neutral
Cited (no substantive treatment)
0.8 score
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Albert H. Samost and Timothy E. Shaughnessy
v.
Duke University
v.
Duke University
218A13.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Dec 20, 2013.
Ekstrand & Ekstrand LLP, by Robert Ekstrand, for plaintiff-appellants.
,
Ellis & Winters LLP, by Paul K. Sun, Jr., Nora F. Warren, and Kelly Margolis Dagger, for defendant-appellee.
Per Curiam.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
PER CURIAM.
Justice JACKSON took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See, e.g., Amward Homes, Inc. v. Town of Cary, 365 N.C. 305, 716 S.E.2d 849 (2011); State v. Pastuer, 367 N.C. 287, 715 S.E.2d 850 (2011).
AFFIRMED.