 , (3rd Cir.), Cert. denied, 439 U.S. 985 , 99 S.Ct. 577 , 58 L.Ed.2d 657 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Pantone
In the exercise of his discretion the district judge must weigh the probative value of rebuttal or impeachment evidence against its potential prejudicial impact under both Rule 403 and Rule 607. 3 Weinstein’s Evidence ¶ 607[05] at 607-52 & n.9, 607-55-56 (1977); see generally, United States v. Long, 574 F.2d 761 , (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 985 , 99 S.Ct. 577 , 58 L.Ed.2d 657 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Arthur Doty v. Richard Sewall, Arthur Doty v. Richard Sewall
See also United States v. Long, 574 F.2d 761, 767 (3d Cir.) (“[i]f judicial self-restraint is ever desirable, it is when a Rule 403 analysis of a trial court is reviewed by an appellate tribunal”), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 985 , 99 S.Ct. 577 , 58 L.Ed.2d 657 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bankers Trust of South Carolina v. South Carolina National Bank
Jur. (2d) Banks Section 543 (1963); see also North Carolina National Bank v. South Carolina National Bank, 449 F. Supp. 616 (D.S.C. 1976), aff'd, 573 F. (2d) 1305 (4th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U. S. 985 , 99 S. Ct. 577 , 58 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lone Star Gas Co.
v.
Bullock, Comptroller of Public Accounts
v.
Bullock, Comptroller of Public Accounts
No. 78-595.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 27, 1978.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: Third Circuit (2)
Sup. Ct. Tex. Certiorari denied.