green
Positive treatment
7.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 25 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena
See Matter of Special April 1977 Grand Jury, 581 F.2d 589, 591 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1046 , 99 S.Ct. 721 , 58 L.Ed.2d 705 (1978) (prior compliance with grand jury subpoena does not render objections to subpoena moot where there is a reasonable expectation that complaining party would be subjected to the same action again and the issues could not be fully litigated prior to compliance).
discussed
Cited "see"
2925 Briarpark, Ltd. v. Commissioner
Allan v. Commissioner, 856 F.2d 1169, 1172 (8th Cir.1988); see Laport v. Commissioner, 671 F.2d 1028 (7th Cir.1982); see Millar v. Commissioner, 67 T.C. 656 , 1977 WL 3701 (1977), aff'd, 577 F.2d 212 (3d Cir.), cert denied, 439 U.S. 1046 , 99 S.Ct. 721 , 58 L.Ed.2d 704 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Jean Ronald Getty Karin Getty v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
See Parker v. United States, 573 F.2d 42, 49 , 215 Ct.Cl. 773 , cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1046 , 99 S.Ct. 720 , 58 L.Ed.2d 704 (1978); Victor E.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena
See Matter of Special April 1977 Grand Jury, 581 F.2d 589 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1046 , 99 S.Ct. 721 , 58 L.Ed.2d 705 (1978); In re 1980 United States Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum, 502 F.Supp. 576 (E.D.La.1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Grand Jury Proceedings. Appeal of Hilton Fernandez Diamante. In Re Grand Jury Proceedings. Appeal of Elias Samuel Castro Ramos
(2×)
See In re Special 1977 Grand Jury, 581 F.2d 589 (7th Cir.1978) (court ruled on merits of challenge by state attorney general to subpoenas served upon his staff), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1046 , 99 S.Ct. 721 , 58 L.Ed.2d 705 (1978); United States v. Finazzo, 407 F.Supp. 1127, 1132 (E.D.Mich.1975) (court granted defendant’s motion to enjoin temporarily subpoenas of defendant’s records or of records “pertaining to [his] transactions”).
discussed
Cited "see"
McKeague v. United States
See Parker v. United States, 215 Ct.Cl. 773, 789-91 , 573 F.2d 42, 51-52 (1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1046 , 99 S.Ct. 720 , 58 L.Ed.2d 704 (1978); accord Burch v. United States, 698 F.2d 575, 579-80 (2d Cir.1983) (allocation between deductible and nondeductible expenses is not unusual).
discussed
Cited "see"
John P. McKeague and Constance F. McKeague v. The United States
See Parker v. United States, 215 Cl.Ct. 773 , 573 F.2d 42, 51-52 , cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1046 , 99 S.Ct. 720 , 58 L.Ed.2d 704 (1978); accord Burch v. United States, 698 F.2d 575, 579-80 (2d Cir.1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Served Upon John Doe, Esq. Richard Roe, Intervenor-Appellant v. United States
(2×)
See In Re Special April 1977 Grand Jury, 581 F.2d 589, 591 (7 Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1046 (1978); In Re Grand Jury Proceedings (Freeman), 708 F.2d 1571 , 1573 (1 Cir.1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Union Of Concerned Scientists v. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
See supra at 1449 25 The NRC also cites Public Service Co. v. NRC, 582 F.2d 77 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1046 , 99 S.Ct. 721 , 58 L.Ed.2d 705 (1978), to support its acquiescence argument.
discussed
Cited "see"
Estate of Ralph D. Cowser, Deceased, Patricia Ann Tucker v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
See Mapes v. United States, 576 F.2d 896, 901 (Ct.Cl.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1046 , 99 S.Ct. 722 , 58 L.Ed.2d 705 (1978); cf. Regan v. Taxation with Representation of Washington, 461 U.S. — - —, 103 S.Ct. at 2002-03.
discussed
Cited "see"
County Of Rockland v. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Sec. 2201 (p) (1976); see Public Service Company of New Hampshire v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 582 F.2d 77, 82 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1046 , 99 S.Ct. 721 , 58 L.Ed.2d 705 (1978). 5 We are concerned in this appeal with those Commission regulations that address off-site emergency preparedness.
discussed
Cited "see"
County of Rockland v. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Consistent with its administrative mandate, the NRC is empowered to promulgate rules and regulations governing the construction and operation of nuclear power plants. 42 U.S.C. § 2201 (p) (1976); see Public Service Company of New Hampshire v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 582 F.2d 77, 82 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1046 , 99 S.Ct. 721 , 58 L.Ed.2d 705 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
De Mars v. Commissioner
(2×)
See Mapes v. United States , 217 Ct. Cl. 115 , 576 F.2d 896 , cert. denied 439 U.S. 1046 (1978) ; Johnson v. United States, supra ↩ .
cited
Cited "see"
Pierce v. Commissioner
See Mapes v. United States, 217 Ct. Cl. 115 , 576 F.2d 896 (1978) , cert. denied 439 U.S. 1046 (1978) ; *29 Johnson v. United States, 422 F. Supp. 958 (N.D.
discussed
Cited "see"
Teofilo Evangelista and Frances Evangelista v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Millar v. Commissioner, 67 T.C. 656 (1977), aff'd, 577 F.2d 212 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1046 , 99 S.Ct. 721 , 58 L.Ed.2d 704 (1978).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Grand Jury
See, e.g., Matter of Special April 1977 Grand Jury, 581 F.2d 589, 593 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1046 , 99 S.Ct. 721 , 58 L.Ed.2d 705 (1978); Carr v. Monroe Mfg.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Subpoena Duces Tecum Directed to Dillon
See, e.g., In re Special April 1977 Grand Jury, 581 F.2d 589 , 593 n. 3 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1046 , 99 S.Ct. 721 , 58 L.Ed.2d 705 (1978); Carr v. Monroe Mfg.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
See, e.g., Public Service Co. of New Hampshire v. NRC, 582 F.2d 77, 81 (1st Cir.) ("The directive to agencies to minimize all unnecessary adverse environmental impact obtains except when specifically excluded by statute or when existing law makes compliance with NEPA impossible."), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1046 , 99 S.Ct. 721 , 58 L.Ed.2d 705 (1978). 8 Accordingly, "[u]nless there are specific statutory provisions which necessarily collide with NEPA, the Commission was under a duty to consider and, to the extent within its authority, minimize environmental damage...." Public Service, 582 F.2d at…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Limerick Ecology Action, Inc. v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission
See, e.g., Public Service Co. of New Hampshire v. NRC, 582 F.2d 77, 81 (1st Cir.) (“The directive to agencies to minimize all unnecessary adverse environmental impact obtains except when specifically excluded by statute or when existing law makes compliance with NEPA impossible.”), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1046 , 99 S.Ct. 721 , 58 L.Ed. 2d 705 (1978). 8 Accordingly, “[u]nless there are specific statutory provisions which necessarily collide with NEPA, the Commission was under a duty to consider and, to the extent within its authority, minimize environmental damage____” Public Service, 58…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Williams
In addition, we long ago determined that a complaint that “the failure of the government to present evidence to the grand jury which the defendants thought would have been exculpatory” was “wholly without merit.” United States v. Thomas, 567 F.2d 638, 642 (5th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom Oliveti v. United States, 439 U.S. 822 , 99 S.Ct. 90 , 58 L.Ed.2d 114 (1978); see also United States v. Brown, 574 F.2d 1274, 1276 (5th Cir.) (“the Government is under no duty to present to a grand jury evidence bearing on the credibility of witnesses”), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1046 , 99 S.Ct. 720 ,…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Williams
In addition, we long ago determined that a complaint that "the failure of the government to present evidence to the grand jury which the defendants thought would have been exculpatory" was "wholly without merit." United States v. Thomas, 567 F.2d 638, 642 (5th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom Oliveti v. United States, 439 U.S. 822 , 99 S.Ct. 90 , 58 L.Ed.2d 114 (1978); see also United States v. Brown, 574 F.2d 1274, 1276 (5th Cir.) ("the Government is under no duty to present to a grand jury evidence bearing on the credibility of witnesses"), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1046 , 99 S.Ct. 720 , 58 L.Ed.2d …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Grand Jury Matters, Appeal of United States of America
See, e.g., Matter of Special April 1977 Grand Jury, 581 F.2d 589 (7th Cir.) (considering privilege question and rule 17(c) reasonableness question separately), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1046 , 99 S.Ct. 721 , 58 L.Ed.2d 705 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Lawson
See, e. g., United States v. Brown, 574 F.2d 1274, 1275-77 (5th Cir.) cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1046 , 99 S.Ct. 720 , 58 L.Ed.2d 704 (1978); United States v. Kennedy, 564 F.2d 1329, 1335-38 (9th Cir. 1977), cert. denied sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Westinghouse Electric Corporation v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission
See also Public Service Co. of New Hampshire v. NRC, 582 F.2d 77, 82 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1046 , 99 S.Ct. 721 , 58 L.Ed.2d 705 (1978); North Anna Environmental Coalition v. NRC, 174 U.S.App.D.C. 428, 431-432 , 533 F.2d 655 , 658-59 (1976) 48 Section 1 of the AEA, 42 U.S.C. § 2011 (1976) 49 42 U.S.C. § 2013 (1976) 50 42 U.S.C. § 2201 (p) (1976) 51 42 U.S.C. § 2201 (b) (1976) 52 42 U.S.C. § 2133 (1976) 53 390 U.S. at 776 , 88 S.Ct. at 1364 54 15 U.S.C. § 717O (1976), which provides that the Commission "shall have power to perform any and all acts, and to prescribe . . . such …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission
See also Public Service Co. of New Hampshire v. NRC, 582 F.2d 77, 82 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1046 , 99 S.Ct. 721 , 58 L.Ed.2d 705 (1978); North Anna Environmental Coalition v. NRC, 174 U.S.App.
North Carolina
v.
Butler
v.
Butler
No. 78-354.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 11, 1978.
Published
Sup. Ct. N. C. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and certiorari granted.