green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
4.0 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1988 ·
…ere incantation of the plain meaning rule, without placing the language to be construed in its proper framework, cannot substitute for a meaningful analysis
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
State Of Vermont v. Lee Thomas
ere incantation of the plain meaning rule, without placing the language to be construed in its proper framework, cannot substitute for a meaningful analysis
discussed
Cited "but see"
Vermont v. Thomas
ere incantation of the plain meaning rule, without placing the language to be construed in its proper framework, cannot substitute for a meaningful analysis
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Van Dyke
See also United States v. Segal, 649 F.2d 599, 601 (8th Cir.1981); United States v. Griffin, 579 F.2d 1104, 1109 . (8th Cir.), cert. denied 439 U.S. 981 , 99 S.Ct. 569 , 58 L.Ed.2d 652 (1978); Brilliant v. United States, 297 F.2d 385, 389 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 369 U.S. 871 , 82 S.Ct. 1140 , 8 L.Ed.2d 275 (1962); United States v. Hockridge, 573 F.2d 752 , 755 n. 10 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 821 , 99 S.Ct. 85, 86, 58 L.Ed.2d 112 (1978); United States v. Cleary, 565 F.2d 43, 46 (2d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 915 , 98 S.Ct. 1469 , 55 L.Ed.2d 506 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Bank Brussels Lambert v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.
See generally United States v. Hockridge, 573 F.2d 752, 759 (2d Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 821 , 99 S.Ct. 85 , 86, 58 L.Ed.2d 112 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Eastern of New Jersey, Inc.
Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 7.22 (2d ed. 1979) (quoting Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co., 325 U.S. 410, 413-414 , 65 S.Ct. 1215, 1217 , 89 L.Ed. 1700 (1945)); see New York State Comm’n on Cable Television v. FCC, 571 F.2d 95 , 98 (2d Cir.) (“look to the ‘common sense’ of the ... regulation, to its purpose, to the practical consequences of the suggested interpretations, and to the agency’s own interpretations”), cer t. denied, 439 U.S. 820 , 99 S.Ct. 85 , 58 L.Ed.2d 112 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Manuel Octavio Adames, Et Ano., Manuel Octavio Adames
See New York State Comm’n on Cable Television v. FCC, 571 F.2d 95 , 98 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 820 , 99 S.Ct. 85 , 58 L.Ed.2d 112 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Raul Fernandez-Alfonso
See generally United States v. Abrahams, 575 F.2d 3 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 821 , 99 S.Ct. 85 , 58 L.Ed.2d 112 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Godofredo Martir
See United States v. Abrahams, 575 F.2d 3 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 821 , 99 S.Ct. 85 , 58 L.Ed.2d 112 (1978); S.Rep.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Accetturo
See United States v. Acevedo-Ramos, 755 F.2d 203, 206 (1st Cir.1985) (citing United States v. Abrahams, 575 F.2d 3 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 821 , 99 S.Ct. 85 , 58 L.Ed.2d 112 (1978); United States v. Melville, 306 F.Supp. 124, 127 (S.D.N.Y.1969); United States v. Graewe, 689 F.2d 54 (6th Cir.1982); United States v. Gilbert, 425 F.2d 490, 491, 492 (D.C.Cir.1969)).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. John Bagnariol, United States of America v. Gordon L. Walgren, United States of America v. Patrick Gallagher
See generally United States v. Hockridge, 573 F.2d 752, 758-59 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 821 , 99 S.Ct. 85 , 58 L.Ed.2d 112 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Lloyd, Carr and Company, Bankrupt (Two Cases). Appeal of Alan H. Abrahams. Appeal of United States of America
See United States v. Abrahams, 575 F.2d 3 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 821 , 99 S.Ct. 85 , 58 L.Ed.2d 112 (1978) (Abrahams’ unique history and circumstances held to justify his pretrial detention without bail).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Stover, Daniel
See, e.g., United States v. Hockridge, 573 F.2d 752, 759 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 821 , 99 S.Ct. 85 , 86, 58 L.Ed.2d 112 (1978).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Wayne S. Dakins
See, e.g., United States v. Hockridge, 573 F.2d 752, 759 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 821 , 99 S.Ct. 85 , 86, 58 L.Ed.2d 112 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Botero
See e.g., United States v. Abrahams, 575 F.2d 3 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 821 , 99 S.Ct. 85 , 58 L.Ed.2d 112 (1978); United States v. Ramirez, 589 F.Supp. 137 (D.Minn.1984); United States v. Meinster, 481 F.Supp. 1117 (S.D.Fla.1979).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Heller
See, e.g., New York State Commission of Cable Television v. FCC, 571 F.2d 95, 98 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 439 U.S. 820 , 99 S.Ct. 85 , 58 L.Ed.2d 112 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Eugene L. Hunt v. Richard Roth, Sheriff of Douglas County, Nebraska and Joseph Vitek, Warden, Douglas County Corrections Center, and Director, Douglas County Department of Corrections, Eugene L. Hunt v. James M. Murphy, District Judge of the Fourth Judicial District of the State of Nebraska, Douglas County, Nebraska
See, e. g., United States v. Abrahams, 575 F.2d 3 (1st Cir.), app'l for bail denied, 436 U.S. 902 , 98 S.Ct. 2229 , 56 L.Ed.2d 399 , cert. denied, 439 U.S. 821 , 99 S.Ct. 85 , 58 L.Ed.2d 112 (1978) (denying bail where accused had forfeited a $100,000 bond in the past and "lived a life of subterfuge, deceit and cunning.").
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hunt v. Roth
See, e. g., United States v. Abrahams, 575 F.2d 3 (1st Cir.), app’l for bail denied, 436 U.S. 902 , 98 S.Ct. 2229 , 56 L.Ed.2d 399 , cert. denied, 439 U.S. 821 , 99 S.Ct. 85 , 58 L.Ed.2d 112 (1978) (denying bail where accused had forfeited a $100,000 bond in the past and “lived a life of subterfuge, deceit and cunning.”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Williams et vir
v.
Califano, Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare
v.
Califano, Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare
No. 77-1533.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 2, 1978.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: Second Circuit (2)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certio-rari denied.