City of Durham v. Keen, 257 S.E.2d 217 (N.C. 1979). · Go Syfert
City of Durham v. Keen, 257 S.E.2d 217 (N.C. 1979). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
47 citation events (12 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Nobles v. First Carolina Communications, Inc. (ncctapp, 1992-12-01)
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979 2002 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Nobles v. First Carolina Communications, Inc. (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
N.C. Ct. App. · 1992 · confidence medium
Id. at 284, 354 S.E.2d at 466 ; Perry v. Union Camp Corp., 100 N.C.App. 168 , 394 S.E.2d 681 (1990).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
CITY OF DURHAM
v.
Marjorie S. KEEN and spouse, the County of Durham, Original Defendants,
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Jul 12, 1979.
257 S.E.2d 217
Published

E. C. Harris, Jr., Blackwell M. Brogden, Jr., for defendant Keen.

Rufus C. Boutwell, Jr., for plaintiff City of Durham.

T. Russell Odom, for defendant County of Durham.

C. Horton Poe, Jr., for defendants Knotts.

Defendant's Keen notice of appeal and petition for discretionary review under G.S. § 7A-31. 40 N.C.App. 652, 253 S.E.2d 585. Petition denied. Motion of the defendants Knotts to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question. Allowed.