Steinkrause v. Tatum, 700 S.E.2d 222 (N.C. 2010). · Go Syfert
Search
Steinkrause v. Tatum, 700 S.E.2d 222 (N.C. 2010). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“our court reviews a trial court's decisions regarding jury instructions de novo .”
35 citation events (35 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Greenfield (ncctapp, 2018-12-04)
Treatment trajectory · 2010 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2010 2018 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) State v. Greenfield (3×) also: Cited as authority (rule)
N.C. Ct. App. · 2018 · quote attribution · 2 verbatim quotes · confidence low
our court reviews a trial court's decisions regarding jury instructions de novo .
cited Cited as authority (rule) In re Cottrell
N.C. Ct. App. · 2014 · confidence medium
Id. at 290, 689 S.E.2d at 380 .
cited Cited as authority (rule) State v. Overocker
N.C. Ct. App. · 2014 · confidence medium
The Court emphasized that a “car accident alone does not support a finding of probable cause.” Id. at 294, 689 S.E.2d at 382.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Karen STEINKRAUSE, Petitioner
v.
George TATUM, Commissioner of the North Carolina Division of Motor Vehicles, Respondent.
18A10.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Oct 8, 2010.
700 S.E.2d 222
Per Curiam.
Published
2 passages pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 62%
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of North Caro… (2)

George B. Currin, Raleigh, for petitioner-appellant.

Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Christopher W. Brooks, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.