In Re Pittman, 568 S.E.2d 608 (N.C. 2002). · Go Syfert
Search
In Re Pittman, 568 S.E.2d 608 (N.C. 2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 2009 · …the trial court should have considered whether the natural father was a candidate for custody of patricia ⚠ not in text
78 citation events (78 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: In Re Jv (ncctapp, 2009-07-07)
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) In Re Jv
N.C. Ct. App. · 2009 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
the trial court should have considered whether the natural father was a candidate for custody of patricia
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) In re J.V.
N.C. Ct. App. · 2009 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
the trial court should have considered whether the natural father was a candidate for custody of patricia
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In re L.O.K. (2×)
N.C. Ct. App. · 2005 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also In re Pittman, 149 N.C.App. 756 , 761, 561 S.E.2d 560 , 564 ("[T]he common thread running throughout the Juvenile Code, § 7B-100 et seq., is that the court's primary concern must be the child's best interest."), appeal dismissed and disc. review denied, 356 N.C. 163 , 568 S.E.2d 608 -09 (2002), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 982 , 123 S.Ct. 1799 , 155 L.Ed.2d 673 (2003).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In Re LOK (2×)
N.C. Ct. App. · 2005 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also In re Pittman, 149 N.C.App. 756, 761 , 561 S.E.2d 560, 564 ("[T]he common thread running throughout the Juvenile Code, § 7B-100 et seq., is that the court's primary concern must be the child's best interest."), appeal dismissed and disc. review denied, 356 N.C. 163 , 568 S.E.2d 608 -09 (2002), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 982 , 123 S.Ct. 1799 , 155 L.Ed.2d 673 (2003).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In re Jakel PITTMAN, A Minor Child DOB: 10-03-99.
229P02.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Aug 15, 2002.
568 S.E.2d 608
Published
1 passages pin-cited by 2 cases
Pinpoint authority: bottom 75%
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of North Caro… (2)

J. Richard Hamlett, II, Tarboro, for Lekeshia Harris.

[*609] Jayne B. Norwood, for Nash Co. DSS.

Judith L. Kornegay, Rocky Mount, for Guardian ad Litem.

Francisco J. Bricio, Cary, for James Pittman.

Prior report: 149 N.C.App. 756, 561 S.E .2d 560.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Respondent (James Pittman) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 15th day of August 2002."