Virginia Elec. & Power Co. v. Tillett, 347 S.E.2d 457 (N.C. 1986). · Go Syfert
Search
Virginia Elec. & Power Co. v. Tillett, 347 S.E.2d 457 (N.C. 1986). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 2007 · …under a de novo review, the court considers the matter anew and freely substitute its own judgment for the trial court. ⚠ not in text
76 citation events (46 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Britt v. State (ncctapp, 2007-09-04)
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986 2006 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Britt v. State (2×)
N.C. Ct. App. · 2007 · quote attribution · 2 verbatim quotes · confidence low
under a de novo review, the court considers the matter anew and freely substitute its own judgment for the trial court.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY
v.
Marshall F. TILLETT, Jr. and wife, Blythe Tillett.
371P86.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Aug 12, 1986.
347 S.E.2d 457
Published
1 passages pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 66%
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of North Caro… (2)

Hornthal, Riley, Ellis & Maland, Elizabeth City, for plaintiff.

Shearin & Archbell, Kitty Hawk, for defendants.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 12th day of August 1986."