Dawkins v. State, 825 S.W.2d 709 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992). · Go Syfert
Search
Dawkins v. State, 825 S.W.2d 709 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
16 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Kenneth J. Maxwell v. State (texapp, 2008-03-13)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Kenneth J. Maxwell v. State
Tex. App. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See Dawkins v. State, 822 S.W.2d 668, 671 (Tex. App.—Waco 1991), pet. ref’d, 825 S.W.2d 709 (Tex. Crim.
discussed Cited "see" Maxwell v. State
Tex. App. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See Dawkins v. State, 822 S.W.2d 668, 671 (Tex.App.-Waco 1991), pet. ref'd, 825 S.W.2d 709 (Tex.Crim.App.1992); Barraza v. State, 733 S.W.2d 379, 381 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 1987), aff'd, 790 S.W.2d 654 (Tex.Crim.App.1990). 3 .
cited Cited "see" Kenneth J. Maxwell v. State
Tex. App. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See Dawkins v. State , 822 S.W.2d 668, 671 (Tex. App.—Waco 1991), pet. ref’d, 825 S.W.2d 709 (Tex. Crim.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Stephen Warren DAWKINS
v.
The STATE of Texas
No. 103-92.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
Mar 18, 1992.
825 S.W.2d 709
B. Dwight Goains, Waco, Walter M. Reaves, Jr., West, for appellant., Dan V. Dent, Dist. Atty., Hillsboro, Robert Huttash, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.
Published

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

A jury convicted appellant of the felony offense of driving while intoxicated and assessed punishment at confinement for twenty years and a fine of $5,000.00. The Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction. Dawkins v. State, 822 S.W.2d 668 (Tex.App.—Waco, 1991).

Appellant raises four grounds for review. After careful review we refuse appellant’s petition for review. However, as is true in every case where discretionary review is refused, this refusal does not constitute endorsement or adoption of the reasoning employed by the Court of Appeals. Sheffield v. State, 650 S.W.2d 813 (Tex.Cr.App.1983). With this understanding, we refuse appellant’s petition for discretionary review.