Hornsby v. State, 200 So. 541 (Fla. 1941). · Go Syfert
Search
Hornsby v. State, 200 So. 541 (Fla. 1941). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“the right of the surviving spouse to have, protect and dispose of the remains of the other is a right recognized by law.”
48 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 9 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: LEE GIAT v. SCI FUNERAL SERVICES OF FLORIDA, LLC d/b/a MENORAH GARDENS (fladistctapp, 2020-12-09)
Treatment trajectory · 1941 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1941 1983 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (verbatim quote) LEE GIAT v. SCI FUNERAL SERVICES OF FLORIDA, LLC d/b/a MENORAH GARDENS
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2020 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
the right of the surviving spouse to have, protect and dispose of the remains of the other is a right recognized by law.
cited Cited "see" Willis v. GAMI GOLDEN GLADES, LLC.
Fla. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See id. at 542.
cited Cited "see" Travelers Indemnity Company v. Butchikas
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1975 · signal: see · confidence high
See Dunahoo v. Bess, 146 Fla. 182 , 200 So. 541 ; Vol. 9A Fla. Jurisprudence (Damages), § 92, p. 325.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Shunk v. Gulf American Land Corp.
Fla. · 1969 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Sims Tire Service, Inc. v. Parker, 146 Fla. 23 , 200 So. 524 ; Crowell v. Messana Contractors (Fla.) 180 So.2d 329 ; Sun Insurance Co. v. Boyd (Fla.App.) 101 So.2d 419 and United States Casualty Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co. (Fla.) 55 So.2d 741 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
J. A. Hornsby, Appellant,
v.
State, Appellee
Supreme Court of Florida.
Feb 4, 1941.
200 So. 541
Douglas Schad, for Appellant; George Couper Gibbs, Attorney General, and William Fisher, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for Appellee.
Whitfield, Buford, Chapman, Thomas, Brown, Terrell, Adams.
Published
Per Curiam.

The sole error complained of is that the evidence was insufficient to support a verdict of guilty of grand larceny. We have examined it and are of the opinion that there was ample testimony to justify the verdict and judgment of the court.

It is, therefore, ordered that the judgment be—

Affirmed.

Whitfield, Buford, Chapman and Thomas, J. J., concur. Brown, C. J., Terrell and Adams, J. J., dissent.