Hogue v. Smith, 11 So. 2d 316 (Fla. 1943). · Go Syfert
Search
Hogue v. Smith, 11 So. 2d 316 (Fla. 1943). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
44 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: IN RE: FINAL REPORT OF THE 20TH STATEWIDE GRAND JURY CASE 8 vs (fladistctapp, 2022-07-27)
Treatment trajectory · 1944 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1944 1985 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) IN RE: FINAL REPORT OF THE 20TH STATEWIDE GRAND JURY CASE 8 vs
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2022 · confidence medium
That case involved a local grand jury, and the supreme court recognized that the grand jury had broad authority to investigate and report on “general activities of public institutions and personnel.” Id. at 521 (citing In re Report of Grand Jury, 11 So. 2d 316, 318 (1943)).
examined Cited as authority (rule) IN RE: FINAL REPORT OF THE 20TH STATEWIDE GRAND JURY CASE 8 vs (3×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2022 · confidence medium
In re Rep. of Grand Jury, 11 So. 2d at 319 (emphasis added).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Kelly v. Sturgis
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1984 · confidence medium
Brautigam v. Interim Report of Grand Jury, 93 So.2d 99 (Fla. 1957); Owens v. State, 59 So.2d 254 (Fla. 1952); Re Report of Grand Jury, 152 Fla. 154 , 11 So.2d 316, 318 (1943).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Appeal of Untreiner
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1980 · confidence medium
In re Report of Grand Jury, 152 Fla. 154 , 11 So.2d 316, 318 (1943); Marko, supra, at 521 .
discussed Cited "see" Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. Brautigam
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1961 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Report of Grand Jury, 1943, 152 Fla. 154 , 11 So.2d 316 , hereinafter referred to as the Graves case; Owens v. State, Fla. 1952, 59 So.2d 254 ; and Ryon v. Shaw, Fla. 1955, 77 So.2d 455, 457 , 48 A.L.R.2d 713 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
R. D. HOGUE, Et Al.,
v.
LULA W. SMITH
Supreme Court of Florida.
Jan 19, 1943.
11 So. 2d 316
A.R. Hogue, (Jamestown, Tennessee), for appellants. J. Lewis Hall and A.L. Porter, for appellee.
Buford, Terrell, Brown, Thomas.
Published
PER CURIAM:

No error having been made clearly to appear the decree of the chancellor is—

Affirmed.

BUFORD, C. J., TERRELL, BROWN, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.