Hylton v. Koontz, 547 S.E.2d 10 (N.C. 2001). · Go Syfert
Search
Hylton v. Koontz, 547 S.E.2d 10 (N.C. 2001). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
21 citation events (21 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Phillips v. a Triangle Women's Health Clinic, Inc. (ncctapp, 2002-12-31)
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Phillips v. a Triangle Women's Health Clinic, Inc. (2×)
N.C. Ct. App. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hylton v. Koontz, 138 N.C.App. 511 , 530 S.E.2d 108 , disc. review denied, 353 N.C. 264 , 546 S.E.2d 98 (2000), rehearing dismissed, 353 N.C. 373 , 547 S.E.2d 10 (2001). [3] Alternatively, plaintiff argues compliance with Rule 9(j) is irrelevant to her medical malpractice claim because this Court held in Anderson v. Assimos, 146 N.C.App. 339 , 553 S.E.2d 63 (2001), appeal granted, 355 N.C. 348 , 561 S.E.2d 498 (2002), that Rule 9(j) was unconstitutional.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
HYLTON
v.
KOONTZ
No. 296P00.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Feb 1, 2001.
547 S.E.2d 10
Published

Petition by defendants (Schkolne, M.D. and Piedmont Anesthesia and Pain Consultants) to rehear order denying petition for discretionary review pursuant to Rule 31 dismissed 1 February 2001.