Lacklen v. Campbell, 439 U.S. 824 (1978). · Go Syfert
Search
Lacklen v. Campbell, 439 U.S. 824 (1978). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“nce the agreement is finalized its terms will be enforced.”
114 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 37 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Pellon (nysd, 1979-08-03)
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979 2002 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. Pellon (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
S.D.N.Y. · 1979 · signal: cf. · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
nce the agreement is finalized its terms will be enforced.
discussed Cited "see" Church of Scientology of Georgia, Inc. v. City of Sandy Springs
N.D. Ga. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See Jean v. Nelson, 711 F.2d at 1486 (citing United States v. Board of Commissioners of Indianapolis, 573 F.2d 400, 413 (7th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U..S. 824, 99 S.Ct. 93 , 58 L.Ed.2d 116 (1978) (holding that a plaintiff can make out a prima facie case of discrimination by establishing that the government ignored less discriminatory options which would have furthered its policies as effectively as the more discriminatory option it chose)).
cited Cited "see" In Re Allen-Main Associates Ltd. Partnership
2d Cir. BAP · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Stirling, 571 F.2d 708, 715 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 824 , 99 S.Ct. 93 , 58 L.Ed.2d 116 (1978).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Edward Lee Baker, AKA \Eddie\"
unknown court · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
This scope of review is "extremely narrow." United States v. Mariscal, 939 F.2d 884, 886 (9th Cir.1991); see United States v. Stirling, 571 F.2d 708, 733 (2d Cir.) (severance question is "virtually unreviewable"), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 824 , 99 S.Ct. 93 , 58 L.Ed.2d 116 (1978); United States v. Campanale, 518 F.2d 352, 359 (9th Cir.1975) (trial court's severance rulings "will rarely be disturbed on review"), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1050 , 96 S.Ct. 777 , 46 L.Ed.2d 638 (1976).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Baker
unknown court · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
This scope of review is “extremely narrow.” United States v. Mariscal, 939 F.2d 884, 886 (9th Cir.1991); see United States v. Stirling, 571 F.2d 708, 733 (2d Cir.) (severance question is “virtually unreviewable”), ce rt. denied, 439 U.S. 824 , 99 S.Ct. 93 , 58 L.Ed.2d 116 (1978); United States v. Campanale, 518 F.2d 352, 359 (9th Cir.1975) (trial court’s severance rulings “will rarely be disturbed on review”), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1050 , 96 S.Ct. 777 , 46 L.Ed.2d 638 (1976).
cited Cited "see" United States v. George Story and Curtis Jones
2d Cir. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Stirling, 571 F.2d 708, 730-32 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 824 , 99 S.Ct. 93 , 58 L.Ed.2d 116 (1978).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Berg
E.D.N.Y · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Stirling, 571 F.2d 708, 735 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 824 , 99 S.Ct. 93 , 58 L.Ed.2d 116 (1978).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Castelbuono
E.D.N.Y · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Stirling, 571 F.2d 708, 730-32 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 824 , 99 S.Ct. 93 , 58 L.Ed.2d 116 (1978) (defendant’s failure to fulfill terms of plea agreement allowed Government to use grand jury testimony in later prosecution); United States v. Pellon, 475 F.Supp. 467 (S.D.N.Y.1979), aff'd, 620 F.2d 286 (2d Cir.1980) (non-prosecution agreement not a grant of full immunity, Kurzer does not apply, defendants got what they bargained for).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Lopez
N.D. Ill. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Stirling, 571 F.2d 708 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 824 , 99 S.Ct. 93 , 58 L.Ed.2d 116 (1978).
cited Cited "see" In the Matter of Vintero Corporation, Debtor. Vintero Corporation v. Corporacion Venezolana De Fomento
2d Cir. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Stirling, 571 F.2d 708, 715 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 824 , 99 S.Ct. 93 , 58 L.Ed.2d 116 (1978).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Thomas Burgess
4th Cir. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Stirling, 571 F.2d 708, 736 (2d Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 824 , 99 S.Ct. 93 , 58 L.Ed.2d 116 (1978): Finally, they [defendants] argue that the district court erred in excluding one Peter Turzik ... as a surrebuttal witness . .. [T]he district court at the same time allowed Joseph Kirkland ... to testify in surrebuttal to much the same effect that Turzik would have.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Cordero v. Rivera
S.D.N.Y. · 2009 · signal: see also · confidence low
The decision whether to admit such evidence is left to the “sound discretion” of the trial court, United States v. Williams, 283 F.Supp.2d 850, 856 (E.D.N.Y.2003) (quoting United States v. Wilford, 710 F.2d 439 , 452 (8th Cir.1983)); see also United States v. Stirling, 571 F.2d 708 , 736 (2d Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 824 , 99 S.Ct. 93 , 58 L.Ed.2d 116 (1978), and is reviewed only for abuse of discretion, see United States v. Mitan, 966 F.2d 1165, 1176 (7th Cir. 1992) (quoting United States v. Chapman, 954 F.2d 1352, 1374 (7th Cir.1992)).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." People v. Scheller
Cal. Ct. App. · 2006 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
(See U.S. v. Ventura-Cruel, supra, 356 F.3d at p. 64, fn. 11 ; see, e.g., U.S. v. Stirling (2d Cir. 1978) 571 F.2d 708 , 732, cert. den. (1978) 439 U.S. 824 [ 58 L.Ed.2d 116 , 99 S.Ct. 93 ].) The result might also be different if the record showed that defendant breached or reneged on the plea bargain.
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Williams
E.D.N.Y · 2003 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also U.S. v. Stirling, 571 F.2d 708 , 736 (2d Cir.). cert. denied, 439 U.S. 824 , 99 S.Ct. 93 , 58 L.Ed.2d 116 (1978).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Remi Pelletier and Robert Pelletier
2d Cir. · 1990 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Stirling, 571 F.2d 708 , 730 n. 16 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 824 , 99 S.Ct. 93 , 58 L.Ed.2d 116 (1978); United States v. Castelbuono, 643 F.Supp. 965, 974 (E.D.N.Y.1986) (Appendix ¶ 3).
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Finley
N.D. Ill. · 1989 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Stirling, 571 F.2d 708, 736 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 824 , 99 S.Ct. 93 , 58 L.Ed.2d 116 (1978); United States v. Davis, 673 F.Supp. 252, 261 (N.D.Ill.1987).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Stanley Friedman, Michael Lazar, Lester Shafran, and Marvin Kaplan, Defendants
2d Cir. · 1988 · signal: see also · confidence low
We held that “absent ... a motion [for mistrial], the allegedly prejudicial conduct may be reviewed only for plain error.” Id.; see also United States v. Stirling, 571 F.2d 708, 734 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 824 , 99 S.Ct. 93 , 58 L.Ed.2d 116 (1978).
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Skalsky
D.N.J. · 1985 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Stirling, 571 F.2d 708, 732 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 824 , 99 S.Ct. 93 , 58 L.Ed.2d 116 (1978).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Robert H. Davis, United States of America v. George D. Gelestino
D.C. Cir. · 1980 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare, e. g., United States v. Robertson, 582 F.2d 1356 (5th Cir. 1978) (en banc), and United States v. Stirling, 571 F.2d 708 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 824 , 99 S.Ct. 93 , 58 L.Ed.2d 116 (1978), discussed at pp. — - — of 199 U.S.App.D.C., at pp. 684-685 of 617 F.2d infra, with, e. g., United States v. Herman, 544 F.2d 791 (5th Cir. 1977).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lacklen
v.
Campbell, Chairman, Civil Service Commission
No. 77-1617.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 2, 1978.
439 U.S. 824
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 72%
Citer courts: S.D. New York (1)

C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.