green
Positive treatment
1.9 score
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Dunkley v. Shoemate
Dunkley v. Shoemate, 346 N.C. 274, 274 , 485 S.E.2d 295, 295 (1997) (per curiam).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Rebecca Dunkley
v.
Lee H. Shoemate, Eric B. Munson, David S. Janowsky, Preston A. Walker, Mary F. Lutz, Doe One, Doe Two, and Doe Three
v.
Lee H. Shoemate, Eric B. Munson, David S. Janowsky, Preston A. Walker, Mary F. Lutz, Doe One, Doe Two, and Doe Three
28PA97.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Jun 6, 1997.
Law Offices of Grover C. McCain, Jr., by Grover C. McCain, Jr., and Frank W. Hallstrom, for plaintiff-appellant.
,
Patterson, Dilthey, Clay & Bryson, L.L.P., by Robert M. Clay, for defendant-appellee Shoemate.
,
Bailey & Dixon, L.L.P., by Gary S. Parsons and Kenyann G. Brown, on behalf of Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company and the Alliance of American Insurers, amici curiae.
Per Curiam.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
PER CURIAM.
The interlocutory order of the superior court, from which the plaintiff appealed, affects a substantial right which the plaintiff will lose if the order is not reviewed before final judgment. Waters v. Qualified Personnel, Inc., 294 N.C. 200, 240 S.E.2d 338 (1977); Highway Commission v. Nuckles, 271 N.C. 1, 155 S.E.2d 772 (1967). It was error to dismiss the appeal. We reverse the order dismissing the appeal and remand to the Court of Appeals for a hearing on the merits.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.