green
Positive treatment
2.1 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Parent Ass'n of Andrew Jackson High School v. Ambach
See Brinkman v. Gilligan, 583 F.2d 243 (6th Cir. 1978), cert. granted, - U.S. -, 99 S.Ct. 831 , 59 L.Ed.2d 31 (1979). .
discussed
Cited "see"
The Parent Association Of Andrew Jackson High School v. Ambach
See Brinkman v. Gilligan, 583 F.2d 243 (6th Cir. 1978), Cert. granted, --- U.S. ----, 99 S.Ct. 831 , 59 L.Ed.2d 31 (1979) 6 It is, of course, a different matter if a desegregation plan includes elements that actually discriminate against minorities.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Armstrong v. O'CONNELL
See, e. g., Brinkman v. Gilligan, 583 F.2d 243 (6th Cir. 1978), cert. granted - U.S. -, 99 S.Ct. 831 , 59 L.Ed.2d 31 (1979); Penick v. Columbus Board of Education, 583 F.2d 787 (6th Cir. 1978), cert. granted - U.S. -, 99 S.Ct. 831 , 59 L.Ed.2d 31 , (1979); Evans v. Buchanan, 582 F.2d 750 (3d Cir. 1978); United States v. Texas Education Agency, 579 F.2d 910 (5th Cir. 1978) (en banc); Arthur v. Nyquist, 573 F.2d 134 (2d Cir. 1978); United States v. School District of Omaha, 565 F.2d 127 (8th Cir. 1977) (en banc); Booker v. Special School District No. 1, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 451 F.Supp. 659 (D…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Southern Railway Co.
v.
Seaboard Allied Milling Corp. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Seaboard Allied Milling Corp. and Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Co. v. Seaboard Allied Milling Corp.
v.
Seaboard Allied Milling Corp. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Seaboard Allied Milling Corp. and Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Co. v. Seaboard Allied Milling Corp.
No. 78-575; No. 78-597; No. 78-604.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 8, 1979.
Consideration, Petitions, Took.
Published
C. A. 8th Cir. Cer-tiorari granted, cases consolidated, and a total of one hour allotted for oral argument.
Mr. Justice Powell took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.Reported below: 570 F. 2d 1349.