green
Positive treatment
2.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Sabates v. Sabates
App. 370, 375 , 465 S.E.2d 561, 564 , cert. denied, 343 N.C. 305 , 471 S.E.2d 68 *421 (1996); see also Roane-Barker, 99 N.C.
discussed
Cited "see"
Badillo v. Cunningham
(2×)
See Cheek v. Poole, 121 N.C.App. 370 , 374, 465 S.E.2d 561 , 564, cert. denied, 343 N.C. 305 , 471 S.E.2d 68 (1996).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Dunn v. Canoy
See, e.g., Davis v. Wrenn, 121 N.C.App. 156, 160 , 464 S.E.2d 708, 711 (1995) (reviewing an award of fees under Rule 11), cert. denied, 343 N.C. 305 , 471 S.E.2d 69 (1996).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Richard G. CHEEK
v.
Samuel H. POOLE, Individually, And As A General Partner of Johnson, Poole, Webster, & Bost.
v.
Samuel H. POOLE, Individually, And As A General Partner of Johnson, Poole, Webster, & Bost.
50P96.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
May 9, 1996.
Published
John B. Evans, Pinehurst, Patrick W. Currie, for Cheek.
Ronald C. Dilthey, Charles George, Raleigh, for Poole.
Prior report: 121 N.C.App. 370, 465 S.E.2d 561.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th day of May 1996."