green
Positive treatment
4.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
Signer v. State
But see United States v. Trejo-Zambrano, 582 F.2d 460, 465 (9th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1005 , 99 S.Ct. 618 , 58 L.Ed.2d 682 (1978) (The prosecutor has no duty to provide the subsequent history of a conviction).
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Willard R. Sanders
(2×)
But see United States v. Trejo-Zambrano, 582 F.2d 460 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1005 , 99 S.Ct. 618 , 58 L.Ed.2d 682 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States of America, and v. Roger J. Hourihan, and Cross-Appellee
See United States v. Trejo-Zambrano, 582 F.2d 460 , 465 & n. 3 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1005 , 99 S.Ct. 618 , 58 L.Ed.2d 682 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Roberts
See United States v. Trejo-Zambrano, 582 F.2d 460, 464 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1005 (1978); United States v. Johnson, 488 F.2d 1206, 1210 (1st Cir. 1973) (noting that testimony before grand jury or other “preliminary and separate proceeding” does not waive right to assert privilege at trial) (quotation omitted); 1 McCormick on Evidence, supra § 140, at 528; cf. State v. Lavallee, 119 N.H. 207, 210 , 400 A.2d 480, 482 (1979) (finding that witness could assert privilege to avoid testifying at trial on matters she addressed during probable cause hearing, despite her prior admissio…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Premises Known as 25 Coligni Avenue
See United States v. Arroyo-Angulo, 580 F.2d 1137, 1144-45 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 913 , 99 S.Ct. 285 , 58 L.Ed.2d 260 , cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1005 , 99 S.Ct. 618 , 58 L.Ed.2d 618 , cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1131 , 99 S.Ct. 1052 , 59 L.Ed.2d 93 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Herbert Darrell Hay v. George P. Waldron
Further, in Wolfish the Supreme Court rejected the argument that a strip search, including the exposure of body cavities for visual inspection, must be predicated upon probable cause. 441 U.S. at 558, 560 , 99 S.Ct. at 1885 ; accord United States v. York, 578 F.2d 1036, 1041 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1005 , 99 S.Ct. 619 , 58 L.Ed.2d 682 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Edwin A. Pagan
See United States v. Trejo-Zambrano, 582 F.2d 460, 464 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1005 , 99 S.Ct. 618 , 58 L.Ed.2d 682 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Lapia
(2×)
See United States v. York, 578 F.2d 1036 (5th Cir.) cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1005 , 99 S.Ct. 619 , 58 L.Ed.2d 682 (1978) (strip searches and body cavity searches among the most intrusive.).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wells v. State
See United States v. York, 578 F.2d 1036 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1005 , 99 S.Ct. 619 , 58 L.Ed.2d 682 (1978) (no distinction between visitor and inmate); United States v. Hearst, 563 F.2d 1331 , 1345 n. 11 (9th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 1000 , 98 S.Ct. 1656 , 56 L.Ed.2d 90 (1978) (no distinction between pretrial detainee and inmate); Gettleman v. Werner, 377 F. Supp. 445, 451 (W.D.Pa. 1974) (no distinction between prison guard and inmate). [2] Many cases exhibit a reluctance to abandon a reasonableness requirement although at the same time declaring no fourth amendment prote…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Joseph
See United States v. Carvin, 555 F.2d 1303, 1305 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 971 , 99 S.Ct. 523 , 54 L.Ed.2d 461 (1978), and United States v. Haley, 581 F.2d 723, 726 (8th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1005 , 99 S.Ct. 618 , 58 L.Ed.2d 681 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. John B. Calandrella, United States of America v. John A. Kaye
See United States v. Chadwick, 433 U.S. at 15 & n. 9, 97 S.Ct. 2476 , cf. United States v. Haley, 581 F.2d 723 (8th Cir.) (exigent circumstances found in the presence of a potential medical emergency), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1005 , 99 S.Ct. 618 , 58 L.Ed.2d 681 (1978); United States v. Pugh, 566 F.2d 626 (8th Cir. 1977) (per curiam) (partially opened briefcase validly searched pursuant to the plain view exception to the warrant requirement), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 1010 , 98 S.Ct. 1885 , 56 L.Ed.2d 393 (1978); United States v. Matlock, 558 F.2d 1328 (8th Cir.) (search of opened briefcase justif…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Leonard
See, e.g., United States v. Haley, 581 F.2d 723, 726 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1005 (1978) (entry into automobile to “seek identification or medical alert cards which might be of assistance” to a man found unconscious nearby who did not appear to be either hurt or under the influence of alcohol); State v. Kersh, 313 N.W.2d 566 (Iowa 1981) (defendant slumped behind steering wheel did not respond to knocks on window).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Harold Evan Grant
(2×)
Compare United States v. Haley, 581 F.2d 723, 726 (8th Cir.) (exigent circumstances found in the presence of a potential medical emergency), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1005 , 99 S.Ct. 618 , 58 L.Ed.2d 681 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Isaac James Tindle, A/K/A I.J.
See also United States v. Trejo-Zambrano, 582 F.2d 460, 464 (9th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1005 , 99 S.Ct. 618 , 58 L.Ed.2d 682 (1978) (potential defense witness convicted, but not yet sentenced, could validly assert fifth amendment privilege since “from the record one cannot say that [the potential witness] did not legitimately fear incurring additional criminal liability from any testimony he could give on behalf of [a co-defendant]”); Hoffman v. United States, 341 U.S. 479, 486 , 71 S.Ct. 814, 818 , 95 L.Ed. 1118 (1951) (Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination is �…
Connor et ux.
v.
Illinois
v.
Illinois
No. 78-5273.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 4, 1978.
Published
App. Ct. Ill., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied.